you seem to be using the above comment a lot lately
Face it, when conditions are the same we win almost every time. This is something you have no answer for
you seem to be using the above comment a lot lately
you................have..................no...................answer..........................Terry wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:31 pmGoldfish bowl alert!!!!!! Pal, this idiocy has been trashed so many times it hardly bears saying again.....hence I don't!!! Everybody except the raging fumbling zealot knows this. If it gives you comfort in these difficult times go ahead but don't expect intelligent posters to cop this rubbish!!!!!
ahhhh, you guys do too you fuking hypocrite. You bang on with the same argument every week.
there's a difference between games played and games the TV audience has the ability to watch. Until you get this key difference you'll never understandAFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:09 pmOh dear .
Official ratings figures are wrong .
Silly me thinking one sport with millions & millions of viewers more ..with less games ..with one teams home ratings not counted is the most watched .
Hey lol
Why aren't you letting the ratings companies know that their ratings are wrong wrong wrong .
but your argument has been proven incorrect because the AFL average more per game during rounds where many teams are on a bye meaning each market is not targeted. The difference is every game is shown in isolation. If your point was correct the averages would be similar. You cannot get past this point and in fact I dont even think you have addressed it even though I've mentioned it numerous timesAFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:34 pmOh boy
& as I've argued & you keep ignoring .
What you lose in games on at the same time you make up for by showing into home markets .
Tv stations know how to get the maximum viewing audience .
& showing home teams into home markets is high on the list .
There's also the other points but I've given up explaining them to a moron .
NlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:43 pmbut your argument has been proven incorrect because the AFL average more per game during rounds where many teams are on a bye meaning each market is not targeted. The difference is every game is shown in isolation. If your point was correct the averages would be similar. You cannot get past this point and in fact I dont even think you have addressed it even though I've mentioned it numerous timesAFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:34 pmOh boy
& as I've argued & you keep ignoring .
What you lose in games on at the same time you make up for by showing into home markets .
Tv stations know how to get the maximum viewing audience .
& showing home teams into home markets is high on the list .
There's also the other points but I've given up explaining them to a moron .
but they were well above our average PTV games which are shown concurrentlypussycat wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:29 pmNlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:43 pmbut your argument has been proven incorrect because the AFL average more per game during rounds where many teams are on a bye meaning each market is not targeted. The difference is every game is shown in isolation. If your point was correct the averages would be similar. You cannot get past this point and in fact I dont even think you have addressed it even though I've mentioned it numerous timesAFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:34 pmOh boy
& as I've argued & you keep ignoring .
What you lose in games on at the same time you make up for by showing into home markets .
Tv stations know how to get the maximum viewing audience .
& showing home teams into home markets is high on the list .
There's also the other points but I've given up explaining them to a moron .
If something is complete bull shit, and you just keep repeating it it continues to be complete bull shit. Last Saturday your three PTV games were shown with virtually no over lap and in isolation. Yet they where still 70, 80 and 100k below what our PTV games average of a Saturday. But, But, But ie. 250k.
So that's your excuse? they were pathetic and now there slightly better than pathetic. Ahr , well that changes everythingNlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:38 pmbut they were well above our average PTV games which are shown concurrentlypussycat wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:29 pmNlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:43 pm
but your argument has been proven incorrect because the AFL average more per game during rounds where many teams are on a bye meaning each market is not targeted. The difference is every game is shown in isolation. If your point was correct the averages would be similar. You cannot get past this point and in fact I dont even think you have addressed it even though I've mentioned it numerous times
If something is complete bull shit, and you just keep repeating it it continues to be complete bull shit. Last Saturday your three PTV games were shown with virtually no over lap and in isolation. Yet they where still 70, 80 and 100k below what our PTV games average of a Saturday. But, But, But ie. 250k.
But that's only part of the equation. The other is almost all of our games are on FTA and fox, which for both codes lowers the fox ratings
it's fact. Exclusive games on fox rate better on fox than games shown on FTA and fox.pussycat wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:24 pmSo that's your excuse? they were pathetic and now there slightly better than pathetic. Ahr , well that changes everythingNlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:38 pmbut they were well above our average PTV games which are shown concurrentlypussycat wrote: ↑Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:29 pm
If something is complete bull shit, and you just keep repeating it it continues to be complete bull shit. Last Saturday your three PTV games were shown with virtually no over lap and in isolation. Yet they where still 70, 80 and 100k below what our PTV games average of a Saturday. But, But, But ie. 250k.
But that's only part of the equation. The other is almost all of our games are on FTA and fox, which for both codes lowers the fox ratings
And the difference FTA coverage would make, when some one is paying $70 a month for add free football would be less than 20k . About 5k , in the match that only had Sydney on FTA and the other would be similar as it was showing just Brisbane.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests