Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote: Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:51 am

Straight over your tiny skull.

Tasmania do not attend local AFL games in decent numbers, your point shows this. Games in Hobart have small crowds which are far smaller when the giants play because these crowds are made up of travelling fans, not locals so much.

If you think the AFL are wasting money on expansion compared to propping up a small tasmanian club thats your opinion. Not everyone agrees though

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:00 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:51 am

Straight over your tiny skull.

Tasmania do not attend local AFL games in decent numbers, your point shows this. Games in Hobart have small crowds which are far smaller when the giants play because these crowds are made up of travelling fans, not locals so much.

If you think the AFL are wasting money on expansion compared to propping up a small tasmanian club thats your opinion. Not everyone agrees though

Nlol my dear little gosling, I’m afraid once again that you’re just plain wrong in ur assumption. I’m sorry to bring you the bad news but the fact the giants bring significantly lower crowds to stadiums wherever they fly blows ur small minded theory out of the water.

Sorry chump, you’re just wrong again.

Please, do pickup yer game in 2019.

Thanks and warm regards,
KING

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:50 pm

You still havent provided a decent reason why the AFL would have an agenda against a team in Hobart

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:55 pm

Let's apply loler logic to WA
West Coke eagles founded in 86 .
Freemantle founded in 94 .
Why was freemantle allowed in to the AFL
There was already a club for Wa people to follow but more importantly those who didn't would have already had a club in the AFL .
So why why why .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 2:20 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:55 pm

Let's apply loler logic to WA
West Coke eagles founded in 86 .
Freemantle founded in 94 .
Why was freemantle allowed in to the AFL
There was already a club for Wa people to follow but more importantly those who didn't would have already had a club in the AFL .
So why why why .

Bump .
& I've already answered your question .
AFL bosses Vlad .gill have an agenda ..they get their own way .
& NOT giving tas a team is at the top .
It has nothing to do with viable or the future .
If viability was a concern then the THUNS would be gone instead of swallowing millions in a bottomless black money hole pit.

pussycat wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:50 pm

You still havent provided a decent reason why the AFL would have an agenda against a team in Hobart

4% of Tasmanian's are aboriginal!

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:03 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 2:20 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:55 pm

Let's apply loler logic to WA
West Coke eagles founded in 86 .
Freemantle founded in 94 .
Why was freemantle allowed in to the AFL
There was already a club for Wa people to follow but more importantly those who didn't would have already had a club in the AFL .
So why why why .

Bump .
& I've already answered your question .
AFL bosses Vlad .gill have an agenda ..they get their own way .
& NOT giving tas a team is at the top .
It has nothing to do with viable or the future .
If viability was a concern then the THUNS would be gone instead of swallowing millions in a bottomless black money hole pit.

nothing to do with viability? You've excluded a reason but havent come up with an alternative. Getting their own way isnt a reason.

Fremantle were introduced into the comp because Perth has 2mil people and Fremantle were a powerful club in the WAFL

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:54 pm

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:00 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:51 am

Straight over your tiny skull.

Tasmania do not attend local AFL games in decent numbers, your point shows this. Games in Hobart have small crowds which are far smaller when the giants play because these crowds are made up of travelling fans, not locals so much.

If you think the AFL are wasting money on expansion compared to propping up a small tasmanian club thats your opinion. Not everyone agrees though

Nlol my dear little gosling, I’m afraid once again that you’re just plain wrong in ur assumption. I’m sorry to bring you the bad news but the fact the giants bring significantly lower crowds to stadiums wherever they fly blows ur small minded theory out of the water.

Sorry chump, you’re just wrong again.

Please, do pickup yer game in 2019.

Thanks and warm regards,
KING

Of course they have lower crowds, they have very few supporters however the point is hobart dont have a team so their crowds are made up from the traveling fans plus a few locals. When the giants play in hobart it shows the crowd is made up from predominantly one of the traveling teams fans and very few locals.

Yep, you keep proving my point lol

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:06 pm

pussycat wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:56 pm

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:50 pm

You still havent provided a decent reason why the AFL would have an agenda against a team in Hobart

4% of Tasmanian's are aboriginal!

which would mean the AFL are favouring indigenous AFL fans by having teams in other Australian states with higher proportions

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Jan 01, 2019 12:56 am

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:03 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 2:20 pm

Bump .
& I've already answered your question .
AFL bosses Vlad .gill have an agenda ..they get their own way .
& NOT giving tas a team is at the top .
It has nothing to do with viable or the future .
If viability was a concern then the THUNS would be gone instead of swallowing millions in a bottomless black money hole pit.

nothing to do with viability? You've excluded a reason but havent come up with an alternative. Getting their own way isnt a reason.

Fremantle were introduced into the comp because Perth has 2mil people and Fremantle were a powerful club in the WAFL

Lol,
So you suddenly forget about the " fans would already have an AFL club to follow" excuse when it's somewhere else but Tas .
Fucking hypocrite .

King-Eliagh wrote: Tue Jan 01, 2019 7:25 am

NlolRL wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:54 pm

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:00 pm

Nlol my dear little gosling, I’m afraid once again that you’re just plain wrong in ur assumption. I’m sorry to bring you the bad news but the fact the giants bring significantly lower crowds to stadiums wherever they fly blows ur small minded theory out of the water.

Sorry chump, you’re just wrong again.

Please, do pickup yer game in 2019.

Thanks and warm regards,
KING

Of course they have lower crowds, they have very few supporters however the point is hobart dont have a team so their crowds are made up from the traveling fans plus a few locals. When the giants play in hobart it shows the crowd is made up from predominantly one of the traveling teams fans and very few locals.

Yep, you keep proving my point lol

Where are your marbles?
So by your theory the reason Carlton and other melb crowds that drop markedly when gws come to town is because the crowds are made up predominantly by travelling fans and a few locals?

Thick as a brick this one. Jesus nlol, you used to be smarter dude. What happened?