Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Suggesting their numbers are in accurate is not accusing them of fraud because hes not saying its deliberate! He never said that! Platypus!

its slanderous ..... ban NSWAFL now for again ... putting this site in jeopardy .

Sooky Sooky La La! I spoke the truth and I can never be sued successfully for that!

NSWAFL wrote:

Sooky Sooky La La! I spoke the truth and I can never be sued successfully for that!

slanderous .... Bearsy .. hand ova his details now
or its your site as defendant

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Suggesting their numbers are in accurate is not accusing them of fraud because hes not saying its deliberate! He never said that! Platypus!

its slanderous ..... ban NSWAFL now for again ... putting this site in jeopardy .

So which is it? Fraud or slander?

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Sooky Sooky La La! I spoke the truth and I can never be sued successfully for that!

slanderous .... Bearsy .. hand ova his details now
or its your site as defendant

Liar. There is no legal action.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Suggesting their numbers are in accurate is not accusing them of fraud because hes not saying its deliberate! He never said that! Platypus!

its slanderous ..... ban NSWAFL now for again ... putting this site in jeopardy .

So which is it? Fraud or slander?

accusations of fraud .... are slanderous shi.t for brains

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

its slanderous ..... ban NSWAFL now for again ... putting this site in jeopardy .

So which is it? Fraud or slander?

accusations of fraud .... are slanderous shi.t for brains

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an
untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person
defamed.

Fraud: intentional perversion of truth in order to induce
another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right

They are totally different. He never accused them of fraud because that involves accusing them of deliberately distorting the truth.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

So which is it? Fraud or slander?

accusations of fraud .... are slanderous shi.t for brains

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an
untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person
defamed.

Fraud: intentional perversion of truth in order to induce
another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right

They are totally different. He never accused them of fraud because that involves accusing them of deliberately distorting the truth.

Yes he did

law suit on its way ........ contact details now

or this site becomes the named defendant

Go ahead, Dave.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

accusations of fraud .... are slanderous shi.t for brains

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an
untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person
defamed.

Fraud: intentional perversion of truth in order to induce
another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right

They are totally different. He never accused them of fraud because that involves accusing them of deliberately distorting the truth.

Yes he did

law suit on its way ........ contact details now

or this site becomes the named defendant

I havent seen one post where he questions the reason for their unreliable results. Feel free to quote one.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an
untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person
defamed.

Fraud: intentional perversion of truth in order to induce
another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right

They are totally different. He never accused them of fraud because that involves accusing them of deliberately distorting the truth.

Yes he did

law suit on its way ........ contact details now

or this site becomes the named defendant

I havent seen one post where he questions the reason for their unreliable results. Feel free to quote one.

its heavily implied ..... a jailhouse bitch ... is wot NSWAFL will become

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Yes he did

law suit on its way ........ contact details now

or this site becomes the named defendant

I havent seen one post where he questions the reason for their unreliable results. Feel free to quote one.

its heavily implied ..... a jailhouse bitch ... is wot NSWAFL will become

Heavily implied!

You fool! All he has done is question their accuracy, like most other sensible people would do. They were never designed to measure the entire regional audience, just a sample of the most populated regions. They should never be used to gauge overall sporting popularity because there are just too many holes which are clearly shown by the gross inconsistencies we see every year.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I havent seen one post where he questions the reason for their unreliable results. Feel free to quote one.

its heavily implied ..... a jailhouse bitch ... is wot NSWAFL will become

Heavily implied!

You fool! All he has done is question their accuracy, like most other sensible people would do. They were never designed to measure the entire regional audience, just a sample of the most populated regions. They should never be used to gauge overall sporting popularity because there are just too many holes which are clearly shown by the gross inconsistencies we see every year.

hes questioned their professionalism ... their integrity .. sullied their reputation publically


don't drop the soap in the shower NSWAFL

then again .... you'd probably drop it on purpose ..... repeatidly >

Show me where he questioned their integrity or professionalism!

Xman wrote:

Show me where he questioned their integrity or professionalism!

by claiming their figures are false ..untrue .. inaccurate ... shoddy ... .. so. therefore he is claiming they are unprofessional which is slanderous & libelous

NSWAFL is ggoooonnnneeeee