Metro Pay TV ratings on Talking Footy
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:30 am
the TV ratings on this site for 2011 , for all bar the last few months only have the metro pay Tv ratings
not the regionals
now this is the case for both codes ... but its the NRL ratings that are at a distinct disadvantage here
case in point
the Round 4 NRL game between Parramatta & the Cowboys drew a then record ratings haul of 407K
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/04/pay ... ek-14.html
but this site only included the metro figure
PAR http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.phpvs NQL FOX SN 253,000
& then totalled the numbers representing them as all veiwers watching
this is not correct.
As I pointed out the site has only the metro figures for the AFL too in the early part of the season , so they're not correct either
but we all know their regional ratings add probably only a 3rd more to their metro ratings
while regional ratings for the NRL on Pay add up to 60% more veiwers on top of the metro figures that are on average 50% higher then AFL metro ratings to begin with
this means all of the first half of this seasons overall tally's for TV ratings on this site are geared unfairly to the AFL & are not correct for either code or an accurate reflection of the ratings situation when comparing between the 2 codes.
I think this is outrageous & needs to be be fixed
beaussie
please explain.
not the regionals
now this is the case for both codes ... but its the NRL ratings that are at a distinct disadvantage here
case in point
the Round 4 NRL game between Parramatta & the Cowboys drew a then record ratings haul of 407K
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/04/pay ... ek-14.html
but this site only included the metro figure
PAR http://www.talkingfooty.com/tv_ratings_2011.phpvs NQL FOX SN 253,000
& then totalled the numbers representing them as all veiwers watching
this is not correct.
As I pointed out the site has only the metro figures for the AFL too in the early part of the season , so they're not correct either
but we all know their regional ratings add probably only a 3rd more to their metro ratings
while regional ratings for the NRL on Pay add up to 60% more veiwers on top of the metro figures that are on average 50% higher then AFL metro ratings to begin with
this means all of the first half of this seasons overall tally's for TV ratings on this site are geared unfairly to the AFL & are not correct for either code or an accurate reflection of the ratings situation when comparing between the 2 codes.
I think this is outrageous & needs to be be fixed
beaussie
please explain.