Page 7 of 13

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:10 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.
perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon had their nads handed to them by the Brisbane Bombers lawyers



wooohooooo :wink:
Can't wait? Youll have to. For quite a few years yet.
quite a few .... no

3 :wink:

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:13 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon had their nads handed to them by the Brisbane Bombers lawyers



wooohooooo :wink:
Can't wait? Youll have to. For quite a few years yet.
quite a few .... no

3 :wink:
If it happens.

When the NRL get "unders" on another TV deal theyll be back peddling pretty quick

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:28 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Can't wait? Youll have to. For quite a few years yet.
quite a few .... no

3 :wink:
If it happens.

When the NRL get "unders" on another TV deal theyll be back peddling pretty quick

oh I wouldn't claim ova a billion dollars as unders
Expansion is gunna be going on all ova the place .... :wink:

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:20 pm
by NSWAFL
Yeah. All over the place. Like a dog's breakfast! :p

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:53 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Yeah. All over the place. Like a dog's breakfast! :p
no that'd be the AFL's latest attempt

ruined its own comp with it
shameful AFL

shameful [-X [-X [-X [-X

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:59 pm
by cos789
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.
''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd
perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon
I can't wait either, if you think the Storm is a millstone around nrl's neck perth reds will be the entire mill.

It's generally considered that the Bombers are doing very nicely out of the extra publicity.
Should contribute to a bumper crowd for the next Lions home match.

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:14 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.
perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon
I can't wait either, if you think the Storm is a millstone around nrl's neck perth reds will be the entire mill.

It's generally considered that the Bombers are doing very nicely out of the extra publicity.
Should contribute to a bumper crowd for the next Lions home match.
yes... 8-[ ... is there an English translation for this post :-k #-o

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:57 pm
by NSWAFL
Well that proves that you failed comprehension at school, doesn't it?

AFL expansion is on track and targetted. It's the NRL's idea of expansion that's a dog's breakfast.

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:07 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Well that proves that you failed comprehension at school, doesn't it?

AFL expansion is on track and targetted. It's the NRL's idea of expansion that's a dog's breakfast.
at school

well you may have ... but i didn't learn to be fluent in Shit .. at school
:wink:

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:19 pm
by NSWAFL
That's right. You learnt to be fluent in **** because that's all you can understand.

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:55 am
by cos789
Raiderdave wrote:
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon
I can't wait either, if you think the Storm is a millstone around nrl's neck perth reds will be the entire mill.

It's generally considered that the Bombers are doing very nicely out of the extra publicity.
Should contribute to a bumper crowd for the next Lions home match.
yes... 8-[ ... is there an English translation for this post :-k #-o
What part of the post cannot you understand ?

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:09 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
cos789 wrote:
I can't wait either, if you think the Storm is a millstone around nrl's neck perth reds will be the entire mill.

It's generally considered that the Bombers are doing very nicely out of the extra publicity.
Should contribute to a bumper crowd for the next Lions home match.
yes... 8-[ ... is there an English translation for this post :-k #-o
What part of the post cannot you understand ?

all of it :roll:
pure gobbity gook .... but thats not uncommon where you're concerned :wink:

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:19 pm
by cos789
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code.
let's see
What so confusing about this statement ?

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:33 pm
by NSWAFL
He doesn't know what a millstone and a mill is. Surprised?

Re: LOL @ WA Reds Rugby League

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:41 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code.
let's see
What so confusing about this statement ?
hmmm lets see
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd

perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon

I can't wait either, if you think the Storm is a millstone
why would I .. or anyone think this
unlike the dozen or so clubs relying on AFL handouts .. 2 of which are totally reliant .. GWS & the Thuns , the Storm being a millstone around the NRL's neck is a bizzare thing to say ..... the NRL contribute no more .. or less to the Storm then any other club in the comp
not a brass razoo :-k
perth reds will be the entire mill.
they have enough corporate backing already to operate on the far smaller budgets in the NRL ... if the NRL have to give them a bit of assistance
it will be minimal , & a drop in the ocean compared to the bills being presented to the AFL by GWS & the Thuns
It's generally considered that the Bombers are doing very nicely out of the extra publicity.
Which Bombers ? :-k .... Essendon or Brisbane .. & yes .. the new Brisbane franchise are receiving publicity across the country & their profile is through the roof already with their choice of name .... well done to them :wink:
Should contribute to a bumper crowd for the next Lions home match.
ah .... wot 8-[ ... why
& even if you are talking about the flogball mob , why would it contribute one extra fan to a game against the Lions
utter nonsense ... which you are famous for I guess :-k