Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:13 pm

look at these AFL supporters go!

[BBvideo=][/BBvideo]

Lol keep ignoring my comment eliagh!
Considering affairs happen all the time, in and out side of workplaces, the AFL officials private business has become public, possibly lost their jobs, the girls have laid no charges & personal lives of all parties are probably effected out of this

It has you Virgins attempting to take the moral high ground & getting your diapers on a twist creating conspiracies

It's been explained
You ignore it .
The great & mighty MORAL AFL ...the bastions of all things moral in AUST sport ..
Chest beating about leading the way in women's issues ..the fight against racism etc .

Lol
Looks like the morals are lip. Service .

You don't want to be seen as hypocrites ..don't talk shit about moral issues

Lol
Only because it was leaked to the media .
What would they have done if it wasn't leaked .
My bet..fuck all .

Nope
don't have to be

Past history is a good guide

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2017 8:43 am

Past history is a good guide

then every NRL crowd is exaggerated

Lol deflection alert

DeAr lord just listen to the AFL clowns making absolute fools of emselves in here

Lemme respond and break it down nice and clear for you dumbos.

AFL dumbo argument number one - affairs in workplaces are normal, the happen all the time I.e move along there's nothing to see here

Yeah duh, of course affairs happen in workplaces. But when older ageing men who hold considerable power and status in an organisation are fucking around with far younger ladies who are not in the same esteemed high paying roles then there's clearly a very high chance that ethical lines have been crossed.

AFL dumbo argument number two - the AFL have acted and the men have been sacked so I.e nothing to see here

Ummm dumbos? the fact the men were sacked assures us that it has been judged that these relationships were very unethical. Comprehende? And then ur dumbfuck ceo states, these two guys are my mates great men and we'd welcome them back!!!


The fact that many of you AFL dumbos are using both argument one and two also highlights ur stupidity. Arguing for point one 'affairs happen all the time' and then stating 'the AFL have dealt with it and sacked em' is a hilarious contradiction which I think you space heads can't even see

^^^^ Contradicting himself again!

First he says there was no suggestion of any inappropriate behaviour outside of the affair itself then he says there's no disputing the unethical side of it. Wookie answer this.

If there's no suggestion of any unethical behaviour why is it that two men were sacked and the two women are not?

Dear lord ur dumb. I mean if it was all fine and dandy and just an affair between two consenting adults with no unethical abuse of power why are these two men not arguing to keep their jobs and livelihoods??

Seriously, in ur next post try hard not to contradict urself again!

And if it's just "perception" of wrongdoing as the reason the AFL sacked em then what the fukk kind of precedent is that!

finally you are now stating "its unethical as a workplace violation" and "higher standards are expected of men in higher positions" well done wookie you're starting to see the light.

So with ur King Eliagh inspired newfound knowledge it's now time you also question the afls toxic sexist culture. You've stated what the men did was unethical so what do you think now about
The CEOs claiming of them as mates, great men who he would welcome back?
it's time you start now questioning the toxic sexist culture which is prominent in the AFL institution wookie

An my other question remains unanswered by you wookie. Why aren't the two men fighting for their livelihoods?

And ur gal prof lumby also stated that there is an abuse of power issue that should be looked at.

Seriously it's time you wake up and smell the roses and state that these two men are clearly guilty and the AFL ceo should not promote a toxic sexist culture by welcoming them back.

I mean seriously wookie!

The_Wookie wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:20 am

he raises a point. You've said that past history is a good guide, but in the past have also slammed folks for bringing up past history as a guide to nrl crowd inflation. There is som irony.

Ill note there is currently rumours of an affair between senior execs at NRL HQ.
https://www.triplem.com.au/sport/nrl/ne ... -an-affair

& the point I've made repeatedly & you mob keep ignoring is that the AFL have set themselves up as a bastion of morality for women ...racism etc
Of course the shit will hit the fan when its exposed that it's a facade.
It's all about the image

If what you posted above is true
I'm sure the media will have a field day with RL.
Only difference is the ARLC won't have egg on its face like the AFL .

Lol difference being .
Nearly all Rl fans know what the media does with any negative Rl story
We won't be grabbing the pitchforks & heading to head office .
Because head office doesn't get on the soapbox like the AFL do
There's a lot of AFL fans who believe the propaganda that AFL house produce .
The we are morally superior to other codes crap they like to chest beat about .

Yeah I was thinking the same

Go read BF Wookie
You should know the shit they post about How bad RL player behaviour is .

Lol just go back to see a few of the threads started on here about player behaviour .

Make up your mind
You posted
You don't know a single AFL FAN .
So what is it AFL house or AFL fans