Dark days for AFL family

[Raiderdave]

.

Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

[Xman]

Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

Interesting. Where are your sources?

I wouldn't count Essendon out just yet either. Word from the club is they are extremely confident. Danks law suite suggests they may be right.

[Stewie]

we won't lose any clubs you bilthering dick brain
news is filtering in

its no more then a dozen NRL players from about 5 clubs ,all acting as individuals without the knowledge of their clubs

the NRL will have 16 teams starting on March 7th

But I now know why the V FL's Deputy CEO looked a bit green around the gills this afternoon
the VFL will only have 17 clubs able to start their season

Interesting. Where are your sources?

I wouldn't count Essendon out just yet either. Word from the club is they are extremely confident. Danks law suite suggests they may be right.

Sources? Raiderdave?

[Striker]

Illegal drugs are covered under WADA.

Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.

So the ACC are targeting prescription drugs, in case they are taken without a script.....

No, they ARE being taken without a script! That's the problem! WADA can't touch that but the ACC CAN!

[Xman]

Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.

So the ACC are targeting prescription drugs, in case they are taken without a script.....

No, they ARE being taken without a script! That's the problem! WADA can't touch that but the ACC CAN!

Really?

Here's the report

http://www.crimecommission.gov.au/sites ... eb2013.pdf

Can you find where they say they are targeting prescription medications?

Even if they are the AFL have been cleared

[Striker]

They don't have to.

[Xman]

They don't have to.

Thought so

[Striker]

What law says they have to?

[Xman]

What law says they have to?

FMD! you insinuated they would examine drugs outside of WADA, specifically prescription drugs. Again, no proof, nothing in their report

[Striker]

Have you read the full report? No you haven't. Yeah neither have I, but the point is that you said that the ACC and WADA cover the exact same area when it comes to drugs - and I told you that WADA do NOT cover prescription drugs issued without a prescription!! Get it?

[Xman]

Have you read the full report? No you haven't. Yeah neither have I, but the point is that you said that the ACC and WADA cover the exact same area when it comes to drugs - and I told you that WADA do NOT cover prescription drugs issued without a prescription!! Get it?

The AFL follow WADA. Stop end

[Striker]

The ACC go wider than WADA! Stop. End.

[Xman]

The ACC go wider than WADA! Stop. End.

Yet they have never once mentioned prescription drugs

[Striker]

How do you know? Have you read the full report? No, so you don't know!

[Xman]

How do you know? Have you read the full report? No, so you don't know!

Breezed through it yep. Never saw anything on prescription drugs, nor has it been even mentioned in the media