Page 1 of 5

BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:44 pm
by Xman
BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead against the Giants

Claimant: Raiderdave

Challenger: TLPG

Challenged: 25/03/12 2130

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:27 am
by TLPG
TBH, I think it's about time that Raider was forced in here. I know when NSWAFL was about he wanted him to come in here, but it was taken as "let him get all these points". I honestly think after this one that such an attitude is no longer appropriate. Raider has made a serious match fixing allegation here which is well beyond the usual Fight Club banter. For this reason I believe it's time that either Raider comes in here and defends himself - or he gets suspended.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:04 pm
by King-Eliagh
*this post is off topic and has therefore been deleted* [-X

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:16 pm
by justanotherleaguefan
I can't believe you AFL clowns still go on with this sh8t. No one seems to care about it.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:58 pm
by King-Eliagh
justanotherleaguefan wrote:
I can't believe you AFL clowns still go on with this sh8t. No one seems to care about it.
yes that's spot on, especially when you read tlpg's dribble above.

Now raider you get your arse in here otherwise its suspension for you! :lol:

I said it before and ill say it again. Beaussies never gunna suspend me or raider, cause we're good contributors, unlike tlpg who consistently ignores his self imposed ban and confuses members with his archaic rules.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:17 am
by TLPG
justanotherleaguefan wrote:
I can't believe you AFL clowns still go on with this sh8t. No one seems to care about it.
Talk to Raider, Justa. He's the one going on about what is absolute BS.

As for you, KE, the rules are clear outside of TFC. Nothing archiac about it at all so stop whining and start helping Raider with some evidence. I'm only acting on this because the allegation is far more serious than anything else in the history of the BS file.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:34 pm
by King-Eliagh
TLPG wrote:
I'm only acting on this because the allegation is far more serious than anything else in the history of the BS file.
:lol: there may never be a more apt moment to use the term - Delusions of Grandeur

Go on TLPG, why not just go ahead and startup a sticky thread titled "Get Raiderdave banned" --- delusions of grandeur :lol:

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:57 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
TLPG wrote:
I'm only acting on this because the allegation is far more serious than anything else in the history of the BS file.
:lol: there may never be a more apt moment to use the term - Delusions of Grandeur

Go on TLPG, why not just go ahead and startup a sticky thread titled "Get Raiderdave banned" --- delusions of grandeur :lol:
Shut up! You're the king of delusions of grandeur Mr "international ARs player"! :roll: As if youve ever played ARs! You havent got a clue about the game! #-o

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:44 pm
by King-Eliagh
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
TLPG wrote:
I'm only acting on this because the allegation is far more serious than anything else in the history of the BS file.
:lol: there may never be a more apt moment to use the term - Delusions of Grandeur

Go on TLPG, why not just go ahead and startup a sticky thread titled "Get Raiderdave banned" --- delusions of grandeur :lol:
You're the king ... Mr "international ARs player"!
Thanks and yes, yes I dont like to brag but i am an international marngrook/victorian rules player :) .

And you remind me also Xman, I need to update my local comp performance this season. Thanks. :)

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:16 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Xman wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
:lol: there may never be a more apt moment to use the term - Delusions of Grandeur

Go on TLPG, why not just go ahead and startup a sticky thread titled "Get Raiderdave banned" --- delusions of grandeur :lol:
You're the king ... Mr "international ARs player"!
Thanks and yes, yes I dont like to brag but i am an international marngrook/victorian rules player :) .

And you remind me also Xman, I need to update my local comp performance this season. Thanks. :)
I'll update it for you:

KE: "i am lying :^o

I am a liar :^o "

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:29 pm
by King-Eliagh
Nope, as the title suggests, the truth is a bitter pill to swallow. And perhaps its most bitter for you dear Xman. I play the sport and love it. I watch the sport and mostly love it on tv. I watch the sport live and love it. I just dont like deluded fools i.e. the AFL supporters in here. Just shocking , the majority of them. Like children they are unable to admit anything which may not be all dandy and roses about the sport they love. A massive uppercut of humility is whats needed.

Now go and read my progress playing marngrook in sydney!

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:42 pm
by TLPG
King-Eliagh wrote:
TLPG wrote:
I'm only acting on this because the allegation is far more serious than anything else in the history of the BS file.
:lol: there may never be a more apt moment to use the term - Delusions of Grandeur

Go on TLPG, why not just go ahead and startup a sticky thread titled "Get Raiderdave banned" --- delusions of grandeur :lol:
I've got a better idea. How about you help Raider out by proving that the Swans did intentionally take it easy under orders. Prove that I'm guilty of your allegation of delusions by providing evidence that raider was right. Until then, I am not guilty of being deluded.

I'm not getting involved in the off topic nonsense about your claim to have played the game.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:53 pm
by King-Eliagh
That's because you know I play the game TLPG. Beaussie told you in a pm some time ago and I'm glad he did. Your delusions of grandeur are not in regards to whether Raiderdave was right or wrong in his statement. The delusion sets in where I quote YOU. i.e Raiders comment being a "serious match fixing allegation" and "far more serious than anything else in the history of the FC."

Seriously TLPG, this is what delusions of grandeur are made of. Raiderdave is not an AFL official or player, he is simply an individual making an educated statement. He therefore cannot be accused of making a "serious match fixing allegation". Sheesh do i have to explain everything to you?

Long live Raiderdave in the Fightlcub! :\: :bounce: :compress: :bounce: :\:

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:13 pm
by TLPG
Educated statement?? Are you nuts? It was anything but! It was total BS and defamation against the Swans and the AFL to boot!! It is the worst statement on the grounds that nothing else in the previous 24 BS files could be in any way described as blatant defamation.

So again - prove that Raider tells the truth. Or shut your stupid mouth.

Re: BS file claim #25: the Swans were ordered to run dead

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:48 pm
by Xman
TLPG wrote:
Educated statement?? Are you nuts? It was anything but! It was total BS and defamation against the Swans and the AFL to boot!! It is the worst statement on the grounds that nothing else in the previous 24 BS files could be in any way described as blatant defamation.

So again - prove that Raider tells the truth. Or shut your stupid mouth.
It's as stupid as KE claiming AD said the GWS would be a smash hit from game 1. These fools are full of pathetic guesses with not a brain cell or honest statement between them. #-o