Page 1 of 2
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:45 pm
by leagueiscrap
11 million last season from government hand outs?
that must be a special scheme the government has with the special aid nurses, to get the NRLOL fans out of the basement & to the games!
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:49 pm
by leagueiscrap
for the total revenue recorded for the NRL, does that include the $50 million advance payment from C9 as part of the new broadcast deal?
Phil Rothfield Exclusive: NRL clubs lost a total of $53.4 million last year
The Daily Telegraph
February 23, 2017 11:00pm
NRL clubs lost a staggering total of $53.4 million last year, according to a secret financial document obtained by The Daily Telegraph on the eve of the season kick-off.
It is an embarrassing result for the NRL on the day of its own AGM where it will be revealed the head body also lost more than $2 million last year, despite a $50 million advanced payment on the new TV deal from broadcasters Channel Nine to help the Moore Park administration and struggling clubs
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/subscr ... =anonymous
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:19 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol
How come the only source you can ever seem to post is the DT or slothdield .
Lol
You poor simpleton .
Why do you ignore the AFL handing over vast amounts to struggling clubs but then discount the SYd clubs who have the backing of their leagues club .
It's what they were set up for .
You are just too dumb to understand
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:22 pm
by leagueiscrap
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:50 pm
leagueiscrap wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:49 pm
for the total revenue recorded for the NRL, does that include the $50 million advance payment from C9 as part of the new broadcast deal?
yes.
THE MAJOR REASONS FOR THE INCREASE IN CASH DURING THE YEAR WERE:
The receipt of a $50.0m advance payment in relation to the 2018-2022 broadcast rights
i realise that but the revenue listed for the broadcast money has been pretty consistent for the last 4 years of it, just looking at the break down of the finances the $50 million advance deosnt look like it has been inckuded
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:04 am
by pussycat
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:50 pm
leagueiscrap wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:49 pm
for the total revenue recorded for the NRL, does that include the $50 million advance payment from C9 as part of the new broadcast deal?
yes.
THE MAJOR REASONS FOR THE INCREASE IN CASH DURING THE YEAR WERE:
The receipt of a $50.0m advance payment in relation to the 2018-2022 broadcast rights
According to the Roy Masters article the Ch 9 money went into cash not revenue
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:54 am
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:04 am
The_Wookie wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:50 pm
leagueiscrap wrote: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:49 pm
for the total revenue recorded for the NRL, does that include the $50 million advance payment from C9 as part of the new broadcast deal?
yes.
THE MAJOR REASONS FOR THE INCREASE IN CASH DURING THE YEAR WERE:
The receipt of a $50.0m advance payment in relation to the 2018-2022 broadcast rights
According to the Roy Masters article the Ch 9 money went into cash not revenue
so in other words pissycat, with out the advancement of payment of the broadcast deal the NRLOL would have made a huge loss and that increase in revenue you were churping off about is highly exaggerated

Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:55 am
by pussycat
leagueiscrap wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:54 am
pussycat wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:04 am
According to the Roy Masters article the Ch 9 money went into cash not revenue
so in other words pissycat, with out the advancement of payment of the broadcast deal the NRLOL would have made a huge loss and that increase in revenue you were churping off about is highly exaggerated
It made up part of the $130m cash that the NRL listed as an asset!
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 2:42 pm
by leagueiscrap
is the actual report out? that lists it in assets
maybe the cheque is just taking a while to clear after C9 reported to suffer a large loss for last year
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:00 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yeah that's it

Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:06 pm
by leagueiscrap
ive seen press releases with selected figures released from the AFL & NRL.
usually when the NRLOL one is released you loon create a thread about it & start batting off over the figures in how great it is
given it hasn't been posted up here yet, & i do not spend my time trolling the internet, like you loons do, that is why i asked if its out

Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:36 pm
by pussycat
The_Wookie wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:19 pm
Its included in the assets, and its in the cash flows, but doesnt seem to be in the revenues. Interesting.
Its Broadcast revenue for a contract that's starts next year.
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:46 pm
by pussycat
leagueiscrap wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 2:42 pm
is the actual report out? that lists it in assets
maybe the cheque is just taking a while to clear after C9 reported to suffer a large loss for last year
The AFL takes out a 6 year broadcast deal, gets a loan of $280m and still ends up in the red by $18m

but but the NRL but but but.
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:38 pm
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:46 pm
leagueiscrap wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2017 2:42 pm
is the actual report out? that lists it in assets
maybe the cheque is just taking a while to clear after C9 reported to suffer a large loss for last year
The AFL takes out a 6 year broadcast deal, gets a loan of $280m and still ends up in the red by $18m

but but the NRL but but but.
Do you understand anything about money pissy cat! It's far more complicated than when your special needs nurse hands you your pocket money
Then nrlol took out an advance on next years broadcast money to make their finances look better than what they really are
The AFL brought a stadium, the land value of the stadium is between $1 to $1.3 billion. The stadium is an asset & generates money. That money is money will be classed as revenue for the AFL to keep
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:38 pm
by eelofwest
Since 2012 the NRL revenue has gone from
NRL 2012 185m To 2016 391m adding 206m in revenue in 4 years.
AFL 2011 382m to 2016 569m adding 187m in revenue in 5 years.
NRL more than doubled its revenue in that time. The gap is closing boys.
Re: AFL v NRL Consolidated Revenue 2012-2016
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:46 pm
by leagueiscrap
eelofwest wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:38 pm
Since 2012 the NRL revenue has gone from
NRL 2012 185m To 2016 391m adding 206m in revenue in 4 years.
AFL 2011 382m to 2016 569m adding 187m in revenue in 5 years.
NRL more than doubled its revenue in that time. The gap is closing boys.
That's because it's come from such a low base. The only way the nrlol will raise their revenue much more from here out side of the non broadcast revenue will raise their ticket prices and get bigger crowds! Bahahahaha
The nrlol will never catch the AFL even when not including the purchase of Etihad.