Talking Footy

Stewie wrote:

Xman wrote:

Stewie wrote:

.

Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Xman wrote:

Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

Interesting. Where are your sources?

I wouldn't count Essendon out just yet either. Word from the club is they are extremely confident. Danks law suite suggests they may be right.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

Interesting. Where are your sources?

I wouldn't count Essendon out just yet either. Word from the club is they are extremely confident. Danks law suite suggests they may be right.

Sources? Raiderdave?

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Illegal drugs are covered under WADA.

Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.

So the ACC are targeting prescription drugs, in case they are taken without a script.....

No, they ARE being taken without a script! That's the problem! WADA can't touch that but the ACC CAN!

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.

So the ACC are targeting prescription drugs, in case they are taken without a script.....

No, they ARE being taken without a script! That's the problem! WADA can't touch that but the ACC CAN!

Really?

Here's the report

http://www.crimecommission.gov.au/sites ... eb2013.pdf

Can you find where they say they are targeting prescription medications?

Even if they are the AFL have been cleared

They don't have to.

Striker wrote:

They don't have to.

Thought so

What law says they have to?

Striker wrote:

What law says they have to?

FMD! you insinuated they would examine drugs outside of WADA, specifically prescription drugs. Again, no proof, nothing in their report

Have you read the full report? No you haven't. Yeah neither have I, but the point is that you said that the ACC and WADA cover the exact same area when it comes to drugs - and I told you that WADA do NOT cover prescription drugs issued without a prescription!! Get it?

Striker wrote:

Have you read the full report? No you haven't. Yeah neither have I, but the point is that you said that the ACC and WADA cover the exact same area when it comes to drugs - and I told you that WADA do NOT cover prescription drugs issued without a prescription!! Get it?

The AFL follow WADA. Stop end

The ACC go wider than WADA! Stop. End.

Striker wrote:

The ACC go wider than WADA! Stop. End.

Yet they have never once mentioned prescription drugs

How do you know? Have you read the full report? No, so you don't know!

Striker wrote:

How do you know? Have you read the full report? No, so you don't know!

Breezed through it yep. Never saw anything on prescription drugs, nor has it been even mentioned in the media