Talking Footy

under new forum interpretations
I can't find any evidence to disprove this

so I'm right

Here's evidence;

http://stats.rleague.com/AFL/crowds/summary.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... _Australia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... _the_world

Notice that I provide evidence. Someone I know doesn't do this. Gee I wonder who?

That was hard....

You've no idea how hard, Xman!

It's true, really it is.

All evidence points out that no one knows of this little Victorian oddity outside of Australia.

LOL.

Ignoring the links as well, ParraEel?

Link to a RL site, I thought they weren't to be trusted?

Well scrap those made up numbers then, it never happened.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Here's evidence;

http://stats.rleague.com/AFL/crowds/summary.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... _Australia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... _the_world

Notice that I provide evidence. Someone I know doesn't do this. Gee I wonder who?

oh that doesn't prove anything disphit :_<> :_<> :_<>
if the claimant can't find any evidence
then the claim is true apparently .... everything else is ignored

It proves plenty, Dave! I provided links that you can't counter.

You don't provide any links to back your claims up.