Page 1 of 6
BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,Vic
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:06 pm
by Xman
BS File claim#10: Well there you have it. Union doing better than RL in Queensland, the ACT and Victoria.
Claimant: Beaussie
Challenger: paraEelsNRL
Challenged: 2205 29/01/12
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:06 pm
by Xman
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:08 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Bea has 2 challengers for this, cooee and myself.
This is a double challenge for double BS points.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:16 pm
by cooee
The thread was about crowds so that should be somewhere in the claim.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:17 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bea has 2 challengers for this, cooee and myself.
This is a double challenge for double BS points.
2 challenges for the one claim? I don't think so. Otherwise Raiderdave would have 5 BS points by now for his BS claim#5, which was unwinnable.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:18 pm
by Xman
cooee wrote:The thread was about crowds so that should be somewhere in the claim.
The context is in the detail of the linked thread. It will be considered in the final decision.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:21 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Ok, so all I have to do is prove that the Broncos averaged better than the Reds right?
If I do that, how long do I wait until I get my best and smartest point and bea gets what he deserves? (esp after the anzac thing

)
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:24 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Ok, so all I have to do is prove that the Broncos averaged better than the Reds right?
If I do that, how long do I wait until I get my best and smartest point and bea gets what he deserves? (esp after the anzac thing

)
That would be a good start yes.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:30 pm
by Beaussie
How can BS be called on this? I was merely posting the comments of John O'Neill and what was reported.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:31 pm
by Beaussie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bea has 2 challengers for this, cooee and myself.
This is a double challenge for double BS points.
Your challenge is against John O'Neill not me I would have thought.

Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:32 pm
by Xman
Beaussie wrote:How can BS be called on this? I was merely posting the comments of John O'Neill and what was reported.
I'm afraid that you posted the proof. But if the proof turns out to be disproved its against you, because you used it. I think it's only fair.
For example if someone posts proof in a BS file and the proof is shown to be incorrect the penalty for the person who claims it still applies. They cannot claim it was the souce's mistake.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:32 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
:D
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
http://forum.planet-rugby.com/index.php ... sg_7305615
Here's a thread at planet Union where I had the same argument with the unionites a few months ago and even they conceded defeat.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:35 pm
by Beaussie
Well for a start, Union does have higher average attendances than League in the ACT and VIC. I'll get back to you all on the QLD situation. Again though, I protest that I was just reporting what Mr O'Neill said.
Re: BS File claim#10: Union doing better than RL in Qld,ACT,
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:38 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Hey, when I called BS file, I made sure I said the Broncos, I couldn't give a stuff about the other 2
