Page 7 of 29
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:15 pm
by Xman
eelofwest wrote:Xman wrote:1 nil,
yay..............
Some comments from the fans...Oh opposing fans giving praise to the wanderers.... =D> =D>
Christo the Daddyo said | November 19th 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Hopefully the Sydney FC defence were watching this game.
“Oh, THAT’S how you’re supposed to defend…”
Reply
Towser said | November 19th 2012 @ 9:18am | Report comment
My thoughts exactly. “Build from the back,build from the back” WSW’s mantra.
SFC’s mantra ” Where’d I put the building blocks Mum”
As an SFC fan it was painful to watch the Wanderers defend so well with 10 men when we look so woeful at the back with 11. We could play with 15 men and still concede 3 goals a game…..
Even though they’re our new rivals it’s hard to be anything other than impressed with the way the Wanderers are going about things. It does show how important a good manager and system are
Reply
Bondy. said | November 19th 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
One could suggest in watching the Glory vs Wanderers that the clubs with less bells and whistles (Non Marquee Types) and with a higher concentration of Australian born players,are the most fluent and effective in the comp, I.E. Central Coast, Newcastle and Western Sydney,although the Wanderers hung on for grim death there yesterday and a dead set sitter by the Glory was missed at the death,they the Wanderers looked as though they’ve been in the comp as a club for five years.
The wanderers parked the bus perfectly yesterday I’m s glory fan but that’s how you defend with 10 men congrats the WSW well done
Reply
Arvind said | November 19th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Wanderers should have finished the match off in the first half but there is no doubts about the character in this team and the support it is generating with the members. Amazing effort. A Happy Wanderer.
Reply
whiskeymac said | November 19th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
WSW very credible – good chance for finals in the first season which would be a great success.
Reply
Nathan of Perth said | November 19th 2012 @ 10:57am | Report comment
Well done to the Wanderers. Very tricky assignment they were handed, but they, and Covic, did brilliantly.
The sting is exacerbated by having also been there for the Wildcats first home game on friday night which went very pear-shaped as well :P
Wanderers ----------------------------------->midgets
So 3 comments and a 1 *cough v 0 *cough score line means the warriors are somehow better than the giants?
But if you want to head down this path how about we compare the Melbourne victory, our second A league team, to the Storm, our only NRL team?
The storm are premiers and have played in 5 of the last 8 GFs
and had an average crowd and membership base of 12k.
The victory have a current membership base of 17k and a 25k crowd average despite only making two of the last 7 GFs. In fact they averaged 19k last year and came 8th
Victory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>storm
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:24 am
by Stewie
Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne and anywhere west of western Shitney.
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:44 am
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne.
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:53 am
by King-Eliagh
Spewie gettin owned by RD. Yet again
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:14 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne.
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
Wow, which game did the Storm get 56K to?
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:43 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne.
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
Wow, which game did the Storm get 56K to?
spewie said CODE c head
last time I looked .... SOO is RL
it would appear RL ... is hardly the least popular code in melb , another clanger by the singletballers
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:34 pm
by King-Eliagh
Clanger! Ouch.
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:52 pm
by eelofwest
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
Wow, which game did the Storm get 56K to?
spewie said CODE c head
last time I looked .... SOO is RL
it would appear RL ... is hardly the least popular code in melb , another clanger by the singletballers
Hence the nik name we gave him Dave.....................Spewie.................all i see is vomit coming from this guy nothing more, he is worse then Xman and that is saying something.....
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:35 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
Wow, which game did the Storm get 56K to?
spewie said CODE c head
last time I looked .... SOO is RL
it would appear RL ... is hardly the least popular code in melb , another clanger by the singletballers
The discussion has been about the storm. Amazing how you all want to avoid them.
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:14 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne.
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
One off games aren't an indication of how popular a sport is dumbarse! Super Rugby has no FTA games, but when 9 has the Wallabies on a 4 hour delay it still outrates what the nRL get into Melbourne live on Gem.
Union > league in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:55 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Even the fucking Melbourne Rebels get bigger crowds than the Storm. The Rebels FFS!
Rl... quite easily the least popular football code in Melbourne.
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
One off games aren't an indication of how popular a sport is dumbarse! Super Rugby has no FTA games, but when 9 has the Wallabies on a 4 hour delay it still outrates what the nRL get into Melbourne live on Gem.
Union > league in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.
but but but .....
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:15 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
One off games aren't an indication of how popular a sport is dumbarse! Super Rugby has no FTA games, but when 9 has the Wallabies on a 4 hour delay it still outrates what the nRL get into Melbourne live on Gem.
Union > league in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.
but but but .....
No buts about it, RU>RL in 4 states of Australia
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:32 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
RL's biggest crowd in Melbourne in 2012.... 56,021
yawnions biggest .... 33,221
our biggest TV audience in Melb in 2012..... 809,000
yawnions .... i dunno ...
.... 100,000 ?
spewie .... not even close to being right ........... again
One off games aren't an indication of how popular a sport is dumbarse! Super Rugby has no FTA games, but when 9 has the Wallabies on a 4 hour delay it still outrates what the nRL get into Melbourne live on Gem.
Union > league in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.
but but but .....
I guess that's what watching nRL does to you.
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:19 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:
One off games aren't an indication of how popular a sport is dumbarse! Super Rugby has no FTA games, but when 9 has the Wallabies on a 4 hour delay it still outrates what the nRL get into Melbourne live on Gem.
Union > league in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.
but but but .....
No buts about it, RU>RL in 4 states of Australia
whaaaaaaa
you can't include origin
whaaaaaaaa
its not fair
Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:23 am
by Raiderdave
