Talking Footy

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

then delete that bit you twat

the rest is as legit as Bearsy's thread
I asked wheres the interest & its no more less an opinion then that Dickheads ....but because I'm a Leaguie ........... my whole thread gone !!

put it back up or delete Bearsy's thread for the same reasons
lack of proof

He Claimed .... CLAIMED .. theres no interest in NRL in WA

he'd better prove it
or its the entire thread gone !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

then delete that bit you twat

the rest is as legit as Bearsy's thread
I asked wheres the interest & its no more less an opinion then that Dickheads ....but because I'm a Leaguie ........... my whole thread gone !!

put it back up or delete Bearsy's thread for the same reasons
lack of proof

He Claimed .... CLAIMED .. theres no interest in NRL in WA

he'd better prove it
or its the entire thread gone !!

His claim is clearly a subjective opinion because there is obviously a level of support even if its very low. Your claim was specific but without any proof. Sorry, don't blame me. This is what the overwhelming voted for.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

then delete that bit you twat

the rest is as legit as Bearsy's thread
I asked wheres the interest & its no more less an opinion then that Dickheads ....but because I'm a Leaguie ........... my whole thread gone !!

put it back up or delete Bearsy's thread for the same reasons
lack of proof

He Claimed .... CLAIMED .. theres no interest in NRL in WA

he'd better prove it
or its the entire thread gone !!

His claim is clearly a subjective opinion because there is obviously a level of support even if its very low. Your claim was specific but without any proof. Sorry, don't blame me. This is what the overwhelming voted for.

THEN REMOVE THE CLAIM YOU COCKHEAD
NOT THE THREAD
ITS AS LEGIT AS BEARSY"S


or
REMOVE BEARSY"S TOO
&
try & be a half decent moderator for once in your life

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

then delete that bit you twat

the rest is as legit as Bearsy's thread
I asked wheres the interest & its no more less an opinion then that Dickheads ....but because I'm a Leaguie ........... my whole thread gone !!

put it back up or delete Bearsy's thread for the same reasons
lack of proof

He Claimed .... CLAIMED .. theres no interest in NRL in WA

he'd better prove it
or its the entire thread gone !!

His claim is clearly a subjective opinion because there is obviously a level of support even if its very low. Your claim was specific but without any proof. Sorry, don't blame me. This is what the overwhelming voted for.

THEN REMOVE THE CLAIM YOU COCKHEAD
NOT THE THREAD
ITS AS LEGIT AS BEARSY"S


or
REMOVE BEARSY"S TOO
&
try & be a half decent moderator for once in your life

You knew the rules and you post clearly broke them. If you want someone to blame look in the mirror.

I retread Beaussies OP. Tell me what he claims that needs proving

Most likely up your asssss

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Im sorry

but if my post has been removed under the new rules
then Bearsy's must go to

the NRL has a proven track record of higher interest in WA ... then the midgets in Western Sydney

either restore my thread
or delete Bearsy's
cos
It'll be on if something isn't done

we're already seeing fumbling Bias with these new rules & again.. Xmans inability to moderate properly !!

Your post claimed the Giants have home crowds of 5000 but didnt come with proof, whether you think there is proof or not. Make a claim like that and without proof its deleted

then delete that bit you twat

the rest is as legit as Bearsy's thread
I asked wheres the interest & its no more less an opinion then that Dickheads ....but because I'm a Leaguie ........... my whole thread gone !!

put it back up or delete Bearsy's thread for the same reasons
lack of proof

He Claimed .... CLAIMED .. theres no interest in NRL in WA

he'd better prove it
or its the entire thread gone !!

His claim is clearly a subjective opinion because there is obviously a level of support even if its very low. Your claim was specific but without any proof. Sorry, don't blame me. This is what the overwhelming voted for.

THEN REMOVE THE CLAIM YOU COCKHEAD
NOT THE THREAD
ITS AS LEGIT AS BEARSY"S


or
REMOVE BEARSY"S TOO
&
try & be a half decent moderator for once in your life

Whaaaa, Whaaaa, whaaaa. Have a sook princess!

I reckon! Dave's meds must have run out again!