www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Firstly, if I was biased you would have lost today.ParraEelsNRL wrote:nope, that's how it is, I have been right in every BS file so far, the biased mod on the other hand listens to the stupidest little ones and takes advice from them.
LOL.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:I have been right in every BS file so far,
No, you are, Debbie. Stop sooking.ParraEelsNRL wrote:You are that's who.
Interesting to see if News still indulge in their rl pet now they don't have a vested interest.Beaussie wrote:So getting back on topic. Clearly the case has been proven here that the Melbourne Storm are a failed franchise. Not embraced by Victorians, miniscule supporter base which is predominately made up of New Zealanders, totally unsustainable and only kept alive by drip feed from News Ltd/NRL. Haemorraging millions year after year.
NRL Expansion
Adelaide = Failed
Perth = Failed
Melbourne = Failed
Gold Coast = Failed
AFL ExpansionBeaussie wrote:So getting back on topic. Clearly the case has been proven here that the Melbourne Storm are a failed franchise. Not embraced by Victorians, miniscule supporter base which is predominately made up of New Zealanders, totally unsustainable and only kept alive by drip feed from News Ltd/NRL. Haemorraging millions year after year.
NRL Expansion
Adelaide = Failed
Perth = Failed
Melbourne = Failed
Gold Coast = Failed
AFL expansion:Raiderdave wrote:AFL ExpansionBeaussie wrote:So getting back on topic. Clearly the case has been proven here that the Melbourne Storm are a failed franchise. Not embraced by Victorians, miniscule supporter base which is predominately made up of New Zealanders, totally unsustainable and only kept alive by drip feed from News Ltd/NRL. Haemorraging millions year after year.
NRL Expansion
Adelaide = Failed
Perth = Failed
Melbourne = Failed
Gold Coast = Failed
Brisbane failing
Sydney failing
Thuns ...failing
GWS....
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:So getting back on topic. Clearly the case has been proven here that the Melbourne Storm on top of having about $12.50 in the bank
the Lions in 2004 ... had 30K members ... 2011 had 20K members ... 2012 ... will be lucky to have 15K
the Lions in 2004 ... averaged 33K fans a game ... in 2011... 20K ... in 2012 will be lucky to average 15K
the Lions in 2004.... were watched by an average 150K on FTA in Brisbane ... will be lucky if that stays above a 3rd of that in 2012
the Broncos had 4500 members in 2004 .... will have 20,000 in 2012.. most probably 5K more then the Lions
will have 35K average crowds ... & be watched by more then 5 times the numb of people on FTA TV
on top of about $22.60 in the bank
the Swans have experienced plummetting crowds ... ( may get rounded up by 3 NRL sides other then the Broncos in 2012)
memberships ... ( at least 3 NRL sides will put pressure on to overtake them either this year or next )
TV audience ... the Sharks are more popular
are on their way out after one year ..... plummeting memberships ... which will be followed by crowds
the Titans are more then twice as popular on TV then the Lions .. let alone the Thuns
Nice of you to ignore the three teams that are Embarrasing your shambles of a comp!Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote: