Page 1 of 2

Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 8:46 pm
by Stewie
THE Cronulla Sharks could be forced to relocate 1450km to central or southern Queensland in 2015 in the wake of the club’s administrative failures when the ASADA investigation is complete.

The Daily Telegraph has learned NRL powerbrokers have held talks about the possibility of the Sharks being moved to Rockhampton or southern Queensland, with the club's financial position expected to become stretched to the extreme if the NRL hits Cronulla with a million-dollar fine for bringing the game into disrepute over the ongoing supplements crisis.

Under NRL rules, the game’s governing body has the power to rescind any club’s licence if they deem it has become financially insolvent or in "extreme circumstances", such as the black eye the Sharks have caused rugby league due to the club’s controversial supplements program from 2011.

With the ASADA report into the clubs practices due to be handed down after the October 6 grand final, Cronulla are still awaiting what punishments the club will face for implementing a systematic regime of banned peptides for an 11-week window under the guidance of sports scientist Stephen Dank.

The final rulings on the supplements scandal are expected to drag on well into next season, meaning the most likely time-frame on a Sharks relocation would be at the end of 2014.

NRL CEO Dave Smith denied plans to move any team in the immediate future but conceded "the footprint of the entire competition" would be "reviewed" for the following year.

"We don't have plans to move any team," Smith said.

"We are working to assist some clubs in building sustainable ways forward and that is a joint exercise that relies on the clubs being financially viable and continuing to meet corporate governance responsibilities.

"There’s no doubt that as we get to the planned review of expansion at the end of 2014 that the whole competition footprint will be looked at but that is still a while away."

With nine NRL clubs in existence in Sydney and only three in Queensland, NRL powerbrokers believe the possible relocation of the Sharks is a commercial reality rugby league can no longer ignore.

Cronulla fans will understandably be fuming about details of the potential move being leaked, but The Daily Telegraph has confirmed Smith and some of the other NRL commissioners have canvassed the issue.

Significantly, the new NRL commissioner set to replace Gary Pemberton, Graeme Samuel, was one of the pioneers on the AFL commission who campaigned to reduce the number of AFL clubs in Victoria.

During Samuel’s tenure on the AFL commission, he oversaw the relocation of the Fitzroy Lions to Brisbane and came under heavy fire for putting relocation and merger discussions on the radar for clubs including Footscray, Melbourne and Hawthorn.

The Sharks earned the ire of NRL headquarters two months ago when the club’s new board made the decision to reinstate sacked trainer Mark Noakes prior to the ASADA investigation being finalised.

As a result, interim CEO Bruno Cullen immediately quit his post in protest over the way the club had thumbed their noses at the game's governing body.

The Daily Telegraph has also been told the NRL is preparing to hit coach Shane Flanagan and his support staff during the period in question with severe sanctions, irrespective of whether they claim they knew nothing about what was going on during Dank’s tenure in the Shire.

Crucial to the high-powered NRL discussions is the management failures at Cronulla, where the Sharks hand-to-mouth existence meant it was forced to operate for three years without a chief executive.

In the AFL, the Essendon Bombers were hit with a fine of $2 million and stripped the club of its first two draft picks next season.

If the NRL was to issue Cronulla with the equivalent fine of $2 million, it could effectively send the club into financial oblivion.
Things keep going from bad to worse for the nRL & Cronulla.

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:35 pm
by King-Eliagh
This article is so full of "ifs". Bit like stewies arguments actually. :lol:

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:55 pm
by adamj1300
King-Eliagh wrote:
This article is so full of "ifs". Bit like stewies arguments actually. :lol:
well at least it offers some substance, unlike yours eliagh :)))

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:59 pm
by cos789
Undoubtedly there will be repercussions.
Simply a matter of time and the greater the delay the worse the outcome.

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:39 pm
by NRLCrap1
Cronulla is doomed!

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:42 am
by cos789
I don't see how they can be "forced to relocate" - either they survive or they die.

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:31 am
by adamj1300
Stewie wrote:
THE Cronulla Sharks could be forced to relocate 1450km to central or southern Queensland in 2015 in the wake of the club’s administrative failures when the ASADA investigation is complete.

The Daily Telegraph has learned NRL powerbrokers have held talks about the possibility of the Sharks being moved to Rockhampton or southern Queensland, with the club's financial position expected to become stretched to the extreme if the NRL hits Cronulla with a million-dollar fine for bringing the game into disrepute over the ongoing supplements crisis.

Under NRL rules, the game’s governing body has the power to rescind any club’s licence if they deem it has become financially insolvent or in "extreme circumstances", such as the black eye the Sharks have caused rugby league due to the club’s controversial supplements program from 2011.

With the ASADA report into the clubs practices due to be handed down after the October 6 grand final, Cronulla are still awaiting what punishments the club will face for implementing a systematic regime of banned peptides for an 11-week window under the guidance of sports scientist Stephen Dank.

The final rulings on the supplements scandal are expected to drag on well into next season, meaning the most likely time-frame on a Sharks relocation would be at the end of 2014.

NRL CEO Dave Smith denied plans to move any team in the immediate future but conceded "the footprint of the entire competition" would be "reviewed" for the following year.

"We don't have plans to move any team," Smith said.

"We are working to assist some clubs in building sustainable ways forward and that is a joint exercise that relies on the clubs being financially viable and continuing to meet corporate governance responsibilities.

"There’s no doubt that as we get to the planned review of expansion at the end of 2014 that the whole competition footprint will be looked at but that is still a while away."

With nine NRL clubs in existence in Sydney and only three in Queensland, NRL powerbrokers believe the possible relocation of the Sharks is a commercial reality rugby league can no longer ignore.

Cronulla fans will understandably be fuming about details of the potential move being leaked, but The Daily Telegraph has confirmed Smith and some of the other NRL commissioners have canvassed the issue.

Significantly, the new NRL commissioner set to replace Gary Pemberton, Graeme Samuel, was one of the pioneers on the AFL commission who campaigned to reduce the number of AFL clubs in Victoria.

During Samuel’s tenure on the AFL commission, he oversaw the relocation of the Fitzroy Lions to Brisbane and came under heavy fire for putting relocation and merger discussions on the radar for clubs including Footscray, Melbourne and Hawthorn.

The Sharks earned the ire of NRL headquarters two months ago when the club’s new board made the decision to reinstate sacked trainer Mark Noakes prior to the ASADA investigation being finalised.

As a result, interim CEO Bruno Cullen immediately quit his post in protest over the way the club had thumbed their noses at the game's governing body.

The Daily Telegraph has also been told the NRL is preparing to hit coach Shane Flanagan and his support staff during the period in question with severe sanctions, irrespective of whether they claim they knew nothing about what was going on during Dank’s tenure in the Shire.

Crucial to the high-powered NRL discussions is the management failures at Cronulla, where the Sharks hand-to-mouth existence meant it was forced to operate for three years without a chief executive.

In the AFL, the Essendon Bombers were hit with a fine of $2 million and stripped the club of its first two draft picks next season.

If the NRL was to issue Cronulla with the equivalent fine of $2 million, it could effectively send the club into financial oblivion.
Things keep going from bad to worse for the nRL & Cronulla.
they'd be mad to move to Rock Hampton, its next to Bundaberg to being the Worst of the Larger sized towns in QLD, its an utter dump, even with Beef, & small percentage of coal mining industry, its a relatively poor town, with a lot of unemployment. but then again that would appeal to the League market :lol:

there has been talk of Brisbane deserving a second NRL team for a while now, The Broncos are buy far the Largest club in the NRL & one of the only 2 clubs that is actually profitable & sustainable in its own thanks to its mini sized pokie filled casino & attracting the largest sized crowd in the competition.
:?>

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:11 pm
by NRLCrap1
Mackay?

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:33 pm
by King-Eliagh
Hi guys, just bolded and enlarged the real points of conviction within this amazing telegraph article for ya's all. No, dont thank me, I'm happy to provide this education...free of charge ;)
THE Cronulla Sharks could be forced to relocate 1450km to central or southern Queensland in 2015 in the wake of the club’s administrative failures when the ASADA investigation is complete.

The Daily Telegraph has learned NRL powerbrokers have held talks about the possibility of the Sharks being moved to Rockhampton or southern Queensland, with the club's financial position expected to become stretched to the extreme if the NRL hits Cronulla with a million-dollar fine for bringing the game into disrepute over the ongoing supplements crisis.

Under NRL rules, the game’s governing body has the power to rescind any club’s licence if they deem it has become financially insolvent or in "extreme circumstances", such as the black eye the Sharks have caused rugby league due to the club’s controversial supplements program from 2011.

With the ASADA report into the clubs practices due to be handed down after the October 6 grand final, Cronulla are still awaiting what punishments the club will face for implementing a systematic regime of banned peptides for an 11-week window under the guidance of sports scientist Stephen Dank.

The final rulings on the supplements scandal are expected to drag on well into next season, meaning the most likely time-frame on a Sharks relocation would be at the end of 2014.

NRL CEO Dave Smith denied plans to move any team in the immediate future but conceded "the footprint of the entire competition" would be "reviewed" for the following year.

"We don't have plans to move any team," Smith said.

"We are working to assist some clubs in building sustainable ways forward and that is a joint exercise that relies on the clubs being financially viable and continuing to meet corporate governance responsibilities.

"There’s no doubt that as we get to the planned review of expansion at the end of 2014 that the whole competition footprint will be looked at but that is still a while away."

With nine NRL clubs in existence in Sydney and only three in Queensland, NRL powerbrokers believe the possible relocation of the Sharks is a commercial reality rugby league can no longer ignore.

Cronulla fans will understandably be fuming about details of the potential move being leaked, but The Daily Telegraph has confirmed Smith and some of the other NRL commissioners have canvassed the issue :shock: :shock: .

Significantly, the new NRL commissioner set to replace Gary Pemberton, Graeme Samuel, was one of the pioneers on the AFL commission who campaigned to reduce the number of AFL clubs in Victoria.

During Samuel’s tenure on the AFL commission, he oversaw the relocation of the Fitzroy Lions to Brisbane and came under heavy fire for putting relocation and merger discussions on the radar for clubs including Footscray, Melbourne and Hawthorn.

The Sharks earned the ire of NRL headquarters two months ago when the club’s new board made the decision to reinstate sacked trainer Mark Noakes prior to the ASADA investigation being finalised.

As a result, interim CEO Bruno Cullen immediately quit his post in protest over the way the club had thumbed their noses at the game's governing body.

The Daily Telegraph has also been told the NRL is preparing to hit coach Shane Flanagan and his support staff during the period in question with severe sanctions, irrespective of whether they claim they knew nothing about what was going on during Dank’s tenure in the Shire.

Crucial to the high-powered NRL discussions is the management failures at Cronulla, where the Sharks hand-to-mouth existence meant it was forced to operate for three years without a chief executive.

In the AFL, the Essendon Bombers were hit with a fine of $2 million and stripped the club of its first two draft picks next season.

If the NRL was to issue Cronulla with the equivalent fine of $2 million, it could effectively send the club into financial oblivion.
Wow :shock: Headline news this is :lol:

Stewie, thanks for being consistent with the title: Sharks could be :(/

Again, dont thank me for pointing out the fact this news is nothing more than filler for an already ordinary newspaper. I'm happy to educate you guys, makes me feel warm inside. :D

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:52 pm
by Raiderdave
:(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol:

scanning scanning ....

well you fumbling halfwits know the rest :wink:

the NRL has no power to force anyone to relocate
&
It doesn't want to anyway

a wank
from the first word to the last


a bit like spewies posts :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:16 pm
by King-Eliagh
Stewies posts :lol:

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:21 pm
by adamj1300
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Mackay?
their population is on around 75k , but full of cashed up coal minor bogans

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:49 pm
by NRLCrap1
King-Eliagh wrote:
Wow :shock: Headline news this is :lol:

Stewie, thanks for being consistent with the title: Sharks could be :(/

Again, dont thank me for pointing out the fact this news is nothing more than filler for an already ordinary newspaper. I'm happy to educate you guys, makes me feel warm inside. :D
Cronulla's problems are public knowledge, or are you denying that? The problems can indeed cause this scenario. To say otherwise would be ignorant.

But then that's you all over, Eliagh!

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:16 pm
by King-Eliagh
Should could potentially if might possibly annnnd so on annnnd so forth.

A hopeless thread posted with the hopefull of hopefullest intent by a lost news media puppet. In other words? A waste of time and space.

But at least you folks are gettin a belting of an education in the process. :lol:

Btw crap1 ahhhh I was thinkin... Yaaaawaaaaannaaaa bet cronullA ain't relocated to qld in 2015? 8-[ [-o< 8-[ ill go ya three hundred?

:(/

Re: Sharks could be forced to relocate to QLD

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:40 pm
by NRLCrap1
No, welcher, I'll never make a bet with you. And you haven't educated anyone, except in how to welch. And be a court jester.