Talking Footy

under new forum interpretations
I can't find any evidence to disprove this

so I'm right

How about your real claims such as AFL only popular in Melbourne ????

Raiderdave wrote:

under new forum interpretations
I can't find any evidence to disprove this

so I'm right

No, you of course don't get it

This is simple to disprove. TV ratings, crowd figures, participation rates and media stories in Victoria show you are wrong. Further proof youre an idiot.

Close thread/

Awwwwww, Xman! I wanted to show links and you put a stop to it!

This is the thing. I'm actually doing what Dave should be doing. Providing evidence that prove claims.

He's just burying himself further and further. Anyone want to share my spade and help him out as I am?

Oh but that doesn't disprove my claim
& the 100 links stating anything else that have been posted over & over & over .... can just be ignored like NRLcrap ignores things & keeps stating things that he knows are wrong

these are the new forum rules don't cha know
so I my claim stands

Phelpsy wrote:

How about your real claims such as AFL only popular in Melbourne ????

well at least I did prove this
but ya don't even need evidence anymore to say what eva the fuck ya like :_<> :_<>

these are the new forum interpretations afterall

Raiderdave wrote:

Oh but that doesn't disprove my claim
& the 100 links stating anything else that have been posted over & over & over .... can just be ignored like NRLcrap ignores things & keeps stating things that he knows are wrong

these are the new forum rules don't cha know
so I my claim stands

How exactly don't they disprove your claim? These are key indicators showing the AFL is far far more popular. You got any counter evidence?

Raiderdave wrote:

Oh but that doesn't disprove my claim
& the 100 links stating anything else that have been posted over & over & over .... can just be ignored like NRLcrap ignores things & keeps stating things that he knows are wrong

these are the new forum rules don't cha know
so I my claim stands

I don't know that they are wrong, because you haven't provided any links for me to ignore!

And seeing as you are ignoring Xman's statement, I'll give you two links that prove you wrong - simply showing the difference between the Storm's crowds and the crowds of the lowest ranked AFL team in Victoria, the Demons;

http://stats.rleague.com/AFL/crowds/melbourne.html
http://stats.rleague.com/rl/crowds/melbourne.html

So, Dave, I'll make an offer to you. You show links that show that junior rugby league is played in Victoria, SA, WA and Tasmania - and you can tell me which quarter of my signature I should delete. Or you can tell me to remove my avatar. Even if the links aren't reliable in our eyes (no doubt you'll say that about the two Wikipedia links I used elsewhere).

I'm with dave on this, RL rules Victoria because we said so, we don't need to provide links or any factual information at all .

Maybe if others started putting in proper evidence, we may find their influence beneficial and that might help us in the long run eh?

You'd think the mods and admin would lead the way, but no, they are actually the ones at fault. Sooooo, that means RL rules Victoria, end of.

You're calling that stats site improper evidence? > > >

When do vfl fans take any RL site with stats as 100% right, don't you guys take everything to do with RL with a pinch of salt?

Haha.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Oh but that doesn't disprove my claim
& the 100 links stating anything else that have been posted over & over & over .... can just be ignored like NRLcrap ignores things & keeps stating things that he knows are wrong

these are the new forum rules don't cha know
so I my claim stands

So, Dave, I'll make an offer to you. You show links that show that junior rugby league is played in Victoria, SA, WA and Tasmania - and you can tell me which quarter of my signature I should delete. Or you can tell me to remove my avatar. Even if the links aren't reliable in our eyes (no doubt you'll say that about the two Wikipedia links I used elsewhere).

nah fuck off
you had your chance

its open slather now ... say what the fuck ya like about anything
make stuff up .. say ya can't find anything to disprove it .... & it stands

No it doesn't stand, because unlike you I provide evidence that SHOWS that you are wrong!

And you call me a skirt lifting sheila? That's you, you gutless wonder. Nothing you say stands because it is so far from the truth it's unreal. At least when I speak it resembles the truth.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

No it doesn't stand, because unlike you I provide evidence that SHOWS that you are wrong!

And you call me a skirt lifting sheila? That's you, you gutless wonder. Nothing you say stands because it is so far from the truth it's unreal. At least when I speak it resembles the truth.

Bullshit .it resembles this.

Dhjsbwdie%Ah#8NU94nn$d@u## u#(8nd#nYe

Wha...? Who said that? Oh sorry it was my imagination. Carry on.