Talking Footy

Another belting for the nrlol!

So 1.89m to 1.28m

That's 1-0 for the head to head finals comparison. Any excuses but but fans?

I think the important figure for the AFL is how games rate outside heartland. AFL have done okay with games so far. Last nights game did well in Sydney and Brisbane given no Sydney or Brisbane team. The nrl would be concerned with Adelaide and Perth ratings I would think although I get the feeling whereas these ratings are important to the AFL the nrl don't seem like it is as important m? Thoughts ?

Fred wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:57 pm

I think the important figure for the AFL is how games rate outside heartland. AFL have done okay with games so far. Last nights game did well in Sydney and Brisbane given no Sydney or Brisbane team. The nrl would be concerned with Adelaide and Perth ratings I would think although I get the feeling whereas these ratings are important to the AFL the nrl don't seem like it is as important m? Thoughts ?

Fuck you're a dickhead

You say the AFL did Ok because in non heartland states seeing as there was no home team
Then you say the NRl would be worried about ratings in Perth & Adelaide ...
Ok Mr hypocrite
Where was the home team from Adelaide or Perth in the NRl game

This is why you dickheads are laughed at .
In AFL it's ok
Same in NRL..not good .

So let me get this right.

In Sydney there was no local team playing and I comment that the ratings were okay for Sydney given this.

In Adelaide and Perth there was no local team playing (there are none) and the nrl game rated pathetically.

Am I missing something here ? It's been a few scotches so possible so please enlighten me.

In short .. AFL rated okay in non heartland cities with no local team. Nrl rated poorly in non heartland cities of Perth and Adelaide.

They also rated poorly in Melbourne I see.

NlolRL wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:24 pm

So 1.89m to 1.28m

That's 1-0 for the head to head finals comparison. Any excuses but but fans?

Yes LOL, you must be very proud of the AFL's achievements.Your highest total getting half the ratings of the NRL's highest game. And yes another Silver medal for the total ratings as well. Well done

pussycat wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:18 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:24 pm

So 1.89m to 1.28m

That's 1-0 for the head to head finals comparison. Any excuses but but fans?

Yes LOL, you must be very proud of the AFL's achievements.Your highest total getting half the ratings of the NRL's highest game. And yes another Silver medal for the total ratings as well. Well done

it wont be our highest total though, thats in a few weeks. Our final smashed yours under the same conditions. But but but SOO........

Would be good to compare home and away of each as well as finals.

but? what? 3 matches all nealy twice your best...................awe but but but we don't have them we don't have them .......... shoudnt count waar waar waar

pussycat wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:04 pm

but? what? 3 matches all nealy twice your best...................awe but but but we don't have them we don't have them .......... shoudnt count waar waar waar

err, we havent played our best game this year yet dickhead. Thats literally all you have. 3 big games, then you're massacred for the rest of the year

Sydney ratings for SYD v ESS will be massive.

Overall ratings for PORT v WCE will be unbelievable.

Hopefully we get to see how many watched Extra Time at 10:30pm!

NlolRL wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:10 pm

pussycat wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:04 pm

but? what? 3 matches all nealy twice your best...................awe but but but we don't have them we don't have them .......... shoudnt count waar waar waar

err, we havent played our best game this year yet dickhead. Thats literally all you have. 3 big games, then you're massacred for the rest of the year

3 big games and we get more ratings every single year and thats with less games Wow....but but but but but club footballs all that you have. If you fumblers didn't have just one thing to focus on your farked up world might be a little bit different.

pussycat wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:35 am

NlolRL wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:10 pm

pussycat wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:04 pm

but? what? 3 matches all nealy twice your best...................awe but but but we don't have them we don't have them .......... shoudnt count waar waar waar

err, we havent played our best game this year yet dickhead. Thats literally all you have. 3 big games, then you're massacred for the rest of the year

3 big games and we get more ratings every single year and thats with less games Wow....but but but but but club footballs all that you have. If you fumblers didn't have just one thing to focus on your farked up world might be a little bit different.

Hey pissycat where do all those fan go from the state vs state soo games!

The nrlol struggle to sell already heavily discounted tickets & are getting flogged in the ratings

But but but

The_Wookie wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:47 pm

pussycat wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:35 am

3 big games and we get more ratings every single year and thats with less games Wow....but but but but but club footballs all that you have.

And yet its not entirely that black and white is it now and never has been.

The NRLs simple majority doesnt overcome the AFLs ratings over more broadcast time - effectively doubling the AFls ratings per game when compared to NRL ones by virtue of its extended time coverage, a fact which ive never seen an NRL person acknowledge.

Lol
Really talk about grasping at straws
& to use your methodology
When broken down into which sport is more valuable per minute
RL wins
Lol yet that is scoffed at .