Page 1 of 3

AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:18 am
by leeroy*NRL*
Figures regarding how much every club was paid by the AFL in 2016 have been released, with expansion club GWS well out in front.

The Giants received over $21 million from the league in 2016, around $3 million above St Kilda in second place and double what Fremantle and Adelaide received, according to a report in the Herald Sun.

The league handed out $255 million in revenue to the 18 clubs, based on each club's financial circumstances and other factors.

GWS chief executive David Matthews told the Herald Sun the raw figures didn't tell the whole story.

“It’s on the record we might get $20 million but every club gets $10 million or $11 million,’’ he said.



“We might get more than Gold Coast and four or five million more than a couple of Melbourne clubs who have been around for 150 million years.

“But what we talk to the AFL Commission about is are we on track, are we growing our revenue streams?"

Matthews said GWS and Gold Coast were already proving their worth, suggesting the AFL's revenue has gone right up as the amount of matches each week has inreased.

“The simple headline on the investment is the AFL has already got the investment back by creating the ninth game (every week)," he said.

“That extra game is worth $57 million. If you split it equally with us and the Gold Coast we are already washing our face."

Interesting point Extra expansion teams added value amount of extra game worth 57mill

How much each club was paid by the AFL in 2016:

1. GWS Giants $21,548,374

2. St Kilda $18,566,589

3. Western Bulldogs $17,610,181

4. Brisbane Lions $17,532,922

5. Gold Coast Suns $17,194,594

6. North Melbourne $15,022,303

7. Melbourne $14,799,452

8. Port Adelaide $13,206,665

9. Sydney Swans $12,488,957

10. Richmond $12,358,925

11. Essendon $11,914,715

12. West Coast Eagles $11,703,240

13. Hawthorn $11,614,683

14. Carlton $11,607,942

15. Collingwood $11,304,689

16. Geelong Cats $10,787,483

17. Fremantle Dockers $10,563,307

18. Adelaide Crows $10,553,565

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:01 am
by pussycat
Also AFL clubs take out bank loans underwritten by the AFL..

This is on top of there own $180m loan.

An organisation in free fall!


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/AFL/t ... 9e817a6b34

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:21 am
by AFLcrap1
Lol
What a compromised competition .
As well as this ,there's the other benefits to the GC Midgets & swans . What a pile of puke

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:50 am
by Fred
Interesting. I thought the giants would have got lots more given all the hype of what they are costing. It seems clubs get their share of broadcast rights then topped up based on their financial circumstances. Given it is the biggest sporting business in the country it's hard to question such a successful business model. Clubs will all struggle from time to time so it's good to see them looking at the big long term picture.

Seeing the courier mail today having a season lift out for the AFL indicates some progress. Interesting section on qafl and growth in the game at junior level and also at senior level. Also women's AFL is soaring with 35 new teams in 2016.

So the investment is paying off.

11 percent growth in club footy with 27938 players. 15477 of those juniors with 1192 teams at 179 community clubs.

That's pretty good and are club numbers not Auskick which was listed separately at 28273 "participants"

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:55 pm
by AFLcrap1
Hard to question a successful business model.

Lol
It is if you are raised(brainwashed) in fumble land .
You just nod & go along with the bullshit .
Those outside the bubble see it for what it is .
An unfair...uneven comp.
Compromised .

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:57 pm
by NlolRL
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:18 am
Figures regarding how much every club was paid by the AFL in 2016 have been released, with expansion club GWS well out in front.

The Giants received over $21 million from the league in 2016, around $3 million above St Kilda in second place and double what Fremantle and Adelaide received, according to a report in the Herald Sun.

The league handed out $255 million in revenue to the 18 clubs, based on each club's financial circumstances and other factors.

GWS chief executive David Matthews told the Herald Sun the raw figures didn't tell the whole story.

“It’s on the record we might get $20 million but every club gets $10 million or $11 million,’’ he said.



“We might get more than Gold Coast and four or five million more than a couple of Melbourne clubs who have been around for 150 million years.

“But what we talk to the AFL Commission about is are we on track, are we growing our revenue streams?"

Matthews said GWS and Gold Coast were already proving their worth, suggesting the AFL's revenue has gone right up as the amount of matches each week has inreased.

“The simple headline on the investment is the AFL has already got the investment back by creating the ninth game (every week)," he said.

“That extra game is worth $57 million. If you split it equally with us and the Gold Coast we are already washing our face."

Interesting point Extra expansion teams added value amount of extra game worth 57mill

How much each club was paid by the AFL in 2016:

1. GWS Giants $21,548,374

2. St Kilda $18,566,589

3. Western Bulldogs $17,610,181

4. Brisbane Lions $17,532,922

5. Gold Coast Suns $17,194,594

6. North Melbourne $15,022,303

7. Melbourne $14,799,452

8. Port Adelaide $13,206,665

9. Sydney Swans $12,488,957

10. Richmond $12,358,925

11. Essendon $11,914,715

12. West Coast Eagles $11,703,240

13. Hawthorn $11,614,683

14. Carlton $11,607,942

15. Collingwood $11,304,689

16. Geelong Cats $10,787,483

17. Fremantle Dockers $10,563,307

18. Adelaide Crows $10,553,565
Clubs get a share of the Tv rights, money from sales of merchandise and AFL memberships, so teams from 9-18 really get what they are entitled to. Teams playing out of Etihad got extra assitance probably due to the shocking deal they had with the stadium owners, however, this shouldnt be an issue now the AFL own the stadium. GWS and Suns are still establishing themselves so extra support is warranted. Brisbane is the only real concern on that list IMO.

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:11 pm
by Fred
Agreed Nrol Brisbane is a concern however Aussie rules at lower levels appears to be doing exceptionally well.

And AFL crap... you can't argue with success. Maybe the nrl would have done well to take some tips from the AFL and lay book.

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:13 pm
by Fred
In saying that many many AFL supporters agree with you re the giants and suns concessions so not sure about your bubble anology and people just accept what told. You would be able n good company with what you say with many An AFL supporter.

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:29 pm
by pussycat
Fred wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:50 am
Interesting. I thought the giants would have got lots more given all the hype of what they are costing. It seems clubs get their share of broadcast rights then topped up based on their financial circumstances. Given it is the biggest sporting business in the country it's hard to question such a successful business model. Clubs will all struggle from time to time so it's good to see them looking at the big long term picture.

Seeing the courier mail today having a season lift out for the AFL indicates some progress. Interesting section on qafl and growth in the game at junior level and also at senior level. Also women's AFL is soaring with 35 new teams in 2016.

So the investment is paying off.

11 percent growth in club footy with 27938 players. 15477 of those juniors with 1192 teams at 179 community clubs.

That's pretty good and are club numbers not Auskick which was listed separately at 28273 "participants"
Birchgrove oval ! What were the numbers again? [-X

$80m in the future fund [-X

When is the Murray River brigade going to work out that fact and fantasy are two different things. [-(

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:14 pm
by Fred
Compare that to rl in Victoria or Sa or tassie ... as good as non existent. Yet these numbers point to actual clubs and teams and players.

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:25 pm
by AFLcrap1
Fred .
That is the whole problem .
NUMBERS
You say THESE numbers point blah blah .
Yet ignore where AFL house has continually been caught out lying about numbers .

Forgive us Rl fans if we are sceptical ...but you can only go on past behaviour & the AFL have form when it comes to numbers

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:06 pm
by Fred
But wouldn't the amount of clubs and teams be easily checked ?

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:08 pm
by Fred
I will have to expand my weekly tours of seq counting goal posts lol

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:35 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol
None of that changes the fact that it's a compromised comp on field .
No level playing field .
Syd finally got rid of cola ...this year only to have it still there under another name .
When all things are even on field then it's a fair comp
Rl for all its faults has this part of the game covered .

AFL ...basically rigged to ensure new teams & some non heartland teams are successful .

Re: AFL payments to clubs

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:39 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:35 pm
Lol
None of that changes the fact that it's a compromised comp on field .
No level playing field .
Syd finally got rid of cola ...this year only to have it still there under another name .
When all things are even on field then it's a fair comp
Rl for all its faults has this part of the game covered .

AFL ...basically rigged to ensure new teams & some non heartland teams are successful .
No AFL club gets the same assistance as the Broncos. Yes it's off field, but its a major reason why they remain successful year after year, all for ratings.

What assistance are the swas getting now the COLA has gone?