www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Then Beaussie wrote:Beaussie wrote:
I predict Pay TV and FTA TV ratings for the AFL will increase with more live games on both platforms nationwide. I personally can't wait to get Foxtel installed. Friday night footy live on 7mate in NSW/ACT and QLD is going to be fantastic for those without Foxtel as well. Good times ahead.
Raiderdave wrote:
AFL ratings have fallen 30% since 2005
another 5% in 2011
I'd attribute the 2011 drop to the unattractiveness of the comp itself ....uneven , uncompetitive with many many blow outs .. with a lot of games over by 1/4 time in a lot of instances
2012 will be worse
ratings for the AFL to continue falling making it 8 seasons ... in a row .. that they have
they may have their new deal locked in .... its just as well
hoodwinked twice now broadcasters have been by the AFL
a 3rd time ... ??
I'd say no .... the games up
& AFL rights to stagnate for the foreseeable future when this deal is done ...........
Then Raidedave:More BS. Seriously Raider, you just make things up as you go. No one's falling for it. The majority of what you post is utter BS.
In any case, we have another Australian sports record... $1.25 Billion tv/media deal banked. Good luck with your negotiations. haha
so are you claiming AFL ratings haven't fallen ?
if you are ... I'm calling BS
which means you have to prove it .............
I'm afraid that's not true. Beaussie claimed the figures RD posted were wrong but he didn't ask for proof. Beaussie was then challenged. He therefore needs to show evidence his claim is right.NSWAFL wrote:Dave's a fool. It's now up to him to prove that it has dropped by 30 percent, but he won't come in here! Beaussie doesn't have to prove a thing!
Edit - shouldn't one of these be number 7?
Yes, I messed the heading upNSWAFL wrote:Dave's a fool. It's now up to him to prove that it has dropped by 30 percent, but he won't come in here! Beaussie doesn't have to prove a thing!
Edit - shouldn't one of these be number 7?
Considering the following statement by Raiderdave, I formally request that this BS file be closed asap.Xman wrote:BS file Claim#7: AFL ratings have NOT fallen 30% since 2005 (including) another 5% in 2011
Claimant: Beaussie
Challenger: Raiderdave
Challenged: 2115 29/01/12
Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Yep, going to do just that NSWAFL.NSWAFL wrote:Call him on BS, Beaussie! He ignored the previous one and got buried for it!
you do that
I don't go in there anyway ............
the claim about NRL rating better then a lot of S15 in NZ is being finalised
but you pop off to your BS file with your AFL mates
I don't give a flying f.uck
posting.php?mode=quote&f=1&p=35140
If I close this file because Raiderdave refuses to play in here it would be unfair of any of us to challenge any of the regular BS statements he makes, which in reality are just easy points for AFL fans. If he refuses to come and show evidence it shouldn't be hard to prove the case for your claim surely.Beaussie wrote:Considering the following statement by Raiderdave, I formally request that this BS file be closed asap.Xman wrote:BS file Claim#7: AFL ratings have NOT fallen 30% since 2005 (including) another 5% in 2011
Claimant: Beaussie
Challenger: Raiderdave
Challenged: 2115 29/01/12
In his own words, he does not participate in BS files and his original claim cannot be proven by himself because again, in his words, the claim is still to be finalised. How can I be challenged on something by Raiderdave when these factors are taken into account?
Close this thread please.
Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Yep, going to do just that NSWAFL.
you do that
I don't go in there anyway ............
the claim about NRL rating better then a lot of S15 in NZ is being finalised
but you pop off to your BS file with your AFL mates
I don't give a flying f.uck
posting.php?mode=quote&f=1&p=35140
look this is a tricky one. I'll give himthee full 7 days to feature in this thread, if not it will be undecided.Beaussie wrote:Raider has already made it clear he does not visit this part. That being the case, why not lock this one up early following a precedent already set with other BS files? That's all I'm pointing out.
