Page 3 of 3

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 12:32 pm
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
As I said before and I'll say it again, I'll take the word of the former banker and the head of the NRL over a bunch of wannabe types with an agenda of the likes of you and wookie.
Yep bankers are totally ethical and upstanding members of society - they wouldn't lie! Hahaha ok believe what you like!

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 12:50 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I don't care what they are, they answer to people like themselves that kill over money you dope.

You and your try hard mates in here can continue to rubbish this that and the other, you keep saying it is being looked at, what's that tell you?

They don't know yet, but you fuckwits take it all as gospel that the figures are wrong.

hey, that cliff over there isn't too high, I reckon you can make it, just take my word for it.

derp!

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 1:29 pm
by pussycat
Swans4ever wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
So they are looking.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Worked out what that means yet?
Oh so if the NRL is telling those clubs independent of them there is an investigation into it your not concerned?? Ok Ozzie bury your head in the sand!

Smith wasn't concerned. Nor was Ernst and Young(Australia's leading accounting firm). What they were concerned about however was people who made out they were soldiers.

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 1:33 pm
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I don't care what they are, they answer to people like themselves that kill over money you dope.

You and your try hard mates in here can continue to rubbish this that and the other, you keep saying it is being looked at, what's that tell you?

They don't know yet, but you fuckwits take it all as gospel that the figures are wrong.

hey, that cliff over there isn't too high, I reckon you can make it, just take my word for it.

derp!
I didn't make a big deal of it I asked one question - how would it affect the NRL futures fund

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 9:17 pm
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I don't care what they are, they answer to people like themselves that kill over money you dope.

You and your try hard mates in here can continue to rubbish this that and the other, you keep saying it is being looked at, what's that tell you?

They don't know yet, but you fuckwits take it all as gospel that the figures are wrong.

hey, that cliff over there isn't too high, I reckon you can make it, just take my word for it.

derp!
oi dipshit, david smith doesn't put a stupid pair of glasses on, put the pencil over the ear and pull out the old calculator and punches the sums in to the calcular and come up with the equations himself. a top tier accounting firm would be hired or their own in house accountants.

the NRLOL would be classed as the top tier organisation of their code :mrgreen: :(/ , their annual report would be passed through hands and departments for approval, david smith would not spend all summer tucked away in his office coming up with articles and bright pictures to make the annual report!

its not just a simple typo that David Smith has hit the wrong button on the calculator with. FFS your such a simpleton!


whats funny is the NRLOl has been caught out several times for fudging figures of various kinds, their claimed figure has always been vastly over never under :)))

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 10:32 pm
by Swans4ever
Big discrepancy 50 mil to 20 mil - it's funny but because someone is a businessman somehow they have integrity and can be trusted yet the same sort of businessman managed to keep quiet on Qantas's 2.8 billion loss - hahaha yep a lot of credibility for those type!!!

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 2:57 pm
by leagueiscrap
Swans4ever wrote:
Big discrepancy 50 mil to 20 mil - it's funny but because someone is a businessman somehow they have integrity and can be trusted yet the same sort of businessman managed to keep quiet on Qantas's 2.8 billion loss - hahaha yep a lot of credibility for those type!!!
its funny now the NRLOL have a great habit of vastly over inflating its numbers never under quoting them :(/

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 1:27 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol this thread is a laugh .
Look at the high & mighty attitude of the fumblers .
Looking down their noses at RL supposedly fudging finances.

Yet the aflol has been exposed as doing the same .

Oh my .
The backfire thread strike rate for fumblers is way way above RL posters on here ..

Lol
They should check out their own backyard before pointing the finger .

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 3:48 pm
by pussycat
The NRL in its annual report announced a net surplus of $20m , of the back of $50m operating surplus. What is the point of this thread?
Typical Vicheads trying to make something out of nothing :blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah:

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 7:44 am
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol this thread is a laugh .
Look at the high & mighty attitude of the fumblers .
Looking down their noses at RL supposedly fudging finances.

Yet the aflol has been exposed as doing the same .

Oh my .
The backfire thread strike rate for fumblers is way way above RL posters on here ..

Lol
They should check out their own backyard before pointing the finger .
The difference is spazza the afl one is a news paper article.

The nrlol one the auditors found the mistake in the signed off annual report!

Big fucken difference!
It's funny how you basement dwellers whe. It suits just scream lies lies it's all lies

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:57 am
by pussycat
How long is it Since you've taken your medication ? Get your head out of the sand you delusional Vickhead

The only people that have lied here are the AFL, and if there lying about this then what else is this fraudulant organisation lying about?????????????????

If it was just a newspaper beat up and they really did have 89m in there future fund the AFL would sue the pants of them.

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:17 am
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote:
How long is it Since you've taken your medication ? Get your head out of the sand you delusional Vickhead

The only people that have lied here are the AFL, and if there lying about this then what else is this fraudulant organisation lying about?????????????????

If it was just a newspaper beat up and they really did have 89m in there future fund the AFL would sue the pants of them.
Blah blah read my previous post annual report Cs news paper

Re: NRL's much-vaunted $50 million surplus for the financial year has been overstated by about $30 million.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 2:00 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol why did you ignore wookies .post where he stated the auditors had signed off on the NRL finances ,just like the AFLOL .