www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
I'm genuinely fearful for RL's future if the Intergalactic Vfl start to take things seriously, it's the game for the future with its softness and everyone is a winner attitude, Soccer should be very worried tooAFLcrap1 wrote:Yeh well you just wait till the ratings come out for the IC.ParraEelsNRL wrote:http://www.rlwc2013.com/rugby-league-wo ... wers-watch
Another 2+ million watching England v Fiji. Pretty good seeing as it was always going to be a big England win against a minnow nation (in every aspect).
well they will when someone has enough interest to show it .If they need a filler at 3.30AM.
& as soon as anyone in the southern backward states shows enough interest in the IC to actually attend it ,then the tv execs will take notice im sure..
Im tellin ya parra ..its a snowball effect...its just that right now its 300 degrees Celsius at IC central.
You're a goose! 2 million is shit and you know it! If it was the top rater in that time slot there must have been nothing against it worth watching! Most of England must had the TV off!! Bad news goes right over your head doesn't it?ParraEelsNRL wrote:2 million against a team everyone knew they were going to flog is great, won its timeslot where sports are concerned, said so with ratings in the article. It mentioned Union, Soccer, Tennis and something else and RL outrated them all.
Yet that's bad according to the fumbling bumbling fools here :_<>
nrlcrap, the population of England is actually 120 odd million, which makes it more funnierNRLCrap1 wrote:Doesn't matter. 2 million is pathetic in the country where the game was invented, with a population of over 50 million. With SOO drawing 4 million in Australia, a country of 22 million, this should have drawn 5 million at least. But it didn't get half that!
adamj1300 wrote:nrlcrap, the population of England is actually 120 odd million, which makes it more funnierNRLCrap1 wrote:Doesn't matter. 2 million is pathetic in the country where the game was invented, with a population of over 50 million. With SOO drawing 4 million in Australia, a country of 22 million, this should have drawn 5 million at least. But it didn't get half that!
the English do turn out in numbers to sporting events & it is a place where Union is big, so it does give the basement dwelling virgins a false sense of security.
but all we have to do it wait for the next season of the NRL as numbers fall even more
That 120 million could in fact be UK population, Adam. Not England. That figure includes Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The over 50 million I quoted doesn't.adamj1300 wrote:nrlcrap, the population of England is actually 120 odd million, which makes it more funnierNRLCrap1 wrote:Doesn't matter. 2 million is pathetic in the country where the game was invented, with a population of over 50 million. With SOO drawing 4 million in Australia, a country of 22 million, this should have drawn 5 million at least. But it didn't get half that!
the English do turn out in numbers to sporting events & it is a place where Union is big, so it does give the basement dwelling virgins a false sense of security.
but all we have to do it wait for the next season of the NRL as numbers fall even more
the blatant stupidity of AFL supporters is on display yet again.NRLCrap1 wrote:How about you provide evidence then instead of running your mouth/fingers? Or are you as bad as Dave on that?
pHyR3 wrote:the blatant stupidity of AFL supporters is on display yet again.NRLCrap1 wrote:How about you provide evidence then instead of running your mouth/fingers? Or are you as bad as Dave on that?
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/inde ... Population
aprox 60million.
i assume you havent passed geography yet, but as a 10 year old i assume thats not too big an issue.
:_<> :_<> :_<> I wasn't asking you, goose! Anyway it wasn't me who said it.pHyR3 wrote:the blatant stupidity of AFL supporters is on display yet again.NRLCrap1 wrote:How about you provide evidence then instead of running your mouth/fingers? Or are you as bad as Dave on that?
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/inde ... Population
aprox 60million.
i assume you havent passed geography yet, but as a 10 year old i assume thats not too big an issue.
NRLCrap1 wrote:I wasn't asking you, goose! Anyway it wasn't me who said it.pHyR3 wrote:the blatant stupidity of AFL supporters is on display yet again.NRLCrap1 wrote:How about you provide evidence then instead of running your mouth/fingers? Or are you as bad as Dave on that?
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/inde ... Population
aprox 60million.
i assume you havent passed geography yet, but as a 10 year old i assume thats not too big an issue.
And population has nothing to do with geography.
If you call me a 10 year old one more time I will take this size 9 (adult) boot of mine and use it on your head. Maybe then you might see some sense.
Before you start spouting shit I have always been conservative and put their pop at 50 mil - 2 million is 1/30th of their population there is still a VERY valid point - SOO got 4 mil in a little over a 3rd of their population - that would be very in signifigant in comparison to Soccer!pHyR3 wrote:the blatant stupidity of AFL supporters is on display yet again.NRLCrap1 wrote:How about you provide evidence then instead of running your mouth/fingers? Or are you as bad as Dave on that?
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/inde ... Population
aprox 60million.
i assume you havent passed geography yet, but as a 10 year old i assume thats not too big an issue.