Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

been proven a 100 times shit for brains

Try real proof

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

been proven a 100 times shit for brains

Try real proof

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

fumblers & their definition of real

real members .... :_<> :_<>
real participants > ....
real integrity .... ............ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

been proven a 100 times shit for brains

Try real proof

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

fumblers & their definition of real

real members .... :_<> :_<>
real participants > ....
real integrity .... ............ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Ok, try proof with an actual link

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

been proven a 100 times shit for brains

Try real proof

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

fumblers & their definition of real

real members .... :_<> :_<>
real participants > ....
real integrity .... ............ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Ok, try proof with an actual link

have 100 times shit for brains

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

What????
According to the rules here &backed up by you..He doesn't have to prove anything.

Going by the resident FRUITLOOPS posts ,it is up to you to "UNPROVE" it.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

What????
According to the rules here &backed up by you..He doesn't have to prove anything.

Going by the resident FRUITLOOPS posts ,it is up to you to "UNPROVE" it.

No, he claimed something he can prove, a specific percentage of interstate members. That totally different to proving something doesn't exist. If he said "Brisbane have no local members" this would be hard to prove but simple to disprove.

$440 gold memberships sold out

http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/me ... um-gold-11

=D>

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Jez wrote:

Obvious not very good news for the raiders..was surprised I thought they'd have better numbers.

http://m.canberratimes.com.au/rugby-lea ... 31px1.html

I'm surprised they're only a few hundred down on this time last year to be honest
they'll end up around their figure of the last few years ....late 8's to 9,000
& if they start well in 2014 ( horror draw though).....should crack 10,000 for the first time ever

& whats more
almost all their members will come from the area they represent.

unlike the Swines where 33% of their members reside in another state
same for the Kitty Kats
& ...........66%.... for those oxygen thieves in orange

prove it

What????
According to the rules here &backed up by you..He doesn't have to prove anything.

Going by the resident FRUITLOOPS posts ,it is up to you to "UNPROVE" it.

No, he claimed something he can prove, a specific percentage of interstate members. That totally different to proving something doesn't exist. If he said "Brisbane have no local members" this would be hard to prove but simple to disprove.

but but

but but but

Xman wrote:

$440 gold memberships sold out

http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/me ... um-gold-11

=D>

wow

all 20 of them ?? :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

Phelpsy wrote:

Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!

You claime 33% yet is was 20%

Who looked like a fool? >

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!

You claime 33% yet is was 20%

& you claimed I bumped the thread as an excuse for not locking in it ..... & even after lecturing everyone on personal attacks .... posting in it yourself
today ..again showing us all .. you're nothing but a biased fumbling *****

the 21% figure given last year by the Swines..............was in January
by June it was 33% like I said

& that won't change in 2014

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Stewie wrote:
Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya!



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

ah Xman

regarding your lies in the thread you just locked under instruction .... this is the cockhead that bumped that thread
not me .... as you indicated in a pathetic attempt to explain why it wasn't locked earlier

as for this tool & this post
go to the locked thread to see how I made him look like a twat....... again !!

You claime 33% yet is was 20%

& you claimed I bumped the thread as an excuse for not locking in it ..... & even after lecturing everyone on personal attacks .... posting in it yourself
today ..again showing us all .. you're nothing but a biased fumbling *****

the 21% figure given last year by the Swines..............was in January
by June it was 33% like I said

& that won't change in 2014

Hmmmm, so 27600 in January, with 5600 Vic's. The swans finished with 36000, so for 33% they would need 12k Vic members. An extra 6400 Vic members and only 2000 Syndey members ..... :_<>

Another stupid Raiderdave claim busted

He really needs an update on his meds. Hello, Canberra Hospital?

Oh by the way - Raiders struggling to break 10,000 members, eh? If rugby league was the king of Canberra there would be no problem for a city bigger than 300K!