Talking Footy

23k, 5k more than the eels v roosters today.

Isnt Sydney NRL heartland?

Xman wrote:

23k, 5k more than the eels v roosters today.

Isnt Sydney NRL heartland?

Does nRL heartland even exist these days?

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

I said 30k would be good which means 23k is acceptable. Certainly given it was the second highest crowd in Sydney on the weekend and it was a giants home game Id say its acceptable, wouldnt you say?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

Hey KE, how come the Swans are more popular than every NSW nRL team? Why can't the Storm be more popular than just one Victorian AFL team?

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

Hey KE, how come the Swans are more popular than every NSW nRL team?

hmmmmmm

40K watched them on TV in Sydney .............40K , for a derby .... for the battle of the buttplugs or whateva fucking stupid name its got

meanwhile our smallest team in Sydney , penrith ... attracted 250K on Sunday for a woefully unattractive game against the Titans

the swines are LAST
dead last

for support in Sydney you cock molesting minda ..

Yes Dave that is a bit of a worry. After the Swans won the flag last yeah as underdogs in a great game I would have though more people woud be following them this year but obviously not.

I can understand why people of Brisbane are turing off the lions cause they are woefull & the way they played on the weekend was pathetic.

However people of Sydney, the swans are one of the most respectable hard working teams in the AFL, you should stop fearing AFL so much & get behind them.

The Sydney Derby was the most watched AFL game on Fox Footy on Saturday. No doubt it would have had a huge audience in Sydney as that's where the majority of Foxtel subscribers reside.

Stewie wrote:

The Sydney Derby was the most watched AFL game on Fox Footy on Saturday. No doubt it would have had a huge audience in Sydney as that's where the majority of Foxtel subscribers reside.

yes

40K sydneysiders watched on FTA ... a service 100% of them have

but

a much larger number would have been watching on pay tv.. a service that only 33% of them have







13K on pay if they're lucky

what halfwits

13k lol, good one Raiderdave. 30k at least.

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

Hey KE, how come the Swans are more popular than every NSW nRL team?

hmmmmmm

40K watched them on TV in Sydney .............40K , for a derby .... for the battle of the buttplugs or whateva fucking stupid name its got

meanwhile our smallest team in Sydney , penrith ... attracted 250K on Sunday for a woefully unattractive game against the Titans

the swines are LAST
dead last

for support in Sydney you cock molesting minda ..

what dave said stewie you silly clown!

Pete_09 wrote:

Yes Dave that is a bit of a worry. After the Swans won the flag last yeah as underdogs in a great game I would have though more people woud be following them this year but obviously not.

I can understand why people of Brisbane are turing off the lions cause they are woefull & the way they played on the weekend was pathetic.

You're a sensible man pete. Your acknowledgement of the problem was well said. I cant understand why more of your AFL supporting mates dont see the problem. You think they're a bit dumb? I mean its as clear as day, the bulk of swans 'supporters' here in sydney are nothing more than ignorant chardonnay sipping pretentious turds who dont know the rules nor the players and only go to games for some sort of status they believe it gives them when they talk about it in the office of a monday morn. Pathetic, really pathetic.

And of course you've got the bandwagoners who flock to a swans final to also say "i was there" rather than actually view, understand and properly enjoy the game. "Comon ref!" they yell after a perfectly legal shephard

Pete can you have a quiet word with Xman, beaussie and stewie and knock some sense into the dense dribblers?

Thanks mate

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Can any of you short sighted tools tell me why none of you AFL goons were able to say, or even suggest 23k would be a good crowd before the game? Alls of yous said 30k would be good before the match. Then afterwards you've come up with a raft full of reasons why 23k is good.

It's hilarious and pete is the only right man **** you knobs. Well in pete, well in. One day maybe sydney will get behind the code but right now its just not really a big thing here. Its ok, but it's nowhere near RL and some way behind soccer. I'd suggest its probably better than bball though.

Hey KE, how come the Swans are more popular than every NSW nRL team?

hmmmmmm

40K watched them on TV in Sydney .............40K , for a derby .... for the battle of the buttplugs or whateva fucking stupid name its got

meanwhile our smallest team in Sydney , penrith ... attracted 250K on Sunday for a woefully unattractive game against the Titans

the swines are LAST
dead last

for support in Sydney you cock molesting minda ..

"Dead last" but have lead the way for crowd support and memberships for 18 years straight. You sad inbred ****** Dave

The Swans dominating support in Sydney really is a sensitive issue for the nRL bogans.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Hey KE, how come the Swans are more popular than every NSW nRL team?

hmmmmmm

40K watched them on TV in Sydney .............40K , for a derby .... for the battle of the buttplugs or whateva fucking stupid name its got

meanwhile our smallest team in Sydney , penrith ... attracted 250K on Sunday for a woefully unattractive game against the Titans

the swines are LAST
dead last

for support in Sydney you cock molesting minda ..

"Dead last" but have lead the way for crowd support and memberships for 18 years straight. You sad inbred ****** Dave

The Swans dominating support in Sydney really is a sensitive issue for the nRL bogans.

lets add the crowd & TV support together shall we ?

swines
they'd barely beat the wanderers ...........

dead last

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

hmmmmmm

40K watched them on TV in Sydney .............40K , for a derby .... for the battle of the buttplugs or whateva fucking stupid name its got

meanwhile our smallest team in Sydney , penrith ... attracted 250K on Sunday for a woefully unattractive game against the Titans

the swines are LAST
dead last

for support in Sydney you cock molesting minda ..

"Dead last" but have lead the way for crowd support and memberships for 18 years straight. You sad inbred ****** Dave

The Swans dominating support in Sydney really is a sensitive issue for the nRL bogans.

lets add the crowd & TV support together shall we ?

swines
they'd barely beat the wanderers ...........

dead last

Actually they smashed them lol. The Wanderers got 19k to their game, the Giants 23k. The Giants game had about 290k watching on TV while the Wanderers had less than 100k.

Another lie... exposed.