Talking Footy

hmmmmm
so .... Swines now claims that it was an opinion all along despite no such qualification anywhere in the opening post
& none anywhere further along in the thread when the list was challenged as ridiculous & surely not the effort of a paid professional


lets have a closer look at the opening post shall we




Top five NATIONAL events based on relevance and interest across the WHOLE of Australia not just two states.

No 1. MELBOURNE Cup
No.2. Australian open
No.3. Australia v England test series
No.4. AFL Grand final
No.5. ANZAC day Coll v Ess

Just missing
No.6. F1 Albert Park

(For the record - Bledisloe cup No.7, Socceroos WC Qualifiers No.8 and Moto GO No.9, then NRL GF and SOO at 10, 11, 12 and 13 respectively)

so as if this **** effort isn't enough
he then extends the list past 5
( like hes reading it off another source )... stating who just missies out ... &.. ... for the record .... ... for the record >
who makes up the rest of the top 10
right out to 13

13

ahhhhh...who made it in at 14 & 15 Swines ?
ummmmmm..... how big was the list .... 20?..... 50?
why didn't you post it all ?
>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
He is definitely trying to pass this off as an official list & just hoped forum members wouldn't be too cynical & challenge its authenticity

I mean
he had ample opportunity to state its just his list & nothing else
but no ....

he is a lying twat
a fraudulent *****
& only he'd be stupid enough to try this shit on & expect he could get away with it :_<> :_<> :_<>

this is a gold medal winning effort as the stupidest most ******** & worst thread for 2013
I mean
jesus mary & joseph folks

& Swines also has the sliver & bronze sown up too


now
lets stand by for hollow threats of retribution & acts of manly toughness in the confines of the boxing ring by our resident keyboard warrior
who's boxing abilities are no doubt as legit as this thread of his & its contents :_<> :_<> :_<>

As if you are the minder of integrity around here, Dave!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

As if you are the minder of integrity around here, Dave!

Well you wouldn't get a look in ya fucking IMBA.

Raiderdave wrote:

hmmmmm
so .... Swines now claims that it was an opinion all along despite no such qualification anywhere in the opening post
& none anywhere further along in the thread when the list was challenged as ridiculous & surely not the effort of a paid professional


lets have a closer look at the opening post shall we




Top five NATIONAL events based on relevance and interest across the WHOLE of Australia not just two states.

No 1. MELBOURNE Cup
No.2. Australian open
No.3. Australia v England test series
No.4. AFL Grand final
No.5. ANZAC day Coll v Ess

Just missing
No.6. F1 Albert Park

(For the record - Bledisloe cup No.7, Socceroos WC Qualifiers No.8 and Moto GO No.9, then NRL GF and SOO at 10, 11, 12 and 13 respectively)

so as if this **** effort isn't enough
he then extends the list past 5
( like hes reading it off another source )... stating who just missies out ... &.. ... for the record .... ... for the record >
who makes up the rest of the top 10
right out to 13

13

ahhhhh...who made it in at 14 & 15 Swines ?
ummmmmm..... how big was the list .... 20?..... 50?
why didn't you post it all ?
>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
He is definitely trying to pass this off as an official list & just hoped forum members wouldn't be too cynical & challenge its authenticity

I mean
he had ample opportunity to state its just his list & nothing else
but no ....

he is a lying twat
a fraudulent *****
& only he'd be stupid enough to try this shit on & expect he could get away with it :_<> :_<> :_<>

this is a gold medal winning effort as the stupidest most ******** & worst thread for 2013
I mean
jesus mary & joseph folks

& Swines also has the sliver & bronze sown up too


now
lets stand by for hollow threats of retribution & acts of manly toughness in the confines of the boxing ring by our resident keyboard warrior
who's boxing abilities are no doubt as legit as this thread of his & its contents :_<> :_<> :_<>

Wagga Wagga Police boys club gym can be booked - so don't talk act! Your a big brave RL fan after all and I'm a puny weedy AFL fan - don't talk a good game prove to us your not a coward - set a date!

As for the top five all you RL fans claimed it was legit I offered it as an opinion - based on relevance nationally across Australia - it is unaltered!

I'm just wondering what Swines is trying to prove? Is he trying to say that he is a tough guy? Is he trying to say that because he is a tough guy he must be right? Are we to assume from his bravado that he is a hulking 25 year old, 6' 4" heavyweight boxer that can clean up anyone that doesn't agree with them? Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

Swines attitude reminds me of a quote.

“Jane! will you hear reason?' (he stooped and approached his lips to my ear) 'because, if you won't, I'll try violence.”
― Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

hmmmmm
so .... Swines now claims that it was an opinion all along despite no such qualification anywhere in the opening post
& none anywhere further along in the thread when the list was challenged as ridiculous & surely not the effort of a paid professional


lets have a closer look at the opening post shall we




Top five NATIONAL events based on relevance and interest across the WHOLE of Australia not just two states.

No 1. MELBOURNE Cup
No.2. Australian open
No.3. Australia v England test series
No.4. AFL Grand final
No.5. ANZAC day Coll v Ess

Just missing
No.6. F1 Albert Park

(For the record - Bledisloe cup No.7, Socceroos WC Qualifiers No.8 and Moto GO No.9, then NRL GF and SOO at 10, 11, 12 and 13 respectively)

so as if this **** effort isn't enough
he then extends the list past 5
( like hes reading it off another source )... stating who just missies out ... &.. ... for the record .... ... for the record >
who makes up the rest of the top 10
right out to 13

13

ahhhhh...who made it in at 14 & 15 Swines ?
ummmmmm..... how big was the list .... 20?..... 50?
why didn't you post it all ?
>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
He is definitely trying to pass this off as an official list & just hoped forum members wouldn't be too cynical & challenge its authenticity

I mean
he had ample opportunity to state its just his list & nothing else
but no ....

he is a lying twat
a fraudulent *****
& only he'd be stupid enough to try this shit on & expect he could get away with it :_<> :_<> :_<>

this is a gold medal winning effort as the stupidest most ******** & worst thread for 2013
I mean
jesus mary & joseph folks

& Swines also has the sliver & bronze sown up too


now
lets stand by for hollow threats of retribution & acts of manly toughness in the confines of the boxing ring by our resident keyboard warrior
who's boxing abilities are no doubt as legit as this thread of his & its contents :_<> :_<> :_<>

Wagga Wagga Police boys club gym can be booked - so don't talk act! Your a big brave RL fan after all and I'm a puny weedy AFL fan - don't talk a good game prove to us your not a coward - set a date!

!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

you want summa this

huh

huh

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
jesus
what a pathetic ****

As for the top five all you RL fans claimed it was legit I offered it as an opinion - based on relevance nationally across Australia - it is unaltered

:_<> :_<>

you tried to pass it off as a legit list
& once again

as per most things in your pathetic life
you again failed miserably

I mean
whats with a top 5

then an offering for what just missed out .... ( oh dear this event must have been so upset to miss out on .. umm ahhh .. your list )
then the rest of this..errrr ... list .....that you failed to post at all >

10th
11th
12th

&


13th >



ummm

are you not all there or something

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

like I said'

stupidest thread of the year on this forum
I'd get a start on any forum probably

is yours dickhead
well done :_<> :_<>

No, what's stupid was your reaction to it, Dave!

So tell us, honestly. In your opinion what are the top five national sporting events based on relevance and interest across the whole country? That means all six states and the two territories.

That's the way you should have reacted. But in your juvenile stupor you just decided on the typical Dave-esq abuse.

MarkZZZ wrote:

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

So tell me what your opinion is of this?

http://www.tv.com/shows/bully-beatdown/watch/

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

hmmmmm
so .... Swines now claims that it was an opinion all along despite no such qualification anywhere in the opening post
& none anywhere further along in the thread when the list was challenged as ridiculous & surely not the effort of a paid professional


lets have a closer look at the opening post shall we




Top five NATIONAL events based on relevance and interest across the WHOLE of Australia not just two states.

No 1. MELBOURNE Cup
No.2. Australian open
No.3. Australia v England test series
No.4. AFL Grand final
No.5. ANZAC day Coll v Ess

Just missing
No.6. F1 Albert Park

(For the record - Bledisloe cup No.7, Socceroos WC Qualifiers No.8 and Moto GO No.9, then NRL GF and SOO at 10, 11, 12 and 13 respectively)

so as if this **** effort isn't enough
he then extends the list past 5
( like hes reading it off another source )... stating who just missies out ... &.. ... for the record .... ... for the record >
who makes up the rest of the top 10
right out to 13

13

ahhhhh...who made it in at 14 & 15 Swines ?
ummmmmm..... how big was the list .... 20?..... 50?
why didn't you post it all ?
>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
He is definitely trying to pass this off as an official list & just hoped forum members wouldn't be too cynical & challenge its authenticity

I mean
he had ample opportunity to state its just his list & nothing else
but no ....

he is a lying twat
a fraudulent *****
& only he'd be stupid enough to try this shit on & expect he could get away with it :_<> :_<> :_<>

this is a gold medal winning effort as the stupidest most ******** & worst thread for 2013
I mean
jesus mary & joseph folks

& Swines also has the sliver & bronze sown up too


now
lets stand by for hollow threats of retribution & acts of manly toughness in the confines of the boxing ring by our resident keyboard warrior
who's boxing abilities are no doubt as legit as this thread of his & its contents :_<> :_<> :_<>

Wagga Wagga Police boys club gym can be booked - so don't talk act! Your a big brave RL fan after all and I'm a puny weedy AFL fan - don't talk a good game prove to us your not a coward - set a date!

As for the top five all you RL fans claimed it was legit I offered it as an opinion - based on relevance nationally across Australia - it is unaltered!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

MarkZZZ wrote:

I'm just wondering what Swines is trying to prove? Is he trying to say that he is a tough guy? Is he trying to say that because he is a tough guy he must be right? Are we to assume from his bravado that he is a hulking 25 year old, 6' 4" heavyweight boxer that can clean up anyone that doesn't agree with them? Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

Swines attitude reminds me of a quote.

“Jane! will you hear reason?' (he stooped and approached his lips to my ear) 'because, if you won't, I'll try violence.”
― Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

No RD continually asserts that AF fans are gutless and RL fans could do them without raising a sweat - well I have called him a coward and very brave over a computer for some time now - I have given him plenty of opportunities to prove he's right and that he is not just a gutless wanker! Look at him run!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

So tell me what your opinion is of this?

http://www.tv.com/shows/bully-beatdown/watch/

I really don't see the need to visit and read blogs about tv shows about bullying. You on the other hand..........

Swans4ever wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I'm just wondering what Swines is trying to prove? Is he trying to say that he is a tough guy? Is he trying to say that because he is a tough guy he must be right? Are we to assume from his bravado that he is a hulking 25 year old, 6' 4" heavyweight boxer that can clean up anyone that doesn't agree with them? Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

Swines attitude reminds me of a quote.

“Jane! will you hear reason?' (he stooped and approached his lips to my ear) 'because, if you won't, I'll try violence.”
― Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

No RD continually asserts that AF fans are gutless and RL fans could do them without raising a sweat - well I have called him a coward and very brave over a computer for some time now - I have given him plenty of opportunities to prove he's right and that he is not just a gutless wanker! Look at him run!

So you don't get it do you Swines

You still think that violence is the way to go.

Tell me do you really expect
1. Anyone to be scared of what you say??????
2. Anyone is actually going to take you up on your stupid invitation.
3.It would change anything if they did?????

This is a forum where people say stuff. Your way of silencing things you don't want to hear is to invite them into a ring with the supposed intention of knocking their block off. What if they are a better fighter than you and actually take you up on your offer and knock your block off. Does that make them right and you will refrain for further banter?

How smart or dumb are you? > > >

MarkZZZ wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I'm just wondering what Swines is trying to prove? Is he trying to say that he is a tough guy? Is he trying to say that because he is a tough guy he must be right? Are we to assume from his bravado that he is a hulking 25 year old, 6' 4" heavyweight boxer that can clean up anyone that doesn't agree with them? Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

Swines attitude reminds me of a quote.

“Jane! will you hear reason?' (he stooped and approached his lips to my ear) 'because, if you won't, I'll try violence.”
― Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

No RD continually asserts that AF fans are gutless and RL fans could do them without raising a sweat - well I have called him a coward and very brave over a computer for some time now - I have given him plenty of opportunities to prove he's right and that he is not just a gutless wanker! Look at him run!

So you don't get it do you Swines

You still think that violence is the way to go.

Tell me do you really expect
1. Anyone to be scared of what you say??????
2. Anyone is actually going to take you up on your stupid invitation.
3.It would change anything if they did?????

This is a forum where people say stuff. Your way of silencing things you don't want to hear is to invite them into a ring with the supposed intention of knocking their block off. What if they are a better fighter than you and actually take you up on your offer and knock your block off. Does that make them right and you will refrain for further banter?

How smart or dumb are you? > > >

I would have a guess ,& say dumb.

MarkZZZ wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I'm just wondering what Swines is trying to prove? Is he trying to say that he is a tough guy? Is he trying to say that because he is a tough guy he must be right? Are we to assume from his bravado that he is a hulking 25 year old, 6' 4" heavyweight boxer that can clean up anyone that doesn't agree with them? Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

Swines attitude reminds me of a quote.

“Jane! will you hear reason?' (he stooped and approached his lips to my ear) 'because, if you won't, I'll try violence.”
― Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre

No RD continually asserts that AF fans are gutless and RL fans could do them without raising a sweat - well I have called him a coward and very brave over a computer for some time now - I have given him plenty of opportunities to prove he's right and that he is not just a gutless wanker! Look at him run!

So you don't get it do you Swines

You still think that violence is the way to go.

Tell me do you really expect
1. Anyone to be scared of what you say??????
2. Anyone is actually going to take you up on your stupid invitation.
3.It would change anything if they did?????

This is a forum where people say stuff. Your way of silencing things you don't want to hear is to invite them into a ring with the supposed intention of knocking their block off. What if they are a better fighter than you and actually take you up on your offer and knock your block off. Does that make them right and you will refrain for further banter?

How smart or dumb are you? > > >

Look Markzzz I don't really condone violence - boxing however is a regulated sport with rules, gloves etc etc - he often makes statements of how weedy and gutless AF fans are - he is regularly abusive and threatening all from the comfort of his basement safe in the knowledge that he can't be touched - RL regularly support his boasts and make disgraceful comments about people, I might add that KE and RD BOTH advocated summary discipline outside a boxing ring to redeem ones pride when slighted and that using violence is acceptable in sport particularly when Paul Gallen hit Nat Miles in SOO - so yes for those reasons I am giving him the chance to put his money where his mouth is in a controlled environment! Now being someone new to FC you are unaware of these facts and I will not criticise you but these are facts! ( he regularly tells people to unleash upper cuts on their chin). Now it's my way of showing one and all he is a gutless cowardly liar with the backbone of a jellyfish - he has one way to prove me wrong!

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

I never saw violence as a way of determining who was right or wrong only who was the better fighter. Don't get me wrong, I like boxing it's a great way to determine who is the better fighter.

So tell me what your opinion is of this?

http://www.tv.com/shows/bully-beatdown/watch/

I really don't see the need to visit and read blogs about tv shows about bullying. You on the other hand..........

So you think bullies are cool?