Talking Footy

for the VFL premiers .... the swines



when you take stadium members & freebies out of last week, & SCG trust members out of yesterdays crowd, they were both about 17K

wow
these are numbers even I wouldn't have considered
they are atrocious
they are shocking

the Victorian game
they're playing the last post for it in Sydney

Raiderdave wrote:

for the VFL premiers .... the swines



when you take stadium members & freebies out of last week, & SCG trust members out of yesterdays crowd, they were both about 17K

wow
these are numbers even I wouldn't have considered
they are atrocious
they are shocking

the Victorian game
they're playing the last post for it in Sydney

20k in the rain against second bottom. This is again the best crowd in Sydney for the weekend! =D> =D> =D> =D>

What's more the swans got only 13k against the lowly bulldogs in the rain last year! Growth! =D>

Poor Dave! Resorting to his fudging tactic again

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

for the VFL premiers .... the swines



when you take stadium members & freebies out of last week, & SCG trust members out of yesterdays crowd, they were both about 17K

wow
these are numbers even I wouldn't have considered
they are atrocious
they are shocking

the Victorian game
they're playing the last post for it in Sydney

20k in the rain against second bottom. This is again the best crowd in Sydney for the weekend! =D> =D> =D> =D>

What's more the swans got only 13k against the lowly bulldogs in the rain last year! Growth! =D>

Poor Dave! Resorting to his fudging tactic again

rain
I though you lot said singletball fans are immuned to this ... rain .. thing ?

wow
the excuses are just on a factory assembly line for the vicky kicky mob ATM
rollin em out

the swines are the premiers
we were told Sydney was over the moon about this


it appears in reality however



Sydney couldn't give a fuck

In the AFL rain keeps a few thousand away usually. In the NRL it halves the crowd!

So Dave, you up for this bet? Will the AFL have the highest ever first 2 round tally by this arvo? EVER!

You bettin or what Dave?

I wonder where Dave went? I wonder why he won't take my bet? > >

:D

Xman wrote:

In the AFL rain keeps a few thousand away usually. In the NRL it halves the crowd!

So Dave, you up for this bet? Will the AFL have the highest ever first 2 round tally by this arvo? EVER!

You bettin or what Dave?

oh so on a fine sunny day this game still would have only got 22K
18K or so payers
only 12K empty seats instead of 14K

for the premiers
their first game at home ?





yes .... thats so much better

& we want the highest average for a round 2 of the VFL
not aggregate

you have 9 games now
not 8

this attempt at manipulation of numbers will not work on me dickhead

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

In the AFL rain keeps a few thousand away usually. In the NRL it halves the crowd!

So Dave, you up for this bet? Will the AFL have the highest ever first 2 round tally by this arvo? EVER!

You bettin or what Dave?

oh so on a fine sunny day this game still would have only got 22K
18K or so payers
only 12K empty seats instead of 14K

for the premiers
their first game at home ?





yes .... thats so much better

& we want the highest average for a round 2 of the VFL
not aggregate

you have 9 games now
not 8

this attempt at manipulation of numbers will not work on me dickhead

So is that a yes or no Dave?

Will the AFL get a higher total audience for their first 2 rounds than EVER before?

Really Dave, its an easy bet. If the AFL is in decline this should be and easy win for you...

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

In the AFL rain keeps a few thousand away usually. In the NRL it halves the crowd!

So Dave, you up for this bet? Will the AFL have the highest ever first 2 round tally by this arvo? EVER!

You bettin or what Dave?

oh so on a fine sunny day this game still would have only got 22K
18K or so payers
only 12K empty seats instead of 14K

for the premiers
their first game at home ?





yes .... thats so much better

& we want the highest average for a round 2 of the VFL
not aggregate

you have 9 games now
not 8

this attempt at manipulation of numbers will not work on me dickhead

So is that a yes or no Dave?

Will the AFL get a higher total audience for their first 2 rounds than EVER before?

Really Dave, its an easy bet. If the AFL is in decline this should be and easy win for you...

& my bet is

& we want the highest average for a round 2 of the VFL
not aggregate

really marcus its an easy bet .... aint it ?

& I said its in decline everywhere but the capital of spasticity ..... Melbourne

proof
lets look at the averages for games this weekend so far & predict for the rest

Melb... 51K a game
Syd......20K
Brisb.... 20K
Adelaide ....25K
perth .... 35K

wow
its just a whole lotta nothingness everywhere but in the sphincter of Australia ... aint it marcus ?

Poor Dave. Unwilling to bet the AFL will or will not have the highest ever tally of attendance after 2 rounds, in the history of the AFL/VFL.

This is despite the most ever games outside heartland!

Wow, just wow!

Come on Dave, its not a sure thing yet, make the bet. :D :D

Xman wrote:

Poor Dave. Unwilling to bet the AFL will or will not have the highest ever tally of attendance after 2 rounds, in the history of the AFL/VFL.

This is despite the most ever games outside heartland!

Wow, just wow!

Come on Dave, its not a sure thing yet, make the bet. :D :D

poor marcus
nutz the size of smarties ... not willing to bet his declining code will have its highest average for a round 2 in the H&A fixture

& instead relying on an extra game to claim some sort of distorted record.
I mean

do you think the NRL wouldn't have beaten aggregate records all ova the place with a 9th game ?
of course they would

but would they boast

no
they're not fuckwits ....

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Poor Dave. Unwilling to bet the AFL will or will not have the highest ever tally of attendance after 2 rounds, in the history of the AFL/VFL.

This is despite the most ever games outside heartland!

Wow, just wow!

Come on Dave, its not a sure thing yet, make the bet. :D :D

poor marcus
nutz the size of smarties ... not willing to bet his declining code will have its highest average for a round 2 in the H&A fixture

& instead relying on an extra game to claim some sort of distorted record.
I mean

do you think the NRL wouldn't have beaten aggregate records all ova the place with a 9th game ?
of course they would

but would they boast

no
they're not fuckwits ....

Averages arent a measure of expansion, totals are.


The AFL is growing. We've had the 3rd highest total round attendance ever in round 1. The 2nd highest was last year. This round will also be up there =D>

More fans across Australia going to AFL matches than ever before!

=D> =D>

But I gather then youve conceded the AFL will today have the highest ever opening 2 round tally in history.

Well done Dave! Bravo =D> =D> =D>

If the NRL put 2 new teams in Perth and Adelaide, and they average only 10k, this means the NrL is shrinking does it?

Right.......

More fans across the country, but somehow less fans also..

Another classic Davisms!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Poor Dave. Unwilling to bet the AFL will or will not have the highest ever tally of attendance after 2 rounds, in the history of the AFL/VFL.

This is despite the most ever games outside heartland!

Wow, just wow!

Come on Dave, its not a sure thing yet, make the bet. :D :D

poor marcus
nutz the size of smarties ... not willing to bet his declining code will have its highest average for a round 2 in the H&A fixture

& instead relying on an extra game to claim some sort of distorted record.
I mean

do you think the NRL wouldn't have beaten aggregate records all ova the place with a 9th game ?
of course they would

but would they boast

no
they're not fuckwits ....

Averages arent a measure of expansion, totals are.


>

so if you double the games you play

& the total attendance goes up 10% .... thats growth & a cause for celebration ?


utter cockheads

not an intelligent one among them ......not one

Xman wrote:

If the NRL put 2 new teams in Perth and Adelaide, and they average only 10k, this means the NrL is shrinking does it?

Right.......

More fans across the country, but somehow less fans also..

Another classic Davisms!

Read it and weep fool

Xman wrote:

If the NRL put 2 new teams in Perth and Adelaide, and they average only 10k, this means the NrL is shrinking does it?

Right.......

More fans across the country, but somehow less fans also..

Another classic Davisms!

you **** wanna be

the NRL would increase its aggregate if we had 2 more sides averaging just ... 10K
it would increase to 3.7 Million from the present 3.5 mill
for you see ..... like ALL other codes on the planet
if we increased our numb of games .... we'd increase our total aggregate attendance

but
unlike your garbage crap game
that increased its game total by 22

it dropped its total aggregate attendance .. dropped it , thats right
and..... the average as well
by a whopping 6K a game
how the HELL did that happen

I mean .. thats clever
I'll give the VFL that

decline .... theres just no other word