Page 73 of 75
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:37 am
by AFLcrap1
No I don't
Simple fact is we are disadvantaged by having a team from overseas when it comes to ratings .
Yes they are watched in Aust ....reality is their home support is in NZ .
I know where I'm coming from .plain simple facts .
We lose viewers because those viewers are in another country.
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:03 am
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08, 2017 8:20 pm
Terry has a point
Your ramblings are just that
The ratings are what they are .
You can't change them to suit whatever bizarro agenda you have
For example I have never seen anyone in the industry claim the afl GF got 50% extra ratings because of going longer .
It's just some nutter theory made by you because you can't accept reality .
I'm not changing the ratings, I'm giving them context in relation to the claim they prove which sport is the most watched.
As far as anyone in the industry, I've never seen them discuss yearly cumulative figures. All they generally discuss is who wins each time slot
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:49 am
by leeroy*NRL*
a team from another country will usually have lower ratings, as the homes fans are not located in the actually country>>
that is why the warriors play in time zones suited to NZ TIME>>>
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:18 am
by AFLcrap1
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:49 am
a team from another country will usually have lower ratings, as the homes fans are not located in the actually country>>
that is why the warriors play in time zones suited to NZ TIME>>>
Fred just doesn't get it .
If west coke eagles home ratings in WA were not counted in Aust ..would that affect the overall ratings of AFLol ...yes
It's not hard to understand .
Every time the warriors play. ..wether in NZ or in Aust ..their fans in NZ watching the game are not counted in the ratings .
So we are down one teams home fans ratings .
A 5 year old could understand that .
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am
by leeroy*NRL*
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:18 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:49 am
a team from another country will usually have lower ratings, as the homes fans are not located in the actually country>>
that is why the warriors play in time zones suited to NZ TIME>>>
Fred just doesn't get it .
If west coke eagles home ratings in WA were not counted in Aust ..would that affect the overall ratings of AFLol ...yes
It's not hard to understand .
Every time the warriors play. ..wether in NZ or in Aust ..their fans in NZ watching the game are not counted in the ratings .
So we are down one teams home fans ratings .
A 5 year old could understand that .
it is very simple to understand>> its basic numbers
not sure why freddy boy cannot put this into calculations lol
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
by pussycat
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:18 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:49 am
a team from another country will usually have lower ratings, as the homes fans are not located in the actually country>>
that is why the warriors play in time zones suited to NZ TIME>>>
Fred just doesn't get it .
If west coke eagles home ratings in WA were not counted in Aust ..would that affect the overall ratings of AFLol ...yes
It's not hard to understand .
Every time the warriors play. ..wether in NZ or in Aust ..their fans in NZ watching the game are not counted in the ratings .
So we are down one teams home fans ratings .
A 5 year old could understand that .
it is very simple to understand>> its basic numbers
not sure why freddy boy cannot put this into calculations lol
well if it comes down to basic numbers I wouldn't be to surprised considering 100 is half of 150
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:18 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:18 am
Fred just doesn't get it .
If west coke eagles home ratings in WA were not counted in Aust ..would that affect the overall ratings of AFLol ...yes
It's not hard to understand .
Every time the warriors play. ..wether in NZ or in Aust ..their fans in NZ watching the game are not counted in the ratings .
So we are down one teams home fans ratings .
A 5 year old could understand that .
it is very simple to understand>> its basic numbers
not sure why freddy boy cannot put this into calculations lol
well if it comes down to basic numbers I wouldn't be to surprised considering 100 is half of 150
Pussycat, what is 50% of 2 hours? 1 hour
Therefore to go from 2 hours to 3 hours you need a 50% increase. To go from 75 minutes to 150 minutes you need a 100% increase.
What level of education did you get to? Your maths is primary school level, and you still dont know the difference between they're, their and there.
Yet AFLcrap picks on Victorian education. LOL
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:41 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:18 pm
pussycat wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am
it is very simple to understand>> its basic numbers
not sure why freddy boy cannot put this into calculations lol
well if it comes down to basic numbers I wouldn't be to surprised considering 100 is half of 150
Pussycat, what is 50% of 2 hours? 1 hour
Therefore for to go from 2 hours to 3 hours you need a 50% increase. To go from 75 minutes to 150 minutes you need a 100% increase.
What level of education did you get to? Your maths is primary school level, and you still dont know the difference between they're, their and there.
Yet AFLcrap picks on Victorian education. LOL
do you recan if the NRL introduced quarter and 3 quarter time>> ratings would decrease.?
or would the TV Deal rise ?
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:55 pm
by NlolRL
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:41 pm
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:18 pm
pussycat wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
well if it comes down to basic numbers I wouldn't be to surprised considering 100 is half of 150
Pussycat, what is 50% of 2 hours? 1 hour
Therefore for to go from 2 hours to 3 hours you need a 50% increase. To go from 75 minutes to 150 minutes you need a 100% increase.
What level of education did you get to? Your maths is primary school level, and you still dont know the difference between they're, their and there.
Yet AFLcrap picks on Victorian education. LOL
do you recan if the NRL introduced quarter and 3 quarter time>> ratings would decrease.?
or would the TV Deal rise ?
ratings would decrease due to a longer telecast
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:44 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:18 pm
pussycat wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am
it is very simple to understand>> its basic numbers
not sure why freddy boy cannot put this into calculations lol
well if it comes down to basic numbers I wouldn't be to surprised considering 100 is half of 150
Pussycat, what is 50% of 2 hours? 1 hour
Therefore to go from 2 hours to 3 hours you need a 50% increase. To go from 75 minutes to 150 minutes you need a 100% increase.
What level of education did you get to? Your maths is primary school level, and you still dont know the difference between they're, their and there.
Yet AFLcrap picks on Victorian education. LOL
An AFL match lasts 150m. (therefore 1/3 of an AFL game would be 50m) . Therefore 2/3 of an AFL match would be 100m. The length of a Rugby league match is 100m. (therefore the same time for 1 league match = the time for 2/3 of an AFL match) so the difference between the two games is 1/3 or 50m.
What else are you Victorians taught as school? No wonder you think AFL is doing well
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:06 pm
by Fred
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:18 am
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:49 am
a team from another country will usually have lower ratings, as the homes fans are not located in the actually country>>
that is why the warriors play in time zones suited to NZ TIME>>>
Fred just doesn't get it .
If west coke eagles home ratings in WA were not counted in Aust ..would that affect the overall ratings of AFLol ...yes
It's not hard to understand .
Every time the warriors play. ..wether in NZ or in Aust ..their fans in NZ watching the game are not counted in the ratings .
So we are down one teams home fans ratings .
A 5 year old could understand that .
Oh I get it.......
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:07 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol nope
You keep arguing against it .
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:16 pm
by leeroy*NRL*
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:55 pm
leeroy*NRL* wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:41 pm
NlolRL wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:18 pm
Pussycat, what is 50% of 2 hours? 1 hour
Therefore for to go from 2 hours to 3 hours you need a 50% increase. To go from 75 minutes to 150 minutes you need a 100% increase.
What level of education did you get to? Your maths is primary school level, and you still dont know the difference between they're, their and there.
Yet AFLcrap picks on Victorian education. LOL
do you recan if the NRL introduced quarter and 3 quarter time>> ratings would decrease.?
or would the TV Deal rise ?
ratings would decrease due to a longer telecast
it would only be a 15min extension >> with nothing but extra advertising breaks delivering a bigger $$
so there is the positive..
NRL with half time only does help figures >> by how much who knows>> very minimal.
but I doubt having extra break or 2 would see a big decline...
would be very minimal.
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:18 pm
by Fred
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:07 pm
Lol nope
You keep arguing against it .
Cause I’m right! I get you don’t know I’m right therefore I shall argue no more.
Re: 2017 - Rugby League TV Ratings (Rolling totals in OP)
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:29 pm
by AFLcrap1
Fred wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:18 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:07 pm
Lol nope
You keep arguing against it .
Cause I’m right! I get you don’t know I’m right therefore I shall argue no more.
Oh dear .
You can't seem to debate against what I've posted .
I get it
You can't