Talking Footy

NRL - 7

AFL - 2

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

it isn't a contest anymore folks

Thanks for that captain obvious .............

When the NRL signed the last Tv contract we didn't have 7 programs in the top 40 nationally. Im sure it's something the networks will pay attention to next contract though . Likewise I'm sure the TV execs will note that the AFL only held 2.

The_Wookie wrote:

well ill be damned, thats why you guys got so much more than the AFL in media rights cash right? Oh wait.

we were 280 Million behind going in
& 50 Million in front after

that's a whoopin sonny

The_Wookie wrote:

only if you fail at maths and reality, which you have so far demonstrated time and time again. You make less from broadcast deals. Its that simple.

Maybe slightly less maybe, that is your best case scenario. But Grant negotiated a % of Telstra's wiz bang app - the one that been downloaded 800 000 times since last April.

don't you just love fumblers & their idiocy

they told us in 2012
assured us

that we could not get within cooee of their rights deal
no way
no how


its just a pipe dream
its simply impossible


in 2014
their tune has changed to

so
why didn't you only get the same as us & not more !!









>



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
what a pack of dix :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

The_Wookie wrote:

only if you fail at maths and reality, which you have so far demonstrated time and time again. You make less from broadcast deals. Its that simple.

1.2m for a 16 team comp

1.25m for a 18 team comp with 2 expansion sides draining the coffers like no tomorrow.

Somehow i think our deal is far superior on the cash side of things.

Now when the NRL adds 2 more teams then you will see the cash rumbling in and you will weep my friend.......

So yes 1.2b + NZ money is bigger than 1.25b

The_Wookie wrote:

Ill say it again because your apparently unable to comprehend it

The annual reports - which include the NZ deal (which was announced in march 2013, well within the 2013 Annual report window) - say otherwise. Until you can show me an official NRL document that says otherwise, your talking out your backside.

what where you saying about pipe dreams assssssssssssraider,

The_Wookie wrote:

Ill say it again because your apparently unable to comprehend it

The annual reports - which include the NZ deal (which was announced in march 2013, well within the 2013 Annual report window) - say otherwise. Until you can show me an official NRL document that says otherwise, your talking out your backside.

NRL Annual report : Broadcast Revenue $221.3m,


AFL Annual Report : Broadcast Revenue + AFL media Revenue = $234.4 .

diffeence of $13.1m ......AFL Broadcast revenue ??????????????????????????????????

It was part of the joint venture the two parties agreed to, as part of the rites deal, I have no dispute there, Its the amount of the deal I dispute - As does the Financial Review - as does Grant.

Grant is quoted in several articles, saying that the amount was double the previous deal. The previous deal was $90m and was for 6 years.

This article comes from an AFL chat site. I thought was interesting.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2 ... ed.983434/