NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Well xman, well disagree then.
Still, what are you going to say when the rest of the NRL deal is finished, will you but but but as usual, or gloat gloat gloat?
That's the more important question.
Still, what are you going to say when the rest of the NRL deal is finished, will you but but but as usual, or gloat gloat gloat?
That's the more important question.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Raiderdave wrote:so all we need is 93m from the kiwis ... & its all ova folksXman wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Nope.
All included.it says CASHThe cash component is $1.118 billion, with $135 million extra in contra arrangements. The cash contribution is $369 million more than in the previous broadcast deal.
:<>
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
ah no. Parra is claiming the Australian coverage is more money for less games. Last I checked NZ isnt part of Australia....Raiderdave wrote:so all we need is 93m from the kiwis ... & its all ova folksXman wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:Nope.
All included.it says CASHThe cash component is $1.118 billion, with $135 million extra in contra arrangements. The cash contribution is $369 million more than in the previous broadcast deal.

Plus, the NRLs cash component is nearly 200M behind the AFL

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 6620
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 pm
- Team: The Shanghai Sharks
- Location: far away
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Xman wrote:Yes, i read your posts. Not sure why though.pussycat wrote:Xman wrote:the reasons FTA coverage is preferred is twofold:
1. more exposure because more people have access to FA, even 2nd digital channels.
2. free viewership for fans and potential fans
As for the AFL rolling over, what are you on? Every team in WA, SA, NSW and QLD is on FA every week. Last year the AFL was only on TV in NSW and QLD maybe twice a weekend. Now their are 4 live games, BETTER than the NRL in their own homeland!![]()
![]()
The Storm are on gem in Victoria, not CH9They got, what less than 8 FTA games in to Melbourne last year? Yeah, theyre doing well!
I just addressed that point! do you bother to read posts other than your own?
# secondary channels GWS/Suns match would get a lot less exposure then say Canberra on PTV. Its Exposure clubs want - exposure to the largest possible audience. and the two new kids on the block have really missed out big time there. There is know one to blame but D. Hes the one that rolled over for the cash. I guess he needs it to cover some of there losses(or should I say half the teams loses)![]()
digital FTA take up would be FAR higher than PayTV.
As for AD caving in, How is 4 live games to ever state, plus home teams on every week, caving in?![]()
![]()
GWS ratings
R1.
Mate 115K
PTV 251k
R2.
Mate26K
PTV 174k
R3.
Mate + WA 120K
PTV 157K
R4.
Mate + SA 166k
PTV 194k
R5.
Mate To low to rate
PTV 135K
I only done 5 rounds
Rugby League, the dominant force in Australian sport!
"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys

"I do like annoying the Victorians; they are so easy to get, At times I've looked at them and had a giggle." Peter V'Landys
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
where ?... he just said NRL V VFLah no. Parra is claiming the Australian coverage is more money for less games.
we win .. even with less games .... & infinetly less broadcast hours

again .. your deals done .. ours isn't d headPlus, the NRLs cash component is nearly 200M behind the AFL


our present cash component is 925 Million ... I expect it to be 1.150 to 1.175 Billion when our deal is done
meaning we will have 30 to 60 million more in actual cash.
its time that you accept that the days of claiming a bigger TV deal as some indication of the value of your sport to this nation
are over , as yr about to be ................. No 2

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
All of those ratings are lower than the Warrior who are shown on Pay TV only 

signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
but but butRaiderdave wrote:ah no c head .... they had a good finishStewie wrote:They had a good season this year, did they not? What makes you think anything will change come the last 6 games with the nRL scheduling? AFL fans would be up in arms if Collingwood got 17 Friday night games and a team that finished above them on the ladder only had 1 game on FTA. We don't accept that shit though like nRL fans do.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Don't be so quick to jump guys, if the Raiders are having a good season, ch 9 still has the last 6 rounds leading into the finals, open.
but they were still equal 2nd last ... at round 18
VFL fans don't know how to get .. up in arms about anything
if they did , they'd do something about how their comp is geared toward the sides in the non traditional states
it is obscene that a side like the swines are given an extra million to use in the salary cap .. still .. after 30 years
& seriously
why don't the VFL force teams that play the midgets & thuns .. to play with one arm tied behind their backs , as that'd be fairer then the help these 2 are getting to " compete" in the VFL.
VFL... a joke![]()
![]()
![]()

Your shit club is getting screwed by the nRL. End of

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
NRL's $Billion deal shattered was the headline wasn't it stewie?
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
That would mean something... if 7 had all their games exclusively!Raiderdave wrote:Ch 7.. 400 Million for 4 games a weekXman wrote:so ch9 paiiid more than ch7 did they?ParraEelsNRL wrote:Less TV, less games yet more money, how sad.
the only reason the nrl got close is because they sold control, hence this discussion
Ch 9..... 450 Million for 3
can I help you with anything else
More Raiderdave fail.

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
ParraEelsNRL wrote:NRL's $Billion deal shattered was the headline wasn't it stewie?



yeah ... how'd that one fly for ya spewie ?



RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Gotta love NSW journalismParraEelsNRL wrote:NRL's $Billion deal shattered was the headline wasn't it stewie?

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
ch 7 gets 4 games a week ... X 3 hrs of advertising per gameStewie wrote:That would mean something... if 7 had all their games exclusively!Raiderdave wrote:Ch 7.. 400 Million for 4 games a weekXman wrote:so ch9 paiiid more than ch7 did they?
the only reason the nrl got close is because they sold control, hence this discussion
Ch 9..... 450 Million for 3
can I help you with anything else
More Raiderdave fail.
so 12 hrs ... X 23 weeks
so.. 276 hrs a year for 80 Million dollars
ch 9 gets .. 3 games a week ... X 2 hrs worth of advertising per game
so ... 6 hrs a week ... X 26 weeks
156 hrs .. for 90 million
almost half the hours broadcast
for more money
NRL.... most valuable sporting commodity on Aust TV

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
Except you dumb fuck it is being simulcast by a rival network who is also paying for the game.The fact is your deal is more than 200 million fact. The AFL achieved this while demanding coverage for all teams,demanding simulcast and keeping the right to control their game. You bent over and copped the golden rod just to get close.Ask the raiders. You can't sell the digital rights because fox already bought most of them and sky are offering less than the 60 mill they paid last time. The kiwis now have a midnight grand final.lol Read the repucom report from last year you poor Mullet wearing unwashed. AFL first daylight second.Raiderdave wrote:ch 7 gets 4 games a week ... X 3 hrs of advertising per gameStewie wrote:That would mean something... if 7 had all their games exclusively!Raiderdave wrote:Ch 7.. 400 Million for 4 games a week
Ch 9..... 450 Million for 3
can I help you with anything else
More Raiderdave fail.
so 12 hrs ... X 23 weeks
so.. 276 hrs a year for 80 Million dollars
ch 9 gets .. 3 games a week ... X 2 hrs worth of advertising per game
so ... 6 hrs a week ... X 26 weeks
156 hrs .. for 90 million
almost half the hours broadcast
for more money
NRL.... most valuable sporting commodity on Aust TV
-
- Coach
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
- Location:
Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
So no mention of Fox Footy anywhere? You sad, deluded soulRaiderdave wrote:ch 7 gets 4 games a week ... X 3 hrs of advertising per gameStewie wrote:That would mean something... if 7 had all their games exclusively!Raiderdave wrote:Ch 7.. 400 Million for 4 games a week
Ch 9..... 450 Million for 3
can I help you with anything else
More Raiderdave fail.
so 12 hrs ... X 23 weeks
so.. 276 hrs a year for 80 Million dollars
ch 9 gets .. 3 games a week ... X 2 hrs worth of advertising per game
so ... 6 hrs a week ... X 26 weeks
156 hrs .. for 90 million
almost half the hours broadcast
for more money
NRL.... most valuable sporting commodity on Aust TV

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights
You're comparing national figures to single states dumbass!pussycat wrote:Xman wrote:Yes, i read your posts. Not sure why though.pussycat wrote:
I just addressed that point! do you bother to read posts other than your own?
# secondary channels GWS/Suns match would get a lot less exposure then say Canberra on PTV. Its Exposure clubs want - exposure to the largest possible audience. and the two new kids on the block have really missed out big time there. There is know one to blame but D. Hes the one that rolled over for the cash. I guess he needs it to cover some of there losses(or should I say half the teams loses)![]()
digital FTA take up would be FAR higher than PayTV.
As for AD caving in, How is 4 live games to ever state, plus home teams on every week, caving in?![]()
![]()
GWS ratings
R1.
Mate 115K
PTV 251k
R2.
Mate26K
PTV 174k
R3.
Mate + WA 120K
PTV 157K
R4.
Mate + SA 166k
PTV 194k
R5.
Mate To low to rate
PTV 135K
I only done 5 rounds

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.