Page 60 of 852

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:10 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.

Is targeted only in RL?

What I mean is, I see the ratings for vfl and they have home games in home states to boost ratings every week, do you hear RL fans using this and making but but buts?

Nope, we get on with kicking your arse regardless ;)

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:21 pm
by Raiderdave
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.

Is targeted only in RL?

What I mean is, I see the ratings for vfl and they have home games in home states to boost ratings every week, do you hear RL fans using this and making but but buts?

Nope, we get on with kicking your arse regardless ;)

exactly

how do these merkins explain rnd 25 last year

NSW & QLD both got the game out of Melbourne
Dragons & Storm

839K Metro
571K regional

exactly who were we targeting then ? :?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:01 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Ummmm, qld? maybe Vic***ia? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:02 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
1,4 million for that game dave, imagine if it was shown nation wide.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:11 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.
I don't think it's been done at all. Show us evidence.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:15 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.
I don't think it's been done at all. Show us evidence.


Raiderdave wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.

Is targeted only in RL?

What I mean is, I see the ratings for vfl and they have home games in home states to boost ratings every week, do you hear RL fans using this and making but but buts?

Nope, we get on with kicking your arse regardless ;)

exactly

how do these merkins explain rnd 25 last year

NSW & QLD both got the game out of Melbourne
Dragons & Storm

839K Metro
571K regional

exactly who were we targeting then ? :?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:39 pm
by NSWAFL
That regional number is wrong.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:29 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
That regional number is wrong.

I'm about to call bs on you again dumbarse.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:56 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.

Is targeted only in RL?

What I mean is, I see the ratings for vfl and they have home games in home states to boost ratings every week, do you hear RL fans using this and making but but buts?

Nope, we get on with kicking your arse regardless ;)

exactly

how do these merkins explain rnd 25 last year

NSW & QLD both got the game out of Melbourne
Dragons & Storm

839K Metro
571K regional

exactly who were we targeting then ? :?
Ive already explained this multiple times. The entire NRl heartland is in two states. All they need is 1 live game with a popular team from each of those two states, combined with live and in prime time, and the ratings will come. This is the strength of the current setup of the NRL. the AFL cannot do this because it is too spread out. They can never get a game that involves each of their heartland states at the same time. They can never get a game that is shown in prime time and live in each of these states because they are separated by 2 hours and the game goes for 3.

The strength of the AFL is it is national and appeals to each market to varying degrees.

This is why the AFL get such good ratings, and usually win the GF battle. For once the game is live in to each state for both the NrL and AFL games, and generally speaking, appeals to the entire nation equally. This is a more comparable measure of the level of support nationally.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:00 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
That regional number is wrong.

I'm about to call bs on you again dumbarse.
Go ahead. There are NO accurate regional figures. Fact.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:05 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
That regional number is wrong.

I'm about to call bs on you again dumbarse.
Go ahead. There are NO accurate regional figures. Fact.

say that again you **** flip

& I'll ask bearsy for your contact details
so proceedings can be started against you ... by solicitors from oztam.. thinktv .. & neilson .. for libel & slander

how dare you sully their good name in public like that [-X [-X [-X [-( [-( [-(

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:06 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not all the time as has been proven many times now.

Is targeted only in RL?

What I mean is, I see the ratings for vfl and they have home games in home states to boost ratings every week, do you hear RL fans using this and making but but buts?

Nope, we get on with kicking your arse regardless ;)

exactly

how do these merkins explain rnd 25 last year

NSW & QLD both got the game out of Melbourne
Dragons & Storm

839K Metro
571K regional

exactly who were we targeting then ? :?
Ive already explained this multiple times. The entire NRl heartland is in two states. All they need is 1 live game with a popular team from each of those two states, combined with live and in prime time, and the ratings will come. This is the strength of the current setup of the NRL. the AFL cannot do this because it is too spread out. They can never get a game that involves each of their heartland states at the same time. They can never get a game that is shown in prime time and live in each of these states because they are separated by 2 hours and the game goes for 3.

The strength of the AFL is it is national and appeals to each market to varying degrees.

This is why the AFL get such good ratings, and usually win the GF battle. For once the game is live in to each state for both the NrL and AFL games, and generally speaking, appeals to the entire nation equally. This is a more comparable measure of the level of support nationally.

exactly which of these states do the Storm come from ? :-k

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:43 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

exactly

how do these merkins explain rnd 25 last year

NSW & QLD both got the game out of Melbourne
Dragons & Storm

839K Metro
571K regional

exactly who were we targeting then ? :?
Ive already explained this multiple times. The entire NRl heartland is in two states. All they need is 1 live game with a popular team from each of those two states, combined with live and in prime time, and the ratings will come. This is the strength of the current setup of the NRL. the AFL cannot do this because it is too spread out. They can never get a game that involves each of their heartland states at the same time. They can never get a game that is shown in prime time and live in each of these states because they are separated by 2 hours and the game goes for 3.

The strength of the AFL is it is national and appeals to each market to varying degrees.

This is why the AFL get such good ratings, and usually win the GF battle. For once the game is live in to each state for both the NrL and AFL games, and generally speaking, appeals to the entire nation equally. This is a more comparable measure of the level of support nationally.

exactly which of these states do the Storm come from ? :-k
Are you saying that Melbourne is RL heartland? :?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:50 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Ive already explained this multiple times. The entire NRl heartland is in two states. All they need is 1 live game with a popular team from each of those two states, combined with live and in prime time, and the ratings will come. This is the strength of the current setup of the NRL. the AFL cannot do this because it is too spread out. They can never get a game that involves each of their heartland states at the same time. They can never get a game that is shown in prime time and live in each of these states because they are separated by 2 hours and the game goes for 3.

The strength of the AFL is it is national and appeals to each market to varying degrees.

This is why the AFL get such good ratings, and usually win the GF battle. For once the game is live in to each state for both the NrL and AFL games, and generally speaking, appeals to the entire nation equally. This is a more comparable measure of the level of support nationally.

exactly which of these states do the Storm come from ? :-k
Are you saying that Melbourne is RL heartland? :?

you said if get a side from NSW or QLD in a big game ... the ratings will come

I asked which of those states are the Storm from

answer neither

so how bout them amazing ratings for a club game ? :wink:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:32 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I'm about to call bs on you again dumbarse.
Go ahead. There are NO accurate regional figures. Fact.

say that again you **** flip

& I'll ask bearsy for your contact details
so proceedings can be started against you ... by solicitors from oztam.. thinktv .. & neilson .. for libel & slander

how dare you sully their good name in public like that [-X [-X [-X [-( [-( [-(
There are NO accurate regional figures. Fact.

Go on then. Try and ask for my contact details. See how far you get. The only way anyone could get my contact details is if they start a legal action and supoena Beaussie for them. OzTam is metro. Think TV is garbage. Neilson don't even enter into the equation. RegionalTam has more holes than swiss cheese.