Page 1 of 2

Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:39 pm
by cos789
Moving on we see the Chilean AFC .

Aussie Rules was first played in Chile in 2002, and was part of an experiment for the Alternative Sports Association based in Santiago to introduce new sports into the program in 2004. A small league was planned in Santiago and the possibility of matches against an Argentine representative team was discussed, but these projects did not materialise and the sport went on hiatus.

The country's first organised club, the Santiago Saints, were founded in late 2007 and played their first match against Argentina in 2008. Continued recruitment of locals saw a Chile vs Anzacs match held in early 2009, the Anzacs consisting of the Saints expatriate players and the Chilean team being all-local.

In June 2009, the Saints traveled to Rio de Janeiro for a match against a side of Australians resident in Brazil dubbed the 'Carnaval', the first ever match to be held on Brazilian soil.


http://www.aussierulesinternational.com ... rica/chile

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:41 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
1 team.

Bahahahahahahahaahahahahaahah

Do they play with themselves?

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:44 pm
by NSWAFL
Better than none, like RL in Chile!

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:52 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yeah true, probably better than the roostas too aye mattycmuxplutonium?

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:07 pm
by cos789
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
1 team.

Bahahahahahahahaahahahahaahah

Do they play with themselves?
Read and you will learn

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:12 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
1 team sara.

1 Team sara.

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:20 pm
by cos789
do you know the difference between 1 and zero ?

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I know the difference between 9 a side and a full team, do you?

That's mean you get half a side.

You can have that.

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:40 pm
by NSWAFL
Even half a side is better than NONE!

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:41 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Not really, half a side looks like and is a joke, having none means nothing.

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:42 pm
by NSWAFL
Half a side is a little joke. Nothing at all is a monster joke!

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:50 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Having half a side is a joke and looks like a bunch of try hards getting nowhere, having nothing isn't a joke as it's not relevant.

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:51 pm
by NSWAFL
At least they're trying, which is more than can be said for RL!

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:01 am
by ParraEelsNRL
How's Serbian and Lebanon AFL going dickhead?

Do they play?

If not, why aren't they putting in the hard work dumbarse?

Re: Chilean AR is greater than Chilean rl.

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:24 am
by cos789
Sooking parafeel ?