GET RID OF SPECIAL COMMENTS COMMENTATORS
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:07 pm
WHY DO WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH ANNOYING COMMENTATORS WITH THEIR OPINIONS...WHY NOT JUST CALL THE GAME AS LOU RICHARDS AND PETER LANDY USED TO...
Talking Footy
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
GET RID OF SPECIAL COMMENTS COMMENTATORS
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 4:52 pm
True. Have to agree/ Just verbal diarea
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:56 pm
Special comments commentators are good for those that don't understand the game that well - especially up here in Sydney next year with new GWS fans tuning in. I think Leigh Matthews and Paul Roos are the best - some of the others are pretty average though.
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:37 am
Agreed that they are required need and Leigh and Roos are probably the best going round.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:53 am
I agree as well, and bye bye Robert Walls!
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:29 am
Good riddance to Walls and Lane. Ten's coverage this season since losing out on the AFL tv rights has really gone downhill.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:55 pm
I can't stand Tim Watson
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:14 pm
Tim's okay, Beau. With him it depends on who he's working with.Beaussie wrote:Good riddance to Walls and Lane. Ten's coverage this season since losing out on the AFL tv rights has really gone downhill.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:04 am
I can't stand Tim Lane or the Ten commentary team when the Swans are involved. So negative. A real turn off if you ask me.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:06 am
yes get rid of some to many
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:07 am
Beaussies money, mwall wants it!mwall wrote:yes get rid of some to many
Re:
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:19 pm
I tend to disagree with that.powerful wrote:Special comments commentators are good for those that don't understand the game that well .
Background observations can be enlightening to the seasoned viewer - interchanges, injuries ,tactics etc.
The problem is that stations feel obliged to use their full team even when not required.