Page 6 of 7

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 5:17 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:
& those heaps of extra people who are home in prime time have 3-4 other TOP rating shows to choose from .
.
Absolutely. However, compared to sat arvo there are enough extra viewers in prime time for all prime time shows to rate higher.

Put it this way, if the NRL SOO was on Sat arvo do you seriously think WA, SA and VIC would rate nearly as high as SOO does in prime time? I've personally watched SOO quite a few times because I was home and there wasnt much else on. But I would never consider watching it if it was on in the arvo because Ive got better or more important things to do in the arvo

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:21 pm
by pussycat
Everybody that watches will be watching the Grand Final (day or night). Yes, there are more viewers in prime time but there are also more high rating shows. Someone not watching the grand final is someone who would sooner be watching Home & Away or the block. ie they have NFInterest in the AFL Grand Final (there perfectly sane).....




So think up another but but excuse. You've done this one to death.

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:35 pm
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote:
Everybody that watches will be watching the Grand Final (day or night). Yes, there are more viewers in prime time but there are also more high rating shows. Someone not watching the grand final is someone who would sooner be watching Home & Away or the block. ie they have NFInterest in the AFL Grand Final (there perfectly sane).....




So think up another but but excuse. You've done this one to death.
LOL so thats why the swans are the largest football team in NSW :)))

actually pissy cat, the AFL GF had roughly round a 90% of the total viewership, unlike the NRLOL GF. the stats show time and time again that more people watch TV in the evenings hence why its called prime time.

so all the but but excuses you can come up with the NRLOL is number two! :))) more games in prime time, international games, SOO, RLWC etc the broadcasters still pay more for the AFL.
fact is fact

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 11:20 pm
by AFLcrap1
Dumbo ....way Too thick to understand .

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 12:18 pm
by Xman
pussycat wrote:
Everybody that watches will be watching the Grand Final (day or night). Yes, there are more viewers in prime time but there are also more high rating shows. Someone not watching the grand final is someone who would sooner be watching Home & Away or the block. ie they have NFInterest in the AFL Grand Final (there perfectly sane).....




So think up another but but excuse. You've done this one to death.
So you think the NRL soo would rate just as high on Sat arvo as Wednesday night, especially in Vic?

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:44 pm
by Xman
http://indaily.com.au/news/2015/11/30/d ... v-ratings/
The innovation – aimed at boosting crowd figures and interest in the five-day format – was a prime-time ratings hit for the Nine Network across all three days, with an average audience of 2.313 million fans watching Sunday’s night session.

The TV numbers made it Nine’s highest-rating day of cricket in the 2015-16 season.
All coincidence of course. Nothing to do with the fact it was on in prime time

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:48 pm
by AFLcrap1
Once again .
What was it up against

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:52 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Dumbo ....way Too thick to understand .
actually spazza with all the stats that have been posted up between prime time and non prime time & the costing of placing an ad on tv in those different time slots, shows a big difference between the amount of people that watch tv.

its you and fellow basement dwellers that keep coming up with the but but excuses to convince us other wise.
so quite simply your to thick to understand it :thumbleft:

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:56 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Once again .
What was it up against
Sunday Night, which rated near 1 mil
The Biggest Loser

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2015/11/sun ... -2015.html
Note only one program in the top 20 (from what I can see) was non-prime time

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:00 pm
by leagueiscrap
over to you spazza, pissycat and other basement dwellers?

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:06 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol .
How many of the opposition are usual top raters. .

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:57 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol .
How many of the opposition are usual top raters. .
:blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah:
to your jerking off about your top ratings programs, who got more in the broardcast deal?
for a simple H&A season, compared to the NRLOL's H&A, SOO, tests, international, inbreed cup etc.... :\:

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:35 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol so I asked a question & you ranted
****** flog .

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:43 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Rugby League the highest rating sport on TV in Australia, doesn't matter that they have a contract for less years and have less games each round and less players to pay blah blah blah.

LOL but but but rl sold everything they had but but but.

Well no not quite, expansion is still on the table and that yet can have a big effect on the next deal if that card is to be played, it's not going to be given away for nothing. It's in the contract and they are also talking about ch9 showing the best of the new NSW cup competition each week with teams from all over NSW, NZ and Fiji with options to also expand that competition where ever the game is played around Australasia.

Re: Rugby League?

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:29 am
by NRL&NFLweLaughATafl
AFL floggs use any excuse when they get beaten.

NRL has a over 300,000 more fans than AFL on facebook. Then they claim NRL buys their fans.

Pretty much indicates Rugby League will always have more casual fans than AFL.

I guarantee if you count which sport had more viewers of grand finals on a global level. AFL would be left in the dust every time.