Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Bullshit.
I stated something.
He claimed I said something else..He says I STATED ..I never fucking stated what he claimed..

Where is the proof..
There is none .

& the opinion bit is a fucking COP OUT.
It means you can change whatever anyone posts & hide behind its an opinion.

No its a joke.

He actually said you insinuated it, not said it directly. The insinuation is his interpretation which I, like you, think is wrong. I've asked him to apologise but what else would you like me to do? Ban him for an opinion? Hmmm, thats a great precedent

He did not .

Here it is.
In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over.
..
He fucking lied .
Pure & simple.
Strange that you agreed with me a few pages ago ,yet do nothing about it.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

He did not .

Here it is.
In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over.
..
He fucking lied .
Pure & simple.
Strange that you agreed with me a few pages ago ,yet do nothing about it.

Where in that comment did he say YOU actually stated that? He didnt say that. He said "in effect". He summarised what he believed you meant

In Effect is going to get a big run in here.

Got a ready made Cop out for anything I post.
Thanks

AFLcrap1 wrote:

In Effect is going to get a big run in here.

Got a ready made Cop out for anything I post.
Thanks

You can give any opinion you like, as long as it stays within the forum rules

Xman wrote:

I can't straighten out opinions, theyre entitled to have them, even if theyre wrong. I'd suggest you ignore it because you know youre right just like I know youre right. There's a fair chance cracker is simply trolling

No. I repudiate the accusation.

And I maintain, Xman, that you are wrong. You are entitled to that opinion if you wish, but you can't change the view that AFLcrap1 is refusing to admit that in the process of making the statement that he made he left himself open for the correct accusation of insinuating that the NRL looked after their players in a job sense and financial sense than the AFL. The insinuation lies in the fact that he was by his own admission responding to a post where the NRL was being rightly attacked. The manner in which AFLcrap1 responded could only have been anti AFL. He could not avoid the insinuation. He could only avoid actually saying it (which he did). If he wanted to avoid the insinuation, there was only one way to do. Say nothing at all.

As AFLcrap1 won't admit to the issue it should now be considered closed under the auspices of "agreeing to disagree".

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

I can't straighten out opinions, theyre entitled to have them, even if theyre wrong. I'd suggest you ignore it because you know youre right just like I know youre right. There's a fair chance cracker is simply trolling

No. I repudiate the accusation.

And I maintain, Xman, that you are wrong. You are entitled to that opinion if you wish, but you can't change the view that AFLcrap1 is refusing to admit that in the process of making the statement that he made he left himself open for the correct accusation of insinuating that the NRL looked after their players in a job sense and financial sense than the AFL. The insinuation lies in the fact that he was by his own admission responding to a post where the NRL was being rightly attacked. The manner in which AFLcrap1 responded could only have been anti AFL. He could not avoid the insinuation. He could only avoid actually saying it (which he did). If he wanted to avoid the insinuation, there was only one way to do. Say nothing at all.

As AFLcrap1 won't admit to the issue it should now be considered closed under the auspices of "agreeing to disagree".

.

Fucking liar.
You got caught.
Deal with it.
Once again .
You are a fucking liar..

Cracker's right! In fricking spades! The end!

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

I can't straighten out opinions, theyre entitled to have them, even if theyre wrong. I'd suggest you ignore it because you know youre right just like I know youre right. There's a fair chance cracker is simply trolling

No. I repudiate the accusation.

And I maintain, Xman, that you are wrong. You are entitled to that opinion if you wish, but you can't change the view that AFLcrap1 is refusing to admit that in the process of making the statement that he made he left himself open for the correct accusation of insinuating that the NRL looked after their players in a job sense and financial sense than the AFL. The insinuation lies in the fact that he was by his own admission responding to a post where the NRL was being rightly attacked. The manner in which AFLcrap1 responded could only have been anti AFL. He could not avoid the insinuation. He could only avoid actually saying it (which he did). If he wanted to avoid the insinuation, there was only one way to do. Say nothing at all.

As AFLcrap1 won't admit to the issue it should now be considered closed under the auspices of "agreeing to disagree".

AFLcs claim was under attack by AFL fans, not the AFL. His response was against AFL fans, not the AFLs approach. Proof of this is he never mentioned AFL, only replied to AFL fans on this site.

The fact is AFLc knows the intention of his post, you're merely guessing. You got it wrong as shown by AFLcs subsequent explanation. You need to accept his explanation and apologise for jumping the gun and putting your own incorrect interpretation on his comment

So you're saying I got it wrong as well, Xman? And so did Swans?

Seriously??

His response was against the AFL as a fricking whole!!! He never limited it in any way shape or form until after he was called out on it! Like Cracker, I don't fricking believe him! The OP attacked the NRL. Any NRL fan in reply would have to be at least thinking "attack the AFL"! Unless they are suffering from some sort of impairment!

Oh wait, edit. He DOES have an impairment! I've got the proof in my email! I forgot for a minute!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Cracker's right! In fricking spades! The end!

did someone break wind ?


oh
silly me
it was just CWAPPER attempting to contribute

very similar sound n all

Look who's talking!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So you're saying I got it wrong as well, Xman? And so did Swans?


!

hmmmmmmmm


lemme guess

did tweedle dumb & tweedle dumber get it wrong


:_<> :_<> :_<>

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So you're saying I got it wrong as well, Xman? And so did Swans?

Seriously??

His response was against the AFL as a fricking whole!!! He never limited it in any way shape or form until after he was called out on it! Like Cracker, I don't fricking believe him! The OP attacked the NRL. Any NRL fan in reply would have to be at least thinking "attack the AFL"! Unless they are suffering from some sort of impairment!

Oh wait, edit. He DOES have an impairment! I've got the proof in my email! I forgot for a minute!

Proof please.
You made a claim .
Show proof.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So you're saying I got it wrong as well, Xman? And so did Swans?

Seriously??

His response was against the AFL as a fricking whole!!! He never limited it in any way shape or form until after he was called out on it! Like Cracker, I don't fricking believe him! The OP attacked the NRL. Any NRL fan in reply would have to be at least thinking "attack the AFL"! Unless they are suffering from some sort of impairment!

Oh wait, edit. He DOES have an impairment! I've got the proof in my email! I forgot for a minute!

Remember 15 pages of you screaming screeching (with help from other fumblers ) about me being RD...

HOw did that GO?

.