Talking Footy

cast your vote against oppression & an attempt to take this site over by derpballers & turn it into sterile .. snorefest of a site
by voting for the harmless expression " *******" to remain as an acceptable term in the poll that I suspect is being rigged by them anyway.


Beaussie said he doesn't have any problem with the term .. but I can assure you he wouldn't of had the jubblys to vote for its retention

so
cooee .. Eliagh .. Dogs .. Parra ..Kaskill ..scorger man ..

lets all get on
we have a week .. this injustice will not stand
lets not allow these singlet wearing lady boys to ruin this site any more then they have already

Raiderdave wrote:

cast your vote against oppression & an attempt to take this site over by derpballers & turn it into sterile .. snorefest of a site
by voting for the harmless expression " *******" to remain as an acceptable term in the poll that I suspect is being rigged by them anyway.


Beaussie said he doesn't have any problem with the term .. but I can assure you he wouldn't of had the jubblys to vote for its retention

so
cooee .. Eliagh .. Dogs .. Parra ..Kaskill ..scorger man ..

lets all get on
we have a week .. this injustice will not stand
lets not allow these singlet wearing lady boys to ruin this site any more then they have already

In what way has it been ruined already?

In what way is taking one derogatory term away making the site sterile? Is it sterile because I can't call you a black .......?

Or we can't call rugby league mungoball? Oh are we stopping you calling it flogball or giggleball? Are we stopping words like;

Idiot
Fool
Moron
Dummy
Arsehole
Bastard

Any more I haven't listed that are okay, Xman? I haven't got a thesaurus handy.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cast your vote against oppression & an attempt to take this site over by derpballers & turn it into sterile .. snorefest of a site
by voting for the harmless expression " *******" to remain as an acceptable term in the poll that I suspect is being rigged by them anyway.


Beaussie said he doesn't have any problem with the term .. but I can assure you he wouldn't of had the jubblys to vote for its retention

so
cooee .. Eliagh .. Dogs .. Parra ..Kaskill ..scorger man ..

lets all get on
we have a week .. this injustice will not stand
lets not allow these singlet wearing lady boys to ruin this site any more then they have already

In what way has it been ruined already?

In what way is taking one derogatory term away making the site sterile? Is it sterile because I can't call you a black .......?

it won't end there ... thats why , you're already losing it.... whats next .... " Tank Top... Vicky Kicky " ?
& don't compare a term like ******* to racial abuse ... that shows you're desperate already

nuh
your moderating for flogballers only ... already
its a disgrace
an utter disgrace

It's racial abuse, Dave. You're referring to the Victorians as inferior species. We are equal. If you disagree then you are a bigot. And a coward. And you said it yourself. The term isn't limited to AFL fans. You're attacking Storm fans as well.

NSWAFL wrote:

Or we can't call rugby league mungoball? Oh are we stopping you calling it flogball or giggleball? Are we stopping words like;

Idiot
Fool
Moron
Dummy
Arsehole
Bastard

Any more I haven't listed that are okay, Xman? I haven't got a thesaurus handy.

give it a week

they'll all go ......... such is the egomanical nature of our new mod & his pandering to sheilas like you

Leaguies unite
bring this disgraceful attempt to ruin TFC to an end .....

NSWAFL wrote:

It's racial abuse, Dave. You're referring to the Victorians as inferior species. We are equal. If you disagree then you are a bigot. And a coward. And you said it yourself. The term isn't limited to AFL fans. You're attacking Storm fans as well.

******** aren't a race you F wit ..........

You are making them one, idiot.

I agree with this though. Bring this disgraceful attempt to ruin TFC to an end.....by shutting Dave up. Then we can get down to some serious code war brawling! None of the terms I listed will be banned and you have no reason to believe they will, Dave. You're sooking like a kindergarten kid.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

cast your vote against oppression & an attempt to take this site over by derpballers & turn it into sterile .. snorefest of a site
by voting for the harmless expression " *******" to remain as an acceptable term in the poll that I suspect is being rigged by them anyway.


Beaussie said he doesn't have any problem with the term .. but I can assure you he wouldn't of had the jubblys to vote for its retention

so
cooee .. Eliagh .. Dogs .. Parra ..Kaskill ..scorger man ..

lets all get on
we have a week .. this injustice will not stand
lets not allow these singlet wearing lady boys to ruin this site any more then they have already

In what way has it been ruined already?

In what way is taking one derogatory term away making the site sterile? Is it sterile because I can't call you a black .......?

it won't end there ... thats why , you're already losing it.... whats next .... " Tank Top... Vicky Kicky " ?
& don't compare a term like ******* to racial abuse ... that shows you're desperate already

nuh
your moderating for flogballers only ... already
its a disgrace
an utter disgrace

So you're complaining because you think it's just the start of more changes?

It's the only thing I would like to see changed. I even put it to a vote so it wasn't just me and my agenda. This is the agenda of the majority on this site. I'm just enforcing it for them.

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

It's racial abuse, Dave. You're referring to the Victorians as inferior species. We are equal. If you disagree then you are a bigot. And a coward. And you said it yourself. The term isn't limited to AFL fans. You're attacking Storm fans as well.

******** aren't a race you F wit ..........

It's abuse and discrimination according to someone's place of birth.

It is not directed against the people of NSW or QLD in any way. Why? Because its a disgraceful and low act. You think it's fun. Others don't. That's all that maters.

In the workplace the definition of bullying does not dependent on the act itself but whether the target finds it offensive. If they voice their concerns and ask for it to stop it must. Otherwise it is workplace bullying.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

It's racial abuse, Dave. You're referring to the Victorians as inferior species. We are equal. If you disagree then you are a bigot. And a coward. And you said it yourself. The term isn't limited to AFL fans. You're attacking Storm fans as well.

******** aren't a race you F wit ..........

It's abuse and discrimination according to someone's place of birth.

It is not directed against the people of NSW or QLD in any way. Why? Because its a disgraceful and low act. You think it's fun. Others don't. That's all that maters.

In the workplace the definition of bullying does not dependent on the act itself but whether the target finds it offensive. If they voice their concerns and ask for it to stop it must. Otherwise it is workplace bullying.

oh grow up you utter shelia , take your skirt off & put some pants on
I have never met such limp wristed attitudes ... its typical giggleball .... singlet wearing lady boys & its on dislay here

we're not in a work place ...
its a forum
its a fight club
man up you whimp..............

You're a bully and you need to be pulled into line, coward. We are men. You are behaving like a thug in my opinion.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

******** aren't a race you F wit ..........

It's abuse and discrimination according to someone's place of birth.

It is not directed against the people of NSW or QLD in any way. Why? Because its a disgraceful and low act. You think it's fun. Others don't. That's all that maters.

In the workplace the definition of bullying does not dependent on the act itself but whether the target finds it offensive. If they voice their concerns and ask for it to stop it must. Otherwise it is workplace bullying.

oh grow up you utter shelia , take your skirt off & put some pants on
I have never met such limp wristed attitudes ... its typical giggleball .... singlet wearing lady boys & its on dislay here

we're not in a work place ...
its a forum
its a fight club
man up you whimp..............

I'm sure youll adjust to arguing without abuse.

You can do it. :D

Thre are many reasons for wanting to remove abuse.
There are legal implications.
To most it's socially unappealing.
It is totally destructive in having any meaningful discourse.

IMO it seems strange we're debating the acceptance of abuse. It should be a no-brainer.
In reality we are debating the level of accepetance of social discourse.
There are some of us that would like to zero tolerance to abuse and especially personel abuse.
There are some of us that are totally repulsed by some of the language and terms used here.
There are a lot of us that find the repetitive nature of most threads totally tiresome.
There are some of us that would prefer that TFC was run along debating lines.
The reality is that this isn't a debating club (unfortunately) neither is it the cesspool that is L.U.
The common ground is that we want a relaxed atmosphere but we don't want personel abuse, racial abuse, filth and constant repetition.
To those who say that attitude is stifling, I say you know nothing.
It is quite possible to be totally vitriotic within the confines of the rules of debating.
It just takes a little more effort than posting multiple emoticons.

What he said!