South Australia all out for 29

Whether it be cricket, golf, basketball, tennis, boxing or any other sport - this is the place for you.
Post Reply
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9920
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 232 times
Been liked: 51 times

South Australia all out for 29

Post by Beaussie »

Just saw on the news that SA were all out for 29 against NSW with Nathan Bracken taking 7 wickets. :shock:
crocodileman
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Post by crocodileman »

Yeah, saw that. :shock: Seven wickets for four runs - would have to be the highest wickets to runs ratio in first class cricket.
User avatar
Dizzys_on_fire
Reserves
Reserves
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:11 pm
Team:
Location: Great Lakes
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Post by Dizzys_on_fire »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jason Gillespie - 54* (155)

Formerly Uppy80
User avatar
Mikey G
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:22 pm
Team:
Location: Central Coast of NSW
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Post by Mikey G »

That's appaling. What about a test match between South Australia and New Zealand? That'd surely have more interest in it than the one-sided games we've seen so far.

Bring on the VB Series. :lol:
I've lost my mind. Please help me find it.
crocodileman
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Post by crocodileman »

Mikey G wrote:
That's appaling. What about a test match between South Australia and New Zealand? That'd surely have more interest in it than the one-sided games we've seen so far.

Bring on the VB Series. :lol:
I agree - bring on the one-dayers.

BTW - I reckon the South Aussies would beat NZ in a 4 day game! :lol:
MG
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Post by MG »

last thing i heard nsw were 4-360 or something like that so the conditions were ok i guess. they must be pretty embarassed by that.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests