Fight Club - Football TV Ratings (AFL vs NRL)

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:32 pm

pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
Prove it.

http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/05/nrl ... s-the-afl/

As I pointed out
this isn't a one off either

since about 2003 the NRL's show piece has increased its Metro audience has grown hugely
the average in 1993 was probably 1.7 million .. its now about 2.4 Million
the AFL's has fallen from about 2.7 Million average .. to 2.4

off the back of this
the NRL Grand final has won about 3 of the last 6 GF's total audience
& on one of the years the AFL won the battle of the GF's
SOO took the title as biggest football game of that year .. as it will again in 2011

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:00 pm

As it was pointed out in the comments, WA, SA and Tassie WEREN'T COUNTED in that story!

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:07 pm

TLPG wrote:
As it was pointed out in the comments, WA, SA and Tassie WEREN'T COUNTED in that story!

90 % of WA & SA regionals were ..as they always have been

Tas figures are there
add them on .. be our guest
you still are way ... way behind

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:50 pm

TLPG wrote:
As it was pointed out in the comments, WA, SA and Tassie WEREN'T COUNTED in that story!

I think you will find the only digital stations ABC2 & TDTwernt counted in Tassie figures up until 2009.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:53 pm

pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
As it was pointed out in the comments, WA, SA and Tassie WEREN'T COUNTED in that story!

I think you will find the only digital stations ABC2 & TDTwernt counted in Tassie figures up until 2009.

well take some from the present day ... the highest amount recorded for the two heads from down there
& add em onto to anything you want

it makes . next to no difference

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:12 pm

You're both lying. Show sources to prove that wrong.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:19 pm

TLPG wrote:
You're both lying. Show sources to prove that wrong.

you show sources to prove it right .. thats how its done according to you

or is it the opposite this time to what you said last time , which will be the opposite again when you're asked next time .. mr consistent ?

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:30 pm

TLPG wrote:
You're both lying. Show sources to prove that wrong.

Why is the onus always on us????????

http://www.themercury.com.au/article/20 ... nment.html

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:07 pm

pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
You're both lying. Show sources to prove that wrong.

Why is the onus always on us????????

http://www.themercury.com.au/article/20 ... nment.html

Because you keep making the ridiculous statements. You at least try to back it up, Pussycat - which is more than I can say for Raider!

It's interesting (and Onions saw this but his language and all the follow ups had to go as usual) that this came from 2008, but specifically mentioned digital only. The comment was made about ABC2 (which is not a state transmission) and TDT which is just one network out of the three. Tassie do have three. TDT is affiliated with Ten, which means the AFL figures will be incomplete and there won't be an NRL readings at all.

My comments about inaccuracy remain valid.

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:40 pm

TLPG wrote:
You're both lying. Show sources to prove that wrong.

Why is the onus always on us????????

http://www.themercury.com.au/article/20 ... nment.html[/quote]

Because you keep making the ridiculous statements. You at least try to back it up, Pussycat - which is more than I can say for Raider!

It's interesting (and Onions saw this but his language and all the follow ups had to go as usual) that this came from 2008, but specifically mentioned digital only. The comment was made about ABC2 (which is not a state transmission) and TDT which is just one network out of the three. Tassie do have three. TDT is affiliated with Ten, which means the AFL figures will be incomplete and there won't be an NRL readings at all.

My comments about inaccuracy remain valid.[/quote]

What are the ridiculous statments you are talking about? I've backed up everthing that i have said - unlike you. If you go back through this thread its all there.

Does this help

Television audience measurement company Regional TAM announced yesterday that digital viewership surveys will commence in Tasmania from November 30 [2008].

Currently Tasmanian television ratings are analogue-only, meaning digital-only stations TDT and ABC2 are not being surveyed and households that have digital TV access are not being surveyed at all.

TLPG · Post by **TLPG** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:04 pm

The only statements I've made is to call you out on what I considered to be ridiculous comments - ie assuming that everyone is being counted in the stats you are referring to. I keep proving you wrong with simple reviews of what you link. I don't need proof for that. Nine, Seven and ABC1 are not being counted today, according to your link (and now that I think of it maybe Ten isn't either, as TDT could in fact be the local version of Ten's third channel - to go with the main and OneHD).

Post by **Beaussie** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:38 am

pussycat wrote:
TLPG wrote:
Prove it.

http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/05/nrl ... s-the-afl/

That is 2009 not 2006 which is how this all started when Raider said the 2006 NRL Grand Final easily outrated the 2006 AFL Grand Final.

BTW, nice comment on that site. Even links to this site telling the author to get his facts right in future.

Post by **Beaussie** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:35 am

Oh dear, poor ole NRL absolutely smashed again by the AFL on Sunday.

Where have all the NRL viewers gone?

Sevenâ€™s AFL: Rnd 17: Brisbane Vs Geelong Seven 508,000 5,000 262,000 77,000 96,000 68,000

Sevenâ€™s AFL: Rnd 17: Sydney Vs Fremantle Seven 159,000 51,000 *** *** *** 108,000

Nineâ€™s Sunday Football Nine 492,000 322,000 *** 169,000 *** ***

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-30-4.html

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:15 am

Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, poor ole NRL absolutely smashed again by the AFL on Sunday.

Where have all the NRL viewers gone?

Sevenâ€™s AFL: Rnd 17: Brisbane Vs Geelong Seven 508,000 5,000 262,000 77,000 96,000 68,000

Sevenâ€™s AFL: Rnd 17: Sydney Vs Fremantle Seven 159,000 51,000 *** *** *** 108,000

Nineâ€™s Sunday Football Nine 492,000 322,000 *** 169,000 *** ***

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/07/week-30-4.html

yes ... 16K difference
I noticed that a game between a regional side & a capital city side in the NRL ... rated nearly as a much as an AFL game between 2 capital city sides

& flogged the other ...
I mean what the hell is going on with those ratings for the Swans V Fremantle game

51K for the Swans in Sydney

.... 322K for the NRL game in Sydney
( more then the AFL in Melbourne 262K )

I think you should be asking where are all the AFL fans

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:17 pm

TLPG wrote:
The only statements I've made is to call you out on what I considered to be ridiculous comments - ie assuming that everyone is being counted in the stats you are referring to. I keep proving you wrong with simple reviews of what you link. I don't need proof for that. Nine, Seven and ABC1 are not being counted today, according to your link (and now that I think of it maybe Ten isn't either, as TDT could in fact be the local version of Ten's third channel - to go with the main and OneHD).

The article said digital counting would join the existing annalong counting from the end of 2008. It also mentioned that there was only 2 digital stations in Tasmania, TDT and ABC2

I wouldn't think the AFL GF would be on the abc. And even if you look up TDT on Wikipedia you'll find, I think, they didn't either.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

Fight Club - Football TV Ratings (AFL vs NRL)

Who is online