Talking Footy

Heads

not legs

12,790 at Metricon yesterday






please .... there were more gaps in those stands then in Parramattas defence

8000 tops


the fudging begins already for the Thuns

The titans have been shown to fudge crowd numbers and even Roy Masters said they are adding 50% to the crowds.

The suns number looked right. To me. I'm glad you're tuning in though.

Xman wrote:

The titans have been shown to fudge crowd numbers and even Roy Masters said they are adding 50% to the crowds.

.

the Thuns are doing it as well ... & they added about 50% to their crowd yesterday as well
how pathetic

the Titans actually charge a bit to get into their games

the Thuns are considerably cheaper yet still have to lie about their gates

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

The titans have been shown to fudge crowd numbers and even Roy Masters said they are adding 50% to the crowds.

.

the Thuns are doing it as well ... & they added about 50% to their crowd yesterday as well
how pathetic

the Titans actually charge a bit to get into their games

the Thuns are considerably cheaper yet still have to lie about their gates

we have proof. you have opinion. :D

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

The titans have been shown to fudge crowd numbers and even Roy Masters said they are adding 50% to the crowds.

.

the Thuns are doing it as well ... & they added about 50% to their crowd yesterday as well
how pathetic

the Titans actually charge a bit to get into their games

the Thuns are considerably cheaper yet still have to lie about their gates

we have proof. you have opinion. :D

oh we have proof too

our eyes
unlike yours
ours aren't stuck on

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

the Thuns are doing it as well ... & they added about 50% to their crowd yesterday as well
how pathetic

the Titans actually charge a bit to get into their games

the Thuns are considerably cheaper yet still have to lie about their gates

we have proof. you have opinion. :D

oh we have proof too

our eyes
unlike yours
ours aren't stuck on

Hmm, you may have eyes but grade 2 maths limits your capacity to count beyond 5. Helps with those sets though right?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

we have proof. you have opinion. :D

oh we have proof too

our eyes
unlike yours
ours aren't stuck on

Hmm, you may have eyes but grade 2 maths limits your capacity to count beyond 5. Helps with those sets though right?

grade 2 maths
have a look at your effort on the VFL betting odds
then give yrself an uppercut

thuns .... fudgey fudgey

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

oh we have proof too

our eyes
unlike yours
ours aren't stuck on

Hmm, you may have eyes but grade 2 maths limits your capacity to count beyond 5. Helps with those sets though right?

grade 2 maths
have a look at your effort on the VFL betting odds
then give yrself an uppercut

thuns .... fudgey fudgey

I know my comments. This proves your maths and comprehension skills are at grade 2 level!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Hmm, you may have eyes but grade 2 maths limits your capacity to count beyond 5. Helps with those sets though right?

grade 2 maths
have a look at your effort on the VFL betting odds
then give yrself an uppercut

thuns .... fudgey fudgey

I know my comments. This proves your maths and comprehension skills are at grade 2 level!

I know em too

oh oh oh , but but but I didn't mean it that way



Marcus the ****

I meant exactly what I said. You're too stupid to understand a simple claim. Hardly surprising though. You claimed the AFL don't have upsets despite just under half the games in the first round resulting in upsets!

Xman wrote:

I meant exactly what I said. You're too stupid to understand a simple claim. Hardly surprising though. You claimed the AFL don't have upsets despite just under half the games in the first round resulting in upsets!

but but but

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I meant exactly what I said. You're too stupid to understand a simple claim. Hardly surprising though. You claimed the AFL don't have upsets despite just under half the games in the first round resulting in upsets!

but but but

Are they your excuses for your "1 in 7" claim?