Page 1 of 1

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:58 am
by leeroy*NRL*
what a JUGGERNAUT this comp has become..

the figures it produces should have no issue eclipsing $50-60mill a year..

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:38 am
by SportFan
I can comfirm Session 2 (Game 1) peaked nationally at 1.45m viewers.

BBL up 10% this season, after just first 3 Games!

The metro figure from Game 2 (Wednesday - Adel vs. Bris) was amazing, highest ever metro for non-final Session 2: 1.045m :)

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:58 pm
by AFLcrap1
It highlights the difference between the two summer codes...cricket & sokka
Massive ratings for cricket on FTA.
Sokka ...struggling to find a FTA broadcaster .

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:22 am
by Beaussie
AFLcrap1 wrote:
It highlights the difference between the two summer codes...cricket & sokka
Massive ratings for cricket on FTA.
Sokka ...struggling to find a FTA broadcaster .
Spot on. Women's cricket rates better than soccer too. lol

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 8:26 am
by Hale
T20 will soon be crickets main format. So this thing will probably only get bigger.

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:49 pm
by Terry
Massive ratings!!! Cricket has the advantage of being the only true national game we have. If CA manage this properly it will cement not only the BBL but test cricket for the next 100 years.

Re: 2016-17 BBL Ratings

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:37 am
by leeroy*NRL*
AMAZING FIGURES ALL UP

a very exciting competition

this comp will eclipse the A LEAGUE DEAL LOL (as predicted)