Page 1 of 3

cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:18 pm
by cos789
what's more to say?

Hmmmmm

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:43 pm
by Stewie
Maybe if they had a better share of Brisbane's FTA matches they could find a sponsor.

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:52 pm
by Xman
An increase in revenue from TV rights won't help these struggling NRL teams enough if they don't get decent exposure, memberships and crowds.

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:59 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
what's more to say?

Hmmmmm
what more is there to say

oh I dunno cockhead
lets try ... the Sharks are debt free ... they don't own anyone a penny
what a shame more then half the clubs in the VFL can't say the same & in fact many are going to the wall :wink:

worry about your own broke ... pennyless skint piece of cr@p clubs before you shed any concern about ours :cool:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:07 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Maybe if they had a better share of Brisbane's FTA matches they could find a sponsor.
yes .. sponsors & 22 FTA games got your lot what exactly again in 2012?
a 12 mnth .. 6.3 Million operating loss ........... :lol: :lol:

I somehow don't think the sharks CEO will be calling yours for any tips ..... K :cool:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:11 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
An increase in revenue from TV rights won't help these struggling NRL teams enough if they don't get decent exposure, memberships and crowds.
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:42 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Maybe if they had a better share of Brisbane's FTA matches they could find a sponsor.
yes .. sponsors & 22 FTA games got your lot what exactly again in 2012?
a 12 mnth .. 6.3 Million operating loss ........... :lol: :lol:

I somehow don't think the sharks CEO will be calling yours for any tips ..... K :cool:
1. We don't have 22 FTA national games.
2. It wasn't 6.3 million. It was only 2 weeks ago that in response to the Steven Trigg punishment you said "the article was written in Adelaide so it should be disregarded". You fucking double standards hypocrite.

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:59 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
An increase in revenue from TV rights won't help these struggling NRL teams enough if they don't get decent exposure, memberships and crowds.
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:26 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Maybe if they had a better share of Brisbane's FTA matches they could find a sponsor.
yes .. sponsors & 22 FTA games got your lot what exactly again in 2012?
a 12 mnth .. 6.3 Million operating loss ........... :lol: :lol:

I somehow don't think the sharks CEO will be calling yours for any tips ..... K :cool:
1. We don't have 22 FTA national games.
2. It wasn't 6.3 million. It was only 2 weeks ago that in response to the Steven Trigg punishment you said "the article was written in Adelaide so it should be disregarded". You fucking double standards hypocrite.
but but but

port brokelaide
goooonnnee eeeeeee :cool:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:37 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
An increase in revenue from TV rights won't help these struggling NRL teams enough if they don't get decent exposure, memberships and crowds.
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem
:lol: :lol: :lol:
oh ... more from Marcus's finance 1o1 manual

the CEO of pork swordelaide was last seen reading it to get some ideas ... he loaned it to the Wions CEO

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:45 am
by eelofwest
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
An increase in revenue from TV rights won't help these struggling NRL teams enough if they don't get decent exposure, memberships and crowds.
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem
Do you have a link to your bogus claims Xman? or are you telling porkies again. As far as i know not all AFL clubs have put out there financial statements for 2012 so your claim can only be another porkie.... :lol:

Out of the 11 clubs to release the financial reports 6 have made losses and this does not included GWS, SUNS...... :lol:

Total Profit/Loss:

Essendon – $12,345,536 = 400k after 12m in government grants is taken out.
Collingwood – $7,835,000*
Richmond – $3,017,742
Hawthorn – $1,288,810
Melbourne – $19,485
1 Western Bulldogs – (136,679)
2 St Kilda – ($436,818)
3 Carlton – ($639,799)
4 Geelong – ($996,000)
5 Brisbane – ($2,200,013)
6 Port Adelaide – ($2,117,071)*

http://footybusiness.wordpress.com/gove ... l-reports/

You must stop telling Lies Xman...... [-X [-X

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:24 pm
by Xman
eelofwest wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem
Do you have a link to your bogus claims Xman? or are you telling porkies again. As far as i know not all AFL clubs have put out there financial statements for 2012 so your claim can only be another porkie.... :lol:

Out of the 11 clubs to release the financial reports 6 have made losses and this does not included GWS, SUNS...... :lol:

Total Profit/Loss:

Essendon – $12,345,536 = 400k after 12m in government grants is taken out.
Collingwood – $7,835,000*
Richmond – $3,017,742
Hawthorn – $1,288,810
Melbourne – $19,485
1 Western Bulldogs – (136,679)
2 St Kilda – ($436,818)
3 Carlton – ($639,799)
4 Geelong – ($996,000)
5 Brisbane – ($2,200,013)
6 Port Adelaide – ($2,117,071)*

http://footybusiness.wordpress.com/gove ... l-reports/

You must stop telling Lies Xman...... [-X [-X
:roll: This has been proven already. Youre the one telling lies

Operating Profit
Collingwood – $4,860,000
Richmond – $3,017,742
North Melbourne – $1,193,080
Hawthorn – $1,288,810
St Kilda – $631,135
Essendon – $401,429
Geelong – $322,000
Melbourne $77,618

Wc and Dockers always make profits, as do the crows. Sydney already announced they will make a small profit.


Operating Loss
Western Bulldogs – ($136,679)
Carlton – ($683,799)
Brisbane – ($2,513,262)
Port Adelaide – ($4,120,000)

Plus Suns and Giants

http://footybusiness.wordpress.com/gove ... l-reports/

12 out of 18 AFL clubs make profits.

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:26 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol:

& again .... ask the wions , pork swordelaide & about ten other VFL clubs
what having the above did for them in 2012 knob :lol: :lol: :lol:


16 NRL clubs ... in the black ... in 2013
the VFL can't claim the same .. not even close :cool:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem
:lol: :lol: :lol:
oh ... more from Marcus's finance 1o1 manual

the CEO of pork swordelaide was last seen reading it to get some ideas ... he loaned it to the Wions CEO

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
So Australia are in dire straights because near a million people have debt aka mortgages? :-k :lol:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:01 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
6 AFL clubs made a loss out of 18, and that includes 2 brand new expansion teams. All these teams are on or near the bottom so revenue was down due to poor on filed performance. This will be addressed as they improve and they get support from the AFL.

And these NRL clubs? Struggling despite success... :lol:

The sharks are debt free? Who cares! Debt isnt the issue, lack of income to pay debt is. :roll: ask millions of Australians with a mortgage if debt alone is a problem
:lol: :lol: :lol:
oh ... more from Marcus's finance 1o1 manual

the CEO of pork swordelaide was last seen reading it to get some ideas ... he loaned it to the Wions CEO

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
So Australia are in dire straights because near a million people have debt aka mortgages? :-k :lol:

every house in Aust has a budget ( of sorts )
if outs are larger then .. ins

then the debt grows as interest compounds & eventually you lose your house & go bankrupt

another lesson in finance for you D head
no.. don't thank me :cool:

Re: cronulla sponsorless again

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:01 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
oh ... more from Marcus's finance 1o1 manual

the CEO of pork swordelaide was last seen reading it to get some ideas ... he loaned it to the Wions CEO

8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
So Australia are in dire straights because near a million people have debt aka mortgages? :-k :lol:

every house in Aust has a budget ( of sorts )
if outs are larger then .. ins

then the debt grows as interest compounds & eventually you lose your house & go bankrupt

another lesson in finance for you D head
no.. don't thank me :cool:
So as I have been saying all along, debt isnt an issue if you can service it..... :roll:

FMD youre a moron!