Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.Raiderdave wrote:you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once
Masterchef murders SOO......
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been liked: 51 times
Re: Masterchef murders SOO......
Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.TLPG wrote:.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!
1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html
If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Masterchef murders SOO......
insert the same line when referring to Swans ratingsBeaussie wrote:Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.TLPG wrote:.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!
1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html
If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?
but the show that beat them is not the highest non sports show there is .... its.......... a re run of the Brady Bunch :_<>
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
yep yr right so....TLPG wrote:Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.Raiderdave wrote:you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:03 pm
- Team:
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Masterchef murders SOO......
Seems to be a high percentage on women in those cities going by those numbersBeaussie wrote:Wow, massive win for Masterchef and Channel 10 in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth. Massive.TLPG wrote:.....in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth!
1 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Match Nine 2,468,000 1,087,000 338,000 899,000 65,000 79,000
2 State Of Origin Rugby League Qld V Nsw 3rd – Post Match Nine 2,190,000 909,000 275,000 880,000 69,000 57,000
3 Masterchef Australia Wed Ten 1,701,000 402,000 656,000 239,000 200,000 205,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-28-4.html
If the NRL can't rate outside of it's home states with it's biggest mid year event, what chance has it got?
Edited by TLPG - Removed derogatory term
-
- Coach
- Posts: 3478
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
- Team: MYOB
- Location: MYOB
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been liked: 8 times
It has been proven already. The Titans silence to the newspaper article rather than denying it publicly is the act of a guilty party.Raiderdave wrote:yep yr right so....TLPG wrote:Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.Raiderdave wrote:you see if you can disprove it ... & make me look like a fool
for once
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you
Prove otherwise.
And I take it that you don't believe in House Husbands?
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
now your getting your posts mixed upTLPG wrote:It has been proven already. The Titans silence to the newspaper article rather than denying it publicly is the act of a guilty party.Raiderdave wrote:yep yr right so....TLPG wrote:Anyone who demands proof of a negative is losing the battle. You made the claim. You prove it.
you're the doubter .. the one being negative
so under your rules
you have to prove it ... don't you
Prove otherwise.
And I take it that you don't believe in House Husbands?
look back through these posts & you'll see this isn't even what we were talking about here
& house husbands ... WTF ?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 3478
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 9:15 pm
- Team: MYOB
- Location: MYOB
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been liked: 8 times
The house husband comment was intended for Rick, just to clear that up.
And yes, I did get two posts mixed up - so to clarify.....
I said something you said is not correct. I never said that something existed. I said it didn't - in effect. Telling to prove that it didn't is proving a negative, and that is something that you do not ask for. The onus is on you - not me.
So - prove to me that the term "rugby league" was first used in Australia in 1908.
And yes, I did get two posts mixed up - so to clarify.....
I said something you said is not correct. I never said that something existed. I said it didn't - in effect. Telling to prove that it didn't is proving a negative, and that is something that you do not ask for. The onus is on you - not me.
So - prove to me that the term "rugby league" was first used in Australia in 1908.
THIS FORUM IS RACIST
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
so you want me to do what I;ve done a dozen times since I've been posting hereTLPG wrote:The house husband comment was intended for Rick, just to clear that up.
And yes, I did get two posts mixed up - so to clarify.....
I said something you said is not correct. I never said that something existed. I said it didn't - in effect. Telling to prove that it didn't is proving a negative, and that is something that you do not ask for. The onus is on you - not me.
So - prove to me that the term "rugby league" was first used in Australia in 1908.
you ask me to prove something I claim infering I'm not correct.. & I do proving you wrong
why would I want to do that ..... again
I'm sick of doing all the work in this relationship
for something entirely different
you prove me wrong ...... for once
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
you haven't looked very hard ........have youTLPG wrote:You're asking me for information that doesn't exist. I say the term was NOT first used in Australia. In any year. That is the meaning of my objection. (As a side note - see that I am prepared to explain myself, unlike Raider!)
YOU prove ME wrong.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16700
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests