Page 1 of 2

Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:24 am
by Raiderdave
then Sydneysiders prefer the Swines ......

:-k

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

SWines on TV in Sydney .... up against the test , but in a big game for the premiers against another top 4 contender in Geebunga
36K veiwers

the Kangaroos in Melbourne ... up against the game above
40K veiwers


:?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

when will the evidence of what I'm saying .... stop proving me right about Sydneysiders & their attitude toward the Swines
when guys
when ? :cool:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:40 am
by Fred
I wonder what they would be if you added in fox ratings ?

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:44 am
by Drac
Hmm....it's almost as if Raiderdave is deliberately leaving out an important piece of information to suit his cause. But surely he wouldn't stoop to such a pathetic and transparent tactic? And yet there appears to be a glaring omission in his post. I wonder; I wonder if there's another way people in Sydney could watch the Swans game, perhaps ad-free?

Yes, could it possibly be that the state with the highest STV take-up rate in the country had more than 4k viewers watching the game last night on Fox Footy?

You unbelievably dense ****** :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:52 am
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
I wonder what they would be if you added in fox ratings ?

on the 33% availabilty scale that Sydneysiders have for PTV
another 12K or so

thats an extraordinarily poor result for the VFL premiers in Sydney
just
amazingly bad ..... & theres no other way of looking at it :cool:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:54 am
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:
Hmm....it's almost as if Raiderdave is deliberately leaving out an important piece of information to suit his cause. But surely he wouldn't stoop to such a pathetic and transparent tactic? And yet there appears to be a glaring omission in his post. I wonder; I wonder if there's another way people in Sydney could watch the Swans game, perhaps ad-free?

Yes, could it possibly be that the state with the highest STV take-up rate in the country had more than 4k viewers watching the game last night on Fox Footy?

You unbelievably dense ****** :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oh look out folks

the but but but machine is in full swing here .... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:00 am
by Fred
So you saying only 36 000 watched it on pay ?

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:03 am
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
So you saying only 36 000 watched it on pay ?

no

36K on FTA ... 100% of people have access to this in Sydney
12K on PTV .... 33% have access to this in Sydney

stunningly bad :-k

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:04 am
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
I wonder what they would be if you added in fox ratings ?

on the 33% availabilty scale that Sydneysiders have for PTV
another 12K or so

thats an extraordinarily poor result for the VFL premiers in Sydney
just
amazingly bad ..... & theres no other way of looking at it :cool:
Image

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:13 am
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
I wonder what they would be if you added in fox ratings ?

on the 33% availabilty scale that Sydneysiders have for PTV
another 12K or so

thats an extraordinarily poor result for the VFL premiers in Sydney
just
amazingly bad ..... & theres no other way of looking at it :cool:
I deal with statistics professionally, so I can appreciate the fact that this is actually the dumbest thing you've ever written on this forum.

Leaving aside your insane ******-maths, and taking your bullshit figure that makes no sense, you still have the Swans out ahead of your entire sport.

Swans in Sydney: 36k + 12k = 48k
Entire sport of Rugby League in Melbourne: 40k

So you've already disproved your own OP without realising it, so your part in this story has ended. However for the sentient beings on this thread, we'll continue on. 298k people watched the Swans game on Fox. We have no way of breaking down the numbers. Dave has used the worst maths in the history of matriculation to determine that 12k watched, but the rest of us can only guess that it would be much higher, without being so incredibly stupid as to assign an actual figure to it. All in all it was a good ratings night for the AFL.

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:26 am
by Xman
Melbourne love AFL more than Sydney love RL!

4.7m TV audience in Sydney only resulted in ratings of 413k for the RL international!

Melbournes 4.5m tuned into the home and away AFL game involving 1 Melbourne team with ratings of around 600k when FTA and Foxtel are added

:lol:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:29 am
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
I wonder what they would be if you added in fox ratings ?

on the 33% availabilty scale that Sydneysiders have for PTV
another 12K or so

thats an extraordinarily poor result for the VFL premiers in Sydney
just
amazingly bad ..... & theres no other way of looking at it :cool:
I deal with statistics professionally,

. .
you deal with your dick .. on a daily basis & thats about it :wink:
We have no way of breaking down the numbers
oh but we do
of course we do

the FTA audience in the metro areas for this same game was 682K
the Sydney audience % of this was
5% approx of the total

the PTV audience .. 298K
the Sydney audience if it were the same 5% , & why the hell wouldn't it be
would be 14.5K

yep
theres no denying it ... this is a fair & balanced way of working it out :cool:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:36 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Melbourne love AFL more than Sydney love RL!

4.7m TV audience in Sydney only resulted in ratings of 413k for the RL international!

Melbournes 4.5m tuned into the home and away AFL game involving 1 Melbourne team with ratings of around 600k when FTA and Foxtel are added

:lol:
600K eh ?


I'll see you
& raise you Brisbane

346K ... out of 2 Million
times that by 2.25 & we have .... 780K

with 13 of the 17 Aussie players being Qlders , its not surprising that Brissie got what it did , or ... Sydney got what it did
end of :cool:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:41 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Melbourne love AFL more than Sydney love RL!

4.7m TV audience in Sydney only resulted in ratings of 413k for the RL international!

Melbournes 4.5m tuned into the home and away AFL game involving 1 Melbourne team with ratings of around 600k when FTA and Foxtel are added

:lol:
600K eh ?


I'll see you
& raise you Brisbane

346K ... out of 2 Million
times that by 2.25 & we have .... 780K

with 13 of the 17 Aussie players being Qlders , its not surprising that Brissie got what it did , or ... Sydney got what it did
end of :cool:
4.6m in Melbourne rated 600k for an AFL game at 13%

4.7m in Sydney rated a poultry 413k for international RLs 1 v 2, at a horrible 8.8%

3m in GC and Brisbane rated 11.5%
http://www.oztam.com.au/documents/Other ... 171212.pdf

International RL less interesting than home and away AFL! :lol:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:01 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Melbourne love AFL more than Sydney love RL!

4.7m TV audience in Sydney only resulted in ratings of 413k for the RL international!

Melbournes 4.5m tuned into the home and away AFL game involving 1 Melbourne team with ratings of around 600k when FTA and Foxtel are added

:lol:
600K eh ?


I'll see you
& raise you Brisbane

346K ... out of 2 Million
times that by 2.25 & we have .... 780K

with 13 of the 17 Aussie players being Qlders , its not surprising that Brissie got what it did , or ... Sydney got what it did
end of :cool:
4.6m in Melbourne rated 600k for an AFL game at 13%

4.7m in Sydney rated a poultry 413k for international RLs 1 v 2, at a horrible 8.8%

3m in GC and Brisbane rated 11.5%
http://www.oztam.com.au/documents/Other ... 171212.pdf

International RL less interesting than home and away AFL! :lol:
less interesting ?

RL's ANZAC test ... Metro Audience 820K .. Regional 550K
total
1.370 Mill

Vicky Kicky last night
682K FTA metro
298 PTV
200 REgional

1.180 Mill

& apparently Australians don't care much for the Kangaroos or their exploits

gee :-k

what do they think of vicky kicky then ? 8-[
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Melbournians prefer the Kangaroos more

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:02 pm
by Xman
Wow, Dave maths at work! :lol:

Not even close idiot