www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Let's be honest Xman, it's not much of an achievement to have more members than the smallest team in the AFL and nRL combined.Xman wrote:Supporters are supporters Dave. And the giants have more than the raiders!
Wow, just WOW!!!! =D> =D> =D>
Tue Stewie, true.Stewie wrote:Let's be honest Xman, it's not much of an achievement to have more members than the smallest team in the AFL and nRL combined.Xman wrote:Supporters are supporters Dave. And the giants have more than the raiders!
Wow, just WOW!!!! =D> =D> =D>
Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.Raiderdave wrote:why do we need to compete with the size of our spend in our football dept
in the NRL ... its the quality of your roster & the people behind it
not the amount you spend
example ... the 2 lowest football Dept Budgets in the NRL ( Raiders & Sharks .. both will spend 15 Million in 2013 )
are both tipped to have huge years on field
& easily out perform the biggest football dept spend in the NRL .. the Broncos (38M )
if this happens ... that will be extraordinary & an amazing result
but something that just doesn't ... in fact .. can't happen in the VFL
its the size of your spend in the VFL ... the haves always ahead of the have nots on the field..only because they spend more
Xman wrote:Supporters are supporters Dave. And the giants have more than the raiders!
Wow, just WOW!!!! =D> =D> =D>
Giants... bigger crowds and more members than the pathetic arse Raiders.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Supporters are supporters Dave. And the giants have more than the raiders!
Wow, just WOW!!!! =D> =D> =D>
they have way less you delusional tool ..... & always will
how can vicky kicky cheerleaders , religious zealots in singlets & tight shorts in .... Melbourne , or Perth or Adelaide
who don't really have any interest in the midgets , but more so the silly little game they follow succeed , so buy a cheap $30 interstate .. fridge magnet membership ... & will never .. ever attend a midgets game
be called supporters
midgets
half as popular as the raiders
soon to be a 1/3
Drac wrote:Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.Raiderdave wrote:why do we need to compete with the size of our spend in our football dept
in the NRL ... its the quality of your roster & the people behind it
not the amount you spend
example ... the 2 lowest football Dept Budgets in the NRL ( Raiders & Sharks .. both will spend 15 Million in 2013 )
are both tipped to have huge years on field
& easily out perform the biggest football dept spend in the NRL .. the Broncos (38M )
if this happens ... that will be extraordinary & an amazing result
but something that just doesn't ... in fact .. can't happen in the VFL
its the size of your spend in the VFL ... the haves always ahead of the have nots on the field..only because they spend more
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.Raiderdave wrote:why do we need to compete with the size of our spend in our football dept
in the NRL ... its the quality of your roster & the people behind it
not the amount you spend
example ... the 2 lowest football Dept Budgets in the NRL ( Raiders & Sharks .. both will spend 15 Million in 2013 )
are both tipped to have huge years on field
& easily out perform the biggest football dept spend in the NRL .. the Broncos (38M )
if this happens ... that will be extraordinary & an amazing result
but something that just doesn't ... in fact .. can't happen in the VFL
its the size of your spend in the VFL ... the haves always ahead of the have nots on the field..only because they spend more
the Bullfrogs ?............. I'm talking this century you cockhead
they haven't been near anything in about 15 years
& the Swines cheat the cap every year under the guise of a " living allowance crock of shit claus " ... they shouldn't be included in any discussion ....
about anything
nope
VFL
if your have money you may win the comp
if you don't
you never will
in the NRL... this is just not the case
you fucking IDIOT! The Bulldogs made the prelim final in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Go and get educated on the subject or fuck off you wankstain. 
Stewie wrote:Giants... bigger crowds and more members than the pathetic arse Raiders.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Supporters are supporters Dave. And the giants have more than the raiders!
Wow, just WOW!!!! =D> =D> =D>
they have way less you delusional tool ..... & always will
how can vicky kicky cheerleaders , religious zealots in singlets & tight shorts in .... Melbourne , or Perth or Adelaide
who don't really have any interest in the midgets , but more so the silly little game they follow succeed , so buy a cheap $30 interstate .. fridge magnet membership ... & will never .. ever attend a midgets game
be called supporters
midgets
half as popular as the raiders
soon to be a 1/3
Geelong, not even close to a wealthy AFL club, have been the most successful AFL club of the last century!Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.Raiderdave wrote:why do we need to compete with the size of our spend in our football dept
in the NRL ... its the quality of your roster & the people behind it
not the amount you spend
example ... the 2 lowest football Dept Budgets in the NRL ( Raiders & Sharks .. both will spend 15 Million in 2013 )
are both tipped to have huge years on field
& easily out perform the biggest football dept spend in the NRL .. the Broncos (38M )
if this happens ... that will be extraordinary & an amazing result
but something that just doesn't ... in fact .. can't happen in the VFL
its the size of your spend in the VFL ... the haves always ahead of the have nots on the field..only because they spend more
the Bullfrogs ?............. I'm talking this century you cockhead
they haven't been near anything in about 15 years
& the Swines cheat the cap every year under the guise of a " living allowance crock of shit claus " ... they shouldn't be included in any discussion ....
about anything
nope
VFL
if your have money you may win the comp
if you don't
you never will
in the NRL... this is just not the case
and 2011Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.
the Bullfrogs ?............. I'm talking this century you cockhead
they haven't been near anything in about 15 years
& the Swines cheat the cap every year under the guise of a " living allowance crock of shit claus " ... they shouldn't be included in any discussion ....
about anything
nope
VFL
if your have money you may win the comp
if you don't
you never will
in the NRL... this is just not the case
bigger than the 3000 at Raiders games!Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Giants... bigger crowds and more members than the pathetic arse Raiders.Raiderdave wrote:
they have way less you delusional tool ..... & always will
how can vicky kicky cheerleaders , religious zealots in singlets & tight shorts in .... Melbourne , or Perth or Adelaide
who don't really have any interest in the midgets , but more so the silly little game they follow succeed , so buy a cheap $30 interstate .. fridge magnet membership ... & will never .. ever attend a midgets game
be called supporters
midgets
half as popular as the raiders
soon to be a 1/3
bigger crowds ?
4000 a game .................?
the Raiders averaged ova 11,000 despite being near the bottom of the NRL ladder til round 18
only a vicky kicky halfwitted knob ... witha vicky kicky calculator can come up with this equation
Raiders twice as big as the Midgets
soon to be 3 times bigger
And you said the Bulldogs haven't been near anything for 15 years. DumbarseRaiderdave wrote:and 2011Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
the Bullfrogs ?............. I'm talking this century you cockhead
they haven't been near anything in about 15 years
& the Swines cheat the cap every year under the guise of a " living allowance crock of shit claus " ... they shouldn't be included in any discussion ....
about anything
nope
VFL
if your have money you may win the comp
if you don't
you never will
in the NRL... this is just not the case
your cockhead mate said 4 in a row ?
Xman wrote:Geelong, not even close to a wealthy AFL club, have been the most successful AFL club of the last century!Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Bulldogs made 4 prelims in a row spending peanuts on their football department, Swans just won a flag. ******.
the Bullfrogs ?............. I'm talking this century you cockhead
they haven't been near anything in about 15 years
& the Swines cheat the cap every year under the guise of a " living allowance crock of shit claus " ... they shouldn't be included in any discussion ....
about anything
nope
VFL
if your have money you may win the comp
if you don't
you never will
in the NRL... this is just not the case
Nice one Davedunce!
Sorry Raiderdave, but no matter how much you keep on saying this, it doesn't make it true. You're just going to have to accept the fact that the Giants are bigger than the Raiders in crowds and memberships. The Raiders could be bigger, but since the nRL ignore them and give them a shit deal on FTA TV, they find it very difficult to expand their brand.Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Giants... bigger crowds and more members than the pathetic arse Raiders.Raiderdave wrote:
they have way less you delusional tool ..... & always will
how can vicky kicky cheerleaders , religious zealots in singlets & tight shorts in .... Melbourne , or Perth or Adelaide
who don't really have any interest in the midgets , but more so the silly little game they follow succeed , so buy a cheap $30 interstate .. fridge magnet membership ... & will never .. ever attend a midgets game
be called supporters
midgets
half as popular as the raiders
soon to be a 1/3
bigger crowds ?
4000 a game .................?
the Raiders averaged ova 11,000 despite being near the bottom of the NRL ladder til round 18
only a vicky kicky halfwitted knob ... witha vicky kicky calculator can come up with this equation
Raiders twice as big as the Midgets
soon to be 3 times bigger
we'd get 3000 to a BBQ dickheadXman wrote:bigger than the 3000 at Raiders games!Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Giants... bigger crowds and more members than the pathetic arse Raiders.
bigger crowds ?
4000 a game .................?
the Raiders averaged ova 11,000 despite being near the bottom of the NRL ladder til round 18
only a vicky kicky halfwitted knob ... witha vicky kicky calculator can come up with this equation
Raiders twice as big as the Midgets
soon to be 3 times bigger