Talking Footy

under new forum interpretations
I can't find any evidence to disprove this

so I'm right

Yep ,you can claim whatever ou like,without any proof at all & others have to disprove it.

http://web.archive.org/web/200606250817 ... ticleid=37
http://monumentaustralia.org.au/themes/ ... rules-game

This is too easy!

Well it wouldn't be Indian that's for sure

That's true! It's dinki di Aussie!

Anglo Irish.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Anglo Irish.

no no

Japanese
I can't find anything that says it wasn't invented in Japan
so
this claim of mine stands

I have proven that it was invented in Australia, Dave, with links.

So it can't have been invented anywhere else, let alone Japan.

Or are you suggesting that Japan is in Australia?

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I have proven that it was invented in Australia, Dave, with links.

?

nah
Japan

theres nothing saying it WASN"T invented at exactly the same time in Japan as well ...
so Im standing by my claim & that's all you have to do now
say anything .... & be fucked provin it

&
that's that then

I proved it, you goose.

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I have proven that it was invented in Australia, Dave, with links.

?

nah
Japan

theres nothing saying it WASN"T invented at exactly the same time in Japan as well ...
so Im standing by my claim & that's all you have to do now
say anything .... & be fucked provin it

&
that's that then

Claim all you want, evidence has been shown it was invented in Australia which trumps your lack of evidence.


This is too easy

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I proved it, you goose.

You couldnt suffiently prove that water is wet u fucktard

Look who's talking!

I'm turning Japanese I think I'm turning Japanese I really think so ... ....




With 1 white parent

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I'm turning Japanese I think I'm turning Japanese I really think so ... ....




With 1 white parent

Racist