Talking Footy

Please vote on wether NRLcrap1 should be forced to take a wager

He Claims there are no RL juniors (6-16) in the states of Victoria , Western Australia , South Australia & Tasmania

not one
I said there are.... of course

He said prove it

I said I will if you ban yourself ....you think you are right so back this up with this wager
& if I can't prove it
well I'll ban myself

he said no
but continues to state there are no RL juniors in the above states

so
who thinks he should do one of the above

He should but the spineless **** wont
But when you are so wrong about nearly everything you post then I suppose you would be shy about wagering.

I clarified it saying that the EVIDENCE (or lack of it) shows no juniors. I simple agree with that evidence.

I voted but this is a useless poll and the thread should be locked in my opinion. What a whiner Dave is!

AFLcrap1 wrote:

He should but the spineless **** wont
But when you are so wrong about nearly everything you post then I suppose you would be shy about wagering.

that statement pretty sums up everything what you dipshits are, aflcrap & raiderdave

NRLCrap1 wrote:

I clarified it saying that the EVIDENCE (or lack of it) shows no juniors. I simple agree with that evidence.

I voted but this is a useless poll and the thread should be locked in my opinion. What a whiner Dave is!

take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila

good to see our fumblers agree with us about what they do when challenged :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

This is getting out of hand and stops here.