Talking Footy

=D> =D> =D> =D>

wow
just wow

1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Raiderdave wrote:

=D> =D> =D> =D>

wow
just wow

1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

=D> =D> =D> =D>

wow
just wow

1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.

4 f wit ...
funny

that argument seemed fine for you cockheads when you lot proclaimed the highest total ever for 4 rounds
that figure being achieved only as a result of 4 extra games ??

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

the hypocrisy
the rampant hypocrisy

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

=D> =D> =D> =D>

wow
just wow

1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.

4 f wit ...
funny

that argument seemed fine for you cockheads when you lot proclaimed the highest total ever for 4 rounds
that figure being achieved only as a result of 4 extra games ??

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

the hypocrisy
the rampant hypocrisy

I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure I said we were 2500 people a week in front of last years weekly average (2012) But I was also posting RD style (ie wow just wow ) so it was a surprise to me when you took it seriously, i certainly wasn't being real serious. I guess you are immune to satire (do you have aspbergers). The real figures are that the AFL will be up at the end of the year some where between 1500-2500 a week on average ( up from 31500 to between 33,000 and 34,000) while the NRL will be about the same as last year eg around the 16500. Love your spin though. Pretending that your results have improved from last year.

The AFL average will shoot up even higher once the Giants start winning & get sellouts every week!!

What do u reckon Raiderdave??

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

=D> =D> =D> =D>

wow
just wow

1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.

4 f wit ...
funny

that argument seemed fine for you cockheads when you lot proclaimed the highest total ever for 4 rounds
that figure being achieved only as a result of 4 extra games ??

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

the hypocrisy
the rampant hypocrisy

I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure I said we were 2500 people a week in front of last years weekly average (2012) But I was also posting RD style (ie wow just wow ) so it was a surprise to me when you took it seriously, i certainly wasn't being real serious. I guess you are immune to satire (do you have aspbergers). The real figures are that the AFL will be up at the end of the year some where between 1500-2500 a week on average ( up from 31500 to between 33,000 and 34,000) while the NRL will be about the same as last year eg around the 16500. Love your spin though. Pretending that your results have improved from last year.

I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickhead

the facts are these
the present VFL average of 34,073 is still approx
3000 down on the average in 2010 & 7000 down on average a game on the first round of this year
take one game away & times it by 9
& the VFL is well behind its attendances of 3 years ago

slide slide slide
that's the VFL's motto these days

New teams bring down the average fuckstick. Everyone knew the average would slide in 2011 and 2012, and that it would rise again in 2013.

piesman2011 wrote:

I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure

I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickhead [/quote]

Ah yes you did

Raiderdave wrote:

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts.

piesman2011 wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure

I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickhead

Ah yes you did

Raiderdave wrote:

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts. [/quote]

the only one caught out.. is you cockhead
have you answered the question

no

why


cos you know the answer

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure

I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickhead

Ah yes you did

Raiderdave wrote:

tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?

Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts.

the only one caught out.. is you cockhead
have you answered the question

no

why


cos you know the answer [/quote]

Wait I'm confused. You just said you didn't say that the AFL was 2500 ahead of 2010, but I got you in quotes saying exactly that. No wait a minute I'm not confused..... Your just full of shit