Talking Footy

you seem to be avoiding me

I left a question for you in the Cricket Ground re-development thread
got an answer for me ?

no ?

anything ?

crickets chirping

I had to make a tough decision.
It was either listen to the nonsensical ramblings of someone who has the mental capacity of an autistic child or
go for a surf.

Do you know how many nano seconds it tookto think that one over .

A burp machine is never right, except when it burps at the correct time.

Intentcity wrote:

I think with T20 being added cricket probably gets the nod, but only because the Swans only played 8 games there last year, so Dave, you were proven wrong 63 times yesterday and you proved us wrong once today, that makes us 62 up.

I said 8 Cricket days V the 8 Games for the Swans ..
nothing to do with how many games were played by whom

nice to admit you got whopped.. by me ... again

your loud mouth mate came in all gun ho .. but he was packing ... cap guns
while I had a howitzer

A burp will never beat anyone, Intentcity.

Intentcity wrote:

I think with T20 being added cricket probably gets the nod, but only because the Swans only played 8 games there last year, so Dave, you were proven wrong 63 times yesterday and you proved us wrong once today, that makes us 62 up.

Yes, things have change since I lived in Sydney, with the Swans playing games at Homebush and the introduction of T20 and 50/50 before that. The point is we can accept logical reasoning, accept reputable sources and appreciate implication and the degree of importance. Cricket at the SCG, like most cricket grounds of note in Australia has come to depend on the input of Australian Football in part for the development of it's facilties. That should be accepted as fact. If it is not accepted as fact, well then it doesn't matter at all, the facilities are there and they benefit football. IMO it's a synergy that allows Australia to have world class stadia .

Some traditionalists in cricket don't regard T20 as cricket. Just saying.

It's a burp machine, that's why.

cos789 wrote:

Intentcity wrote:

I think with T20 being added cricket probably gets the nod, but only because the Swans only played 8 games there last year, so Dave, you were proven wrong 63 times yesterday and you proved us wrong once today, that makes us 62 up.

Yes, things have change since I lived in Sydney, with the Swans playing games at Homebush and the introduction of T20 and 50/50 before that. The point is we can accept logical reasoning, accept reputable sources and appreciate implication and the degree of importance. Cricket at the SCG, like most cricket grounds of note in Australia has come to depend on the input of Australian Football in part for the development of it's facilties. That should be accepted as fact. If it is not accepted as fact, well then it doesn't matter at all, the facilities are there and they benefit football. IMO it's a synergy that allows Australia to have world class stadia .

ah no... continuing the dribble I've already proven to be snot of the highest order
the SCG... & the GABBA do NOT depend on anything other then cricket

hmmmm... theories on this ?
oh I have one

tank top ball is an irrelavent minor side show that these venues can take or leave .. they don't need it at all
cricket drives their renovations & upgrades
its great for cricket ... & its fans
League fans too .. as we play a handful of games there too each year
minor side shows ... phhhttt .. like a f@rt in an elevator
its there .... you can't do much about it
AFL bludging off the success of other sports is a fact of life up this way ...

And it just went off again.

Another fart.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Another fart.

Should be more pre-occupied with things like this, you'd think.

Why would I care about the dishlickers?

Fans in revolt. You never see that in the AFL.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Why would I care about the dishlickers?

the irrelavance is .... gobsmacking ?