Page 1 of 3

melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:33 am
by sydneyfc
so about a month ago i was debating with davey about melbourne victory and he claimed that hey have never recorded a profit in their existence...was gonna reply straight away with this but was too busy and ended up forgetting about it

anyway
2005-06 not known
2006-07 +$100,000 http://www.theage.com.au/news/soccer/ho ... 25798.html
2007-08 +$1.57m http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/victo ... 1118399289
2008-09 - unknown loss
2009-10 -$328,000 / $13m revenue http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/payo ... 1p5mi.html
2010-11 -$1.47m / $13.1m revenue http://www.brw.com.au/p/sections/featur ... mr1mCr2kOP
2011-12 -$286,770 / $13.1m revenue http://www.afr.com/p/lifestyle/sport/vi ... xj0aHNkJLN
2012-13 +$255,844 / $14.4m revenue http://www.afr.com/p/lifestyle/sport/vi ... xj0aHNkJLN
2013-14 +$934,000 / $16.2m revenue http://www.afr.com/p/lifestyle/sport/tw ... 9rYdCjMEdP
2014-15 tba
question for wook in particular but anyone can have a say - how does victory compare to other clubs in melbourne, not necessarily the AFL ones, but the other codes? do they get a pass mark in your opinion?

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 12:40 pm
by leagueiscrap
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:08 pm
by post_hoc
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:
How then or why then would they buy a 20% stake, in Melbourne City?

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:12 pm
by Raiderdave
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

:(/ :_<> :lol:

Poor old dumbo
Lies & bullshit are his trade mark
Well
That & metho burps & needing a new keyboard every week after bashing & mashing the previous one into oblivion in a jealous rage :lol: :_<> :lol:

Whered yr team go bomber ? 8-[

:(/

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:17 pm
by leagueiscrap
Raiderdave wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

:(/ :_<> :lol:

Poor old dumbo
Lies & bullshit are his trade mark
Well
That & metho burps & needing a new keyboard every week after bashing & mashing the previous one into oblivion in a jealous rage :lol: :_<> :lol:

Whered yr team go bomber ? 8-[

:(/
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
even David Smith has admitted the storm are a financial basket case, more funny when you consider the lower costs of running an NRL side :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:09 pm
by sydneyfc
i have no doubt the AFL clubs would smash the victory when it comes to revenue and profit

more wanted a comparison with other codes such as RL and union than anything

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:13 pm
by sydneyfc
the storm have received something like $50m extra in funding from the nrl in the last 10+ years as well ontop of the 7.5m grant for the salary cap

if you remove the 7.5m and the ~4m a year extra they get from the nrl it's really embarrassing that they haven't ever turned a profit...my club might not have mad a profit either but we don't get extra bandaid funding like the storm do, neither do the victory

so i guess after the AFL clubs, the victory are probably victorias most successful club :\:

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:00 am
by leagueiscrap
sydneyfc wrote:
the storm have received something like $50m extra in funding from the nrl in the last 10+ years as well ontop of the 7.5m grant for the salary cap

if you remove the 7.5m and the ~4m a year extra they get from the nrl it's really embarrassing that they haven't ever turned a profit...my club might not have mad a profit either but we don't get extra bandaid funding like the storm do, neither do the victory

so i guess after the AFL clubs, the victory are probably victorias most successful club :\:
the basement dwellers haven't been to keen to comment :-k

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:04 am
by AFLsforPussies
leagueiscrap wrote:
sydneyfc wrote:
the storm have received something like $50m extra in funding from the nrl in the last 10+ years as well ontop of the 7.5m grant for the salary cap

if you remove the 7.5m and the ~4m a year extra they get from the nrl it's really embarrassing that they haven't ever turned a profit...my club might not have mad a profit either but we don't get extra bandaid funding like the storm do, neither do the victory

so i guess after the AFL clubs, the victory are probably victorias most successful club :\:
the basement dwellers haven't been to keen to comment :-k
Is a well known fact that quite often more people watch rugby league in Melbourne than AFL in Sydney so even if there is a so called loss.. The TV revenue NRL makes would covers club losses.

You AFL wusses have being talking the storms demise for years lol.. Has it happened?? Noooo

Keep bullshitting as I know it makes you feel better. Meanwhile no TV network even wanted your AFL international cup.

That is how shit AFL is. They have only one Televised competion. While Rugby League has

4 NATIONS
STATE OF ORIGIN
WORLD CLUB CHALLENGE
RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD CUP
NRL COMP
SUPER LEAGUE COMP
CITY VS COUNTY

Your shit little AFL sport can't even get another nation to play the same game so you have to create a hybid abortion against Ireland :(/

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 10:29 am
by ParraEelsNRL
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

Do you Ever get anything right?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5857630482


Despite the current uproar, Melbourne Storm's latest accounts reveal the embattled club to be in a sound financial position, having turned its previous year's $967,000 loss into a $1.6 million profit.

Dumbarse.

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:03 am
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

Do you Ever get anything right?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5857630482


Despite the current uproar, Melbourne Storm's latest accounts reveal the embattled club to be in a sound financial position, having turned its previous year's $967,000 loss into a $1.6 million profit.

Dumbarse.
Storm’s new owners face five years of losses
OHN STENSHOLT
The consortium of private businessmen that has bought NRL club Melbourne Storm from News Ltd faces another five years of financial losses before the club breaks even.

Incoming Storm chief executive Mark Evans said the club, which cost News an estimated $75 million in losses in its 15-year history, had a plan to break even in “four to five years”.

Though Mr Evans would not reveal the identity of those in the consortium besides incoming chairman Bart Campbell, a sports entertainment executive from New Zealand, The Australian Financial Review understands the other three investors are Jayco Caravans owner and BRW Rich List member Gerry Ryan, Sportsbet co-founder Matthew Tripp and a businessman with links to the entertainment industry from New Zealand.

Mr Ryan is a former Storm director, who was forced to step down in 2010 by News when the club was discovered to have been cheating the NRL salary cap for several years. The Storm was subsequently fined heavily and stripped of its 2007 and 2009 premierships,

Several directors, including Mr Ryan, had attempted to take legal action against the NRL, then half-owned by News. It is understood News will hand over the club to the consortium for nothing, or for a small token sum, although Mr Evans would not comment on terms of the deal.

The sale means News’s only involvement in rugby league is its 66 per cent stake in the Brisbane Broncos. News has spent more than $700 million on the sport since the 1997 Super League war that split rugby league.

The Storm’s new owners will have access to the guaranteed $20 million funding from the Australian Rugby League Commission for the next five years negotiated when News gave up its half-ownership of rugby league at the beginning of 2012.

Mr Campbell, a former barrister in the High Court of New Zealand, is the primary shareholder; the other shareholders would be announced at a Melbourne function in two weeks. Mr Evans is a former CEO of English rugby union club Harlequins and was once coach of London side Saracens.

FINANCIAL BURDEN
The Storm has long been a successful enterprise on the field, winning its latest premiership last year, but has also been a financial burden for News.

The Storm has cut its annual losses from between at least $4 million and $6 million to closer to $2 million in recent years under departing CEO Ron Gauci, who has grown crowd and corporate hospitality numbers. The club has signed 15,000 members this season.

Mr Evans said the Storm would try to find new revenue sources, including from overseas and Australian sponsors and a better stadium deal with the Victorian government, the owner of AAMI Park.

“What the group hopes to bring is operation expertise and a lot of contacts in Australia, Asia and further afield that gives you access to financial support that you may not have been able to access before,” he said.

It could also investigate taking home matches interstate or overseas in exchange for large match fees, although that would require a change to its contract with the Victorian government. :lol: :lol: :lol:


even David Smith has stated the Melbourne storm financial mess needs to be fixed up :))) :)))

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:05 am
by leagueiscrap
AFLsforPussies wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
sydneyfc wrote:
the storm have received something like $50m extra in funding from the nrl in the last 10+ years as well ontop of the 7.5m grant for the salary cap

if you remove the 7.5m and the ~4m a year extra they get from the nrl it's really embarrassing that they haven't ever turned a profit...my club might not have mad a profit either but we don't get extra bandaid funding like the storm do, neither do the victory

so i guess after the AFL clubs, the victory are probably victorias most successful club :\:
the basement dwellers haven't been to keen to comment :-k
Is a well known fact that quite often more people watch rugby league in Melbourne than AFL in Sydney so even if there is a so called loss.. The TV revenue NRL makes would covers club losses.

You AFL wusses have being talking the storms demise for years lol.. Has it happened?? Noooo

Keep bullshitting as I know it makes you feel better. Meanwhile no TV network even wanted your AFL international cup.

That is how shit AFL is. They have only one Televised competion. While Rugby League has

4 NATIONS
STATE OF ORIGIN
WORLD CLUB CHALLENGE
RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD CUP
NRL COMP
SUPER LEAGUE COMP
CITY VS COUNTY

Your shit little AFL sport can't even get another nation to play the same game so you have to create a hybid abortion against Ireland :(/
your little sport only can because of Union, :))) something it still plays second fiddle to in nearly every country where Rugby is player! :thumbleft:




4 NATIONS
STATE OF ORIGIN
WORLD CLUB CHALLENGE
RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD CUP
NRL COMP
SUPER LEAGUE COMP
CITY VS COUNTY
& the NRL still has the lowest non broardcast revenue :lol:
so many events, that doesnt make any money :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:09 am
by Raiderdave
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

Do you Ever get anything right?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5857630482


Despite the current uproar, Melbourne Storm's latest accounts reveal the embattled club to be in a sound financial position, having turned its previous year's $967,000 loss into a $1.6 million profit.



Dumbarse.
:(/ :lol: :_<>

Poor old dumbo
Bashin n mashin those keys

Considered too much of a ****** even for derpball cultists :(/ :_<> :lol:

Whered yr team go bomber ? 8-[
:(/ :_<> :lol:

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:11 am
by leagueiscrap
Raiderdave wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
there is a list of most of the AFL clubs from the 2013 season
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... e.1037934/

in that 16 million from the victory does it include and distribution money from the A league commission? (i haven't read all of the articles)

but on the bright side the victory are doing better than the Melbourne Storm, they are a financial mess & have been for over a decade, never turning a profit :lol:

Do you Ever get anything right?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5857630482


Despite the current uproar, Melbourne Storm's latest accounts reveal the embattled club to be in a sound financial position, having turned its previous year's $967,000 loss into a $1.6 million profit.



Dumbarse.
:(/ :lol: :_<>

Poor old dumbo
Bashin n mashin those keys

Considered too much of a ****** even for derpball cultists :(/ :_<> :lol:

Whered yr team go bomber ? 8-[
:(/ :_<> :lol:
http://www.afr.com/p/business/marketing ... eJPfXNDJFP
he consortium of private businessmen that has bought NRL club Melbourne Storm from News Ltd faces another five years of financial losses before the club breaks even.

Incoming Storm chief executive Mark Evans said the club, which cost News an estimated $75 million in losses in its 15-year history, had a plan to break even in “four to five years”.

Though Mr Evans would not reveal the identity of those in the consortium besides incoming chairman Bart Campbell, a sports entertainment executive from New Zealand, The Australian Financial Review understands the other three investors are Jayco Caravans owner and BRW Rich List member Gerry Ryan, Sportsbet co-founder Matthew Tripp and a businessman with links to the entertainment industry from New Zealand.

Mr Ryan is a former Storm director, who was forced to step down in 2010 by News when the club was discovered to have been cheating the NRL salary cap for several years. The Storm was subsequently fined heavily and stripped of its 2007 and 2009 premierships,

Several directors, including Mr Ryan, had attempted to take legal action against the NRL, then half-owned by News. It is understood News will hand over the club to the consortium for nothing, or for a small token sum, although Mr Evans would not comment on terms of the deal.

The sale means News’s only involvement in rugby league is its 66 per cent stake in the Brisbane Broncos. News has spent more than $700 million on the sport since the 1997 Super League war that split rugby league.

The Storm’s new owners will have access to the guaranteed $20 million funding from the Australian Rugby League Commission for the next five years negotiated when News gave up its half-ownership of rugby league at the beginning of 2012.

Mr Campbell, a former barrister in the High Court of New Zealand, is the primary shareholder; the other shareholders would be announced at a Melbourne function in two weeks. Mr Evans is a former CEO of English rugby union club Harlequins and was once coach of London side Saracens.

FINANCIAL BURDEN
The Storm has long been a successful enterprise on the field, winning its latest premiership last year, but has also been a financial burden for News.

The Storm has cut its annual losses from between at least $4 million and $6 million to closer to $2 million in recent years under departing CEO Ron Gauci, who has grown crowd and corporate hospitality numbers. The club has signed 15,000 members this season.

Mr Evans said the Storm would try to find new revenue sources, including from overseas and Australian sponsors and a better stadium deal with the Victorian government, the owner of AAMI Park.

“What the group hopes to bring is operation expertise and a lot of contacts in Australia, Asia and further afield that gives you access to financial support that you may not have been able to access before,” he said.

It could also investigate taking home matches interstate or overseas in exchange for large match fees, although that would require a change to its contract with the Victorian government.



even talking about, taking matches over seas :lol: :lol: :lol:
no one likes your shit game out side of NSW & QLD :\:

Re: melbourne victory financial history

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 2:23 pm
by AFLcrap1
Does not matter what you post Dumbo,to try to deflect .
You once again made a claim .
Parra showed you were wrong again.
So you try to deflect.

Can you ever get anything right.
Stop the metho guzzling & do some research before you start mashing the keys.