Talking Footy

Over 30,000 last week for Sydney FC and a sellout crowd expected at Parramatta Stadium this weekend for the A-League.

RL heartland

Beaussie wrote:

Over 30,000 last week for Sydney FC and a sellout crowd expected at Parramatta Stadium this weekend for the A-League.

RL heartland

hmmmmmm
the A league average in Melbourne is currently bigger then the VFLs
42,000
heartland

wots that you say
theres only been 1 game ?

well there will of been only 3 in Sydney after this weekend
22K the average

16K for the NRL .. but after 108 games.. in Sydney
so
how many 80K plus crowds for soccer in Sydney .... none
70K ..none

how many 1 million plus TV audiences in Sydney for soccer .... none
500K plus... none
400K plus .... none
300K plus .... none

hey theres another sport in Sydney that would have to answer the same to all of the above .. none
guess what it is ?

yes lets not pee our pants bearsy
yes they've rounded up your silly little sport ... yawnion probably too

but League ?

Will be interesting to see at the end of the season how things pan out. Last year the Victory had a good bump to crowds with Harry, but still had a lower average attendance than every Melbourne AFL club. I wonder if the same will be said of Sydney FC and Sydney-based nRL clubs at the end of 2013.

Time will tell.

Drac wrote:

Will be interesting to see at the end of the season how things pan out. Last year the Victory had a good bump to crowds with Harry, but still had a lower average attendance than every Melbourne AFL club.
Time will tell.

does it cost only $5 bucks to get into a Victory game ?
hardly a fair comparison then is it d head

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Will be interesting to see at the end of the season how things pan out. Last year the Victory had a good bump to crowds with Harry, but still had a lower average attendance than every Melbourne AFL club.
Time will tell.

does it cost only $5 bucks to get into a Victory game ?
hardly a fair comparison then is it d head

It costs $6.50 for a junior to get into tonight's Victory game against the Reds.

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Will be interesting to see at the end of the season how things pan out. Last year the Victory had a good bump to crowds with Harry, but still had a lower average attendance than every Melbourne AFL club.
Time will tell.

does it cost only $5 bucks to get into a Victory game ?
hardly a fair comparison then is it d head

It costs $6.50 for a junior to get into tonight's Victory game against the Reds.

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

6.50 for a kid to tonights soccer
so thats more then double .. nearly triple .. what a kid pays to get into the GGGGGGGGG for a flogball game

JUNIOR
$10.55
$6.05
$4.15
$2.50

no doubt that its the same for all other tickets as well

like I said
VFL cheapest sport on the planet to get into

The AFL goes out of its way to get kids to attend games, knowing full well that kids grow up and become adults, and a culture of attendance as a child is important if they want the subsequent adult to attend. Finals are another story.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6473721338

Drac wrote:

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

Don't waste your time. Dodegy dave one day will say something almost intelligent but I'll miss it because I don't bother with anything with his monika on it.

To answer your question - just look at the bizarre senseless reply inbedded in 1001 modicoms.

Typical of the rl set. They cannot see past AFL. They are consumed by AFL. They read (well look at the pictures) all the AFL posts. They are totally besotterd by AFL.
In the meantime they are oblivious to the their main threat - soccer.
Soccer dominates participation by far. Now soccer is starting to flex it's muscle at elite level.
If rl doesn't watch out it'll slip to number three behind soccer and AFL.

.

cos789 wrote:

Drac wrote:

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

Don't waste your time. Dodegy dave one day will say something almost intelligent but I'll miss it because I don't bother with anything with his monika on it.

To answer your question - just look at the bizarre senseless reply inbedded in 1001 modicoms.

Typical of the rl set. They cannot see past AFL. They are consumed by AFL. They read (well look at the pictures) all the AFL posts. They are totally besotterd by AFL.
In the meantime they are oblivious to the their main threat - soccer.
Soccer dominates participation by far. Now soccer is starting to flex it's muscle at elite level.
If rl doesn't watch out it'll slip to number three behind soccer and AFL.

.

so much drivel .. so few words

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

does it cost only $5 bucks to get into a Victory game ?
hardly a fair comparison then is it d head

It costs $6.50 for a junior to get into tonight's Victory game against the Reds.

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

6.50 for a kid to tonights soccer
so thats more then double .. nearly triple .. what a kid pays to get into the GGGGGGGGG for a flogball game

JUNIOR
$10.55
$6.05
$4.15
$2.50

no doubt that its the same for all other tickets as well

like I said
VFL cheapest sport on the planet to get into

whether tickets are 6 dollars or 2 dollars is irrelevant. Both are perfectly affordable.

As Drac said, the AFL encourage child attendance to continue their attendance culture. They can do that by subsidising the cost because they have the revenue to do it.

Another example of why the AFL are better off than the nRL, despite not making a massive profit.

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Drac wrote:

I'm curious if you know the $5 figure is just for children, or if you really do believe that Adults in Melbourne pay only $5 to attend AFL games? I know you're cognitively disabled, but i'm interested to gauge exactly HOW disabled you are. Your answer to my question will go a long way to solving that particular puzzle for me, and would be appreciated.

Don't waste your time. Dodegy dave one day will say something almost intelligent but I'll miss it because I don't bother with anything with his monika on it.

To answer your question - just look at the bizarre senseless reply inbedded in 1001 modicoms.

Typical of the rl set. They cannot see past AFL. They are consumed by AFL. They read (well look at the pictures) all the AFL posts. They are totally besotterd by AFL.
In the meantime they are oblivious to the their main threat - soccer.
Soccer dominates participation by far. Now soccer is starting to flex it's muscle at elite level.
If rl doesn't watch out it'll slip to number three behind soccer and AFL.

.

so much drivel .. so few words

Physic or is dodgey dave so patheically predictable?

.

cos789 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cos789 wrote:

Don't waste your time. Dodegy dave one day will say something almost intelligent but I'll miss it because I don't bother with anything with his monika on it.

To answer your question - just look at the bizarre senseless reply inbedded in 1001 modicoms.

Typical of the rl set. They cannot see past AFL. They are consumed by AFL. They read (well look at the pictures) all the AFL posts. They are totally besotterd by AFL.
In the meantime they are oblivious to the their main threat - soccer.
Soccer dominates participation by far. Now soccer is starting to flex it's muscle at elite level.
If rl doesn't watch out it'll slip to number three behind soccer and AFL.

.

so much drivel .. so few words

Physic or is dodgey dave so patheically predictable?

.

This is one of his classic responses for when he has been owned and has no real response. The amount of times I saw the exact quote on LU...

Drac wrote:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/a ... 6500298237

You'd have to worry about Parramatta wouldn't you?

.

Im more worried about newcastle