Page 1 of 5
One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:17 pm
by Stewie
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.
Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya! =D> =D> =D>
Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up

. The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.
Twitter link;
https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778
FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website.
http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/
Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:20 pm
by Xman
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
That's worth about 4 NRL clubs!
Poor Raiderdave

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:29 pm
by Beaussie
Stewie wrote:Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.
Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya! =D> =D> =D>
Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up

. The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.
Twitter link;
https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778
FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website.
http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/
Gold =D> =D> =D>
As most of us already know, the Swans are No.1 in NSW.
Another Raiderdave myth busted. Cheers Stewie =D> =D> =D>
Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:05 am
by piesman2011
Was there any doubt? Just have to message GWS twitter to show that they have 6000+ Sydney members currently.
Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:07 am
by Stewie
piesman2011 wrote:Was there any doubt? Just have to message GWS twitter to show that they have 6000+ Sydney members currently.
Tweeted them a few hours ago. Still waiting on a response.
Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:49 am
by King-Eliagh
NSW? What about Sydney?
Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:45 am
by Stewie
King-Eliagh wrote:
NSW? What about Sydney?
Raiderdave and all the other nRL tards were saying only 15k in NSW, but they were wrong. 22k in NSW... wow, just wow.

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:28 pm
by King-Eliagh
Stewie wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:
NSW? What about Sydney?
Raiderdave and all the other nRL tards were saying only 15k in NSW, but they were wrong. 22k in NSW... wow, just wow.

I always thought north of the riverina was what dave stated. Sure you're not misquoting him there stewie me boy?
In any case I think you're all having a comical lil group premie ejaculation here, jumping for joy and such... 22k in nsw, the most populous state in the country? 22k in the most populous state in the country when until only last year there was only ONE AFL team in the whole state? And lets not be foolish. LEt's not forget the AFL consider the ACT to be NSW!

Such is their keeness to blur the facts.
22k eh? For NSW and the ACT. How many members does Brisbane have from QLD? Whatever Brissie has I'd say 22k in the ACT and NSW, the most populous state for until last year only one side to draw, is by AFL standards, f'ing abysmal
Keep on wankin though fellas. It's quite amusing =D>

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:31 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:Stewie wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:
NSW? What about Sydney?
Raiderdave and all the other nRL tards were saying only 15k in NSW, but they were wrong. 22k in NSW... wow, just wow.

I always thought north of the riverina was what dave stated. Sure you're not misquoting him there stewie me boy?
In any case I think you're all having a comical lil group premie ejaculation here, jumping for joy and such... 22k in nsw, the most populous state in the country? 22k in the most populous state in the country when until only last year there was only ONE AFL team in the whole state? And lets not be foolish. LEt's not forget the AFL consider the ACT to be NSW!

Such is their keeness to blur the facts.
22k eh? For NSW and the ACT. How many members does Brisbane have from QLD? Whatever Brissie has I'd say 22k in the ACT and NSW, the most populous state for until last year only one side to draw, is by AFL standards, f'ing abysmal
Keep on wankin though fellas. It's quite amusing =D>

They swans will have more nsw members than any NSW NRL club this year

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:12 pm
by Stewie
King-Eliagh wrote:Stewie wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:
NSW? What about Sydney?
Raiderdave and all the other nRL tards were saying only 15k in NSW, but they were wrong. 22k in NSW... wow, just wow.

I always thought north of the riverina was what dave stated. Sure you're not misquoting him there stewie me boy?
In any case I think you're all having a comical lil group premie ejaculation here, jumping for joy and such... 22k in nsw, the most populous state in the country? 22k in the most populous state in the country when until only last year there was only ONE AFL team in the whole state? And lets not be foolish. LEt's not forget the AFL consider the ACT to be NSW!

Such is their keeness to blur the facts.
22k eh? For NSW and the ACT. How many members does Brisbane have from QLD? Whatever Brissie has I'd say 22k in the ACT and NSW, the most populous state for until last year only one side to draw, is by AFL standards, f'ing abysmal
Keep on wankin though fellas. It's quite amusing =D>

This is from the memberships thread, Raiderdave clearly says outside NSW.
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
AFL in Nsw will have about 40k members this year, and growing =D>
ah no ............ the Midgets will have about 3.5K... out of 10K
& the Swines
about 15K to 18K out of 30K
meaning vicky kicky will have about 20K members in NSW for its 2 clubs
less then a third of the combined total of just 3 NSW based NRL clubs
South Sydney 25K
the Dragons 20K
Newcastle 20K
VFL in NSW ... on deaths door
end of

Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:12 pm
by King-Eliagh
Premieboy wrote:They swans will have more nsw members than any NSW NRL club this year

In what is basically a one team state and including ACT members.

Xman you're making quite the mess with your premie ejaculations there

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:16 pm
by King-Eliagh
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut

The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:22 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:Premieboy wrote:They swans will have more nsw members than any NSW NRL club this year

In what is basically a one team state and including ACT members.

Xman you're making quite the mess with your premie ejaculations there

Swans plus giants equals how many teams dumbarse? Basically two
Together they should have about 45k members this year. Compare that to the storms 10k.....

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:23 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut

The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

6k of the swans 22k are from the ACT? Prove it

Re: One of Raiderdave's biggest lies exposed
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:52 pm
by Stewie
King-Eliagh wrote:Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut

The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

Why don't you ask the Swans how many members are ACT based? I already asked how many are from NSW, 22,000 of them.
